Playing a single number could be practically the worst choice and a perfect no, in real casino environment. Unless one has patience to keep playing thousands of spins to conclude a game, it is not recommended.
           For better understanding what can we get to see playing a single number by any parameters one can see the fate of #3 of zumma in http://betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/albalaha's-open-challenge-can-anyone-beat-the-worst/

You can chose to waste many hundred hours on searching for anything that is called stable always but there is none which is stable all the times. Wrong expectations will only worsen your way to play and research. Talk of a wise strategy to face the worst than trying to magically find a bet that doesn't harass ever.

Quote from: zuffle on June 20, 2016, 03:00:24 AM
The problem with saying systems will fail in the long run is defining the long run.  If my system works for me for 50 years and I die, was it successful in the long run?  It was for me, my run is over.

Check the link in my last post. I have already defined the long run.

Wong,
Your or my strategy doesn't affect randomness and thereby no way to bet is better than others. Bets with larger coverage gets stable sooner but a dozen not hitting 30 spins is not better than a single number not hitting for 300 spins.

Wong,
         Every betselection(specially those covering 18 or more numbers) are very stable in long run but there will be harsh times in those too like 25/100 and you can not pre-guess that ever. Think of a strategy that can go across such cases without huge losses and you have a grail of your own.

Any further updates from any student of the "SCHOOL"?

When we play an RNG game, specially I talk about roulette, we are most bothered about whether we are going to get a truly unbiased results or the results could be a manipulated/tilted one in the favor of casino and against player. Many players even believe that an RNG roulette is not a true roulette and chance of manipulations are very high. Since most of the players end with losses, perceptions sound like reality and presumptions of unfairness seem to hold waters.
                  A few casinos, specially betvoyager casino claims to have two features that ensures total verifiable true randomness, namely:
Randomness control and Fairness Control. Let us analyse both parts to see how far their claims are correct and can we rely upon those claims.

Randomness Control:
                                  IT uses SHA-256 mechanism.

What is SHA-256?
The SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm) is one of a number of cryptographic hash functions. A cryptographic hash is like a signature for a text or a data file. SHA-256 algorithm generates an almost-unique, fixed size 256-bit (32-byte) hash. Hash is a one way function – it cannot be decrypted back. This makes it suitable for password validation, challenge hash authentication, anti-tamper, digital signatures.

SHA-256 is one of the successor hash functions to SHA-1, and is one of the strongest hash functions available.

A game with randomness control is conducted during a series of successive spins, and the length of a series can be determined by the player himself. The random sequence of numbers is formed before the beginning of a series. These numbers range from 0 to 36 and correspond to those numbers, on which the ball is supposed to land. The player can change the 'planned' number before each regular spin by defining so-called corrective shift.

When the game session starts, the first random sequence of numbers is created automatically. By default, this sequence consists of 10 numbers, so the length of the appropriate series of spins is equal to 10. A game with randomness control is conducted with the help of the panel that is located in the bottom part of the game window. A player can see the checksum of sequence, computed according to the SHA-256 algorithm, copy that and later check the same with many independent sites.

Is it a conclusive way to determine that the order of numbers are pre-determined one and irrespective of what we bet upon, it will come in the pre-determined way that we can opt to change as and when we wish? Does it ensure that casino has no say in what kind of favorable or unfavorable outcomes we are going to get? Is it a guarantee of fairness? Shouldn't every casino adhere to same standards?

Please comment....

Your method claimed to win flat that ran through a bot. No methodology can prove that theoretically or by any simulation. You further claimed that it can earn 3k from 500 easily a month. You never dared to show any simulation graph and asking for a rental of $500 a month. Hence, a trial could be anybody's ask in such case.
               I do not have exorbitant and fraudulent claim like this fraud Azim, who also claims his religion allows to pimp bots and tools of gambling and earn livelihood from there but do not put his own money to earn.
                 MY Positive Gaming Module is an MM approach theoretically explainable. Once you know that, you own that. That is why suckers like you who are talking too smarta## can not get to see or try that before paying for that. And before asking all these, read my sales page once more and ask things not already told there.

@Captain,
       Azim is doing namecallings and mudslinging in open threads calling my answer here. He is a person who takes defence of his religion to take excuse of his not gambling and winning himself. He lacks even elementary knowledge of gaming and in the name of offering to code for others, steal ideas and try to earn off that. I have seen many of such people over internet forums. Thanksfully there are Victor, Stef, Nick and Ophis type of programmers too that understand the sanctity of any original idea.
       This troll has been removed recently from other forums for the same. Ask Ken.

Where is your bot that beats 700 million spins? You kept that in the cave too? GUT is a foolish fanciful way to play having no substance and anyone using that as source of inspiration is most ignorant player ever. You are a troll and your videos with fun money prove nothing. Try to play with real money with your bot, you will go bankrupt soon. Go buy some basic books on mathematics, probability and statistics before entering to any debate with me.
     

Harsh Session #20:
                              117 Losses vs 95 wins


L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W

And you better keep your revelations in the cave where you found that. Don't teach father to f***.

Extreme variance, to me is at least 5 SD below the mean. To wait for that to pass is like waiting for 30 reds or blacks in a row to "pass" virtually before betting. It could take your life before you get such variance. Come out of these fallacies spread by ignorant forum kids and silly system writers. Waiting for anything may not still get you beatable span.

And your unique method beat them flat? Where is that bot that can turn casinos upside down where player keeps winning flat only?

Do not act smart. You are selling gambling bots on false pretext of them winning flat and that too of testing 700 millions spins. Where did you get those spins from? A cave?
                If you have such a bot, you do not need even second person. Just one account should be enough.

You r trying to fool yourself, your religion or rest of us?
https://www.islamweb.net/en/article/176683/islam-on-gambling

and what about your son going to gamble? He has a different faith?