Wong,
         Every betselection(specially those covering 18 or more numbers) are very stable in long run but there will be harsh times in those too like 25/100 and you can not pre-guess that ever. Think of a strategy that can go across such cases without huge losses and you have a grail of your own.

Any further updates from any student of the "SCHOOL"?

When we play an RNG game, specially I talk about roulette, we are most bothered about whether we are going to get a truly unbiased results or the results could be a manipulated/tilted one in the favor of casino and against player. Many players even believe that an RNG roulette is not a true roulette and chance of manipulations are very high. Since most of the players end with losses, perceptions sound like reality and presumptions of unfairness seem to hold waters.
                  A few casinos, specially betvoyager casino claims to have two features that ensures total verifiable true randomness, namely:
Randomness control and Fairness Control. Let us analyse both parts to see how far their claims are correct and can we rely upon those claims.

Randomness Control:
                                  IT uses SHA-256 mechanism.

What is SHA-256?
The SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm) is one of a number of cryptographic hash functions. A cryptographic hash is like a signature for a text or a data file. SHA-256 algorithm generates an almost-unique, fixed size 256-bit (32-byte) hash. Hash is a one way function – it cannot be decrypted back. This makes it suitable for password validation, challenge hash authentication, anti-tamper, digital signatures.

SHA-256 is one of the successor hash functions to SHA-1, and is one of the strongest hash functions available.

A game with randomness control is conducted during a series of successive spins, and the length of a series can be determined by the player himself. The random sequence of numbers is formed before the beginning of a series. These numbers range from 0 to 36 and correspond to those numbers, on which the ball is supposed to land. The player can change the 'planned' number before each regular spin by defining so-called corrective shift.

When the game session starts, the first random sequence of numbers is created automatically. By default, this sequence consists of 10 numbers, so the length of the appropriate series of spins is equal to 10. A game with randomness control is conducted with the help of the panel that is located in the bottom part of the game window. A player can see the checksum of sequence, computed according to the SHA-256 algorithm, copy that and later check the same with many independent sites.

Is it a conclusive way to determine that the order of numbers are pre-determined one and irrespective of what we bet upon, it will come in the pre-determined way that we can opt to change as and when we wish? Does it ensure that casino has no say in what kind of favorable or unfavorable outcomes we are going to get? Is it a guarantee of fairness? Shouldn't every casino adhere to same standards?

Please comment....

Your method claimed to win flat that ran through a bot. No methodology can prove that theoretically or by any simulation. You further claimed that it can earn 3k from 500 easily a month. You never dared to show any simulation graph and asking for a rental of $500 a month. Hence, a trial could be anybody's ask in such case.
               I do not have exorbitant and fraudulent claim like this fraud Azim, who also claims his religion allows to pimp bots and tools of gambling and earn livelihood from there but do not put his own money to earn.
                 MY Positive Gaming Module is an MM approach theoretically explainable. Once you know that, you own that. That is why suckers like you who are talking too smarta## can not get to see or try that before paying for that. And before asking all these, read my sales page once more and ask things not already told there.

@Captain,
       Azim is doing namecallings and mudslinging in open threads calling my answer here. He is a person who takes defence of his religion to take excuse of his not gambling and winning himself. He lacks even elementary knowledge of gaming and in the name of offering to code for others, steal ideas and try to earn off that. I have seen many of such people over internet forums. Thanksfully there are Victor, Stef, Nick and Ophis type of programmers too that understand the sanctity of any original idea.
       This troll has been removed recently from other forums for the same. Ask Ken.

Where is your bot that beats 700 million spins? You kept that in the cave too? GUT is a foolish fanciful way to play having no substance and anyone using that as source of inspiration is most ignorant player ever. You are a troll and your videos with fun money prove nothing. Try to play with real money with your bot, you will go bankrupt soon. Go buy some basic books on mathematics, probability and statistics before entering to any debate with me.
     

Harsh Session #20:
                              117 Losses vs 95 wins


L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W

And you better keep your revelations in the cave where you found that. Don't teach father to f***.

Extreme variance, to me is at least 5 SD below the mean. To wait for that to pass is like waiting for 30 reds or blacks in a row to "pass" virtually before betting. It could take your life before you get such variance. Come out of these fallacies spread by ignorant forum kids and silly system writers. Waiting for anything may not still get you beatable span.

And your unique method beat them flat? Where is that bot that can turn casinos upside down where player keeps winning flat only?

Do not act smart. You are selling gambling bots on false pretext of them winning flat and that too of testing 700 millions spins. Where did you get those spins from? A cave?
                If you have such a bot, you do not need even second person. Just one account should be enough.

You r trying to fool yourself, your religion or rest of us?
https://www.islamweb.net/en/article/176683/islam-on-gambling

and what about your son going to gamble? He has a different faith?

This guy has outrageous claims that none can believe. He says that he has tested a method for 700 million spins and that is winning flat. He was earlier awestruck with GUT that is a proven failure method by itself. He shown me some videos of fun money plays. I told him that proves nothing. Being a programmer, code whatever u want to test and show me a graph of the simulation of data provided by me. He never did that.

  i never said that my method can not lose. I just made my MM better than ever that can sustain and pass through very harsh times as I shown through my sessions as LW. Any normal methodology can not bear such variance and the variety they have can not be possible be beaten by any other approach. At least I do not know anything else doing the same.
           Winning a game of house edge flat is impossible.

He doesn't gamble due to religious problems but can code for gamblers. That is like saying that I can kill an animal and sell the meat while being a vegetarian myself. Shameless and ruthless fellow.

There are at least 8 of them who act too smart while having nothing with them.

Newest in the league is: Azim.

He is being oversmart here talking of me while I tried to still behave well.
He claim to have a bot that has been tested upon 700 millions spins. Yes you heard it right.
Then why don't he win big money himself while trying to rent a bot.
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]

Now anybody please ask him where is the bot that beats 700 millions spins flat. He is a fraud. He has claims that are out of this world while he lacks even elementary knowledge of randomness or gambling. At one time he says he can not gamble as not allowed by his religion. Next he says he will inherit this only to his son. What a nice person.

 The forum is full of trolls and frustrated souls who have nothing to talk of but crying around.

           Gizmotron has been a nice contributor, undoubtedly. He belongs to the genre of Bayes, another very valuable member here. I do not understand why everyone is attacking him without trying to understand what he is offering. Now, he has some takers of his methodology. They can vouch for him or against him, clarifying whether his claims are valid or not. Before the flying machine was invented, everybody was suspicious of that ever working in real. Physics existed before that too but none could prove that an aeroplane kind of thing will ever exist that can carry hundreds of people together thousands of miles in a few hours.
                              Those who are very sure that nothing can win in gambling should not be on gambling forums and try something else somewhere else. Maybe some day I and Gizmo work together bettering each other.