3rd Session:
   Maxbet   25   Finish   9   
                              Count L   64      
Worst   -105                 COUNT W   52      





L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W

So far, whatever progressions I have read or heard of is meant for short runs ignoring harsh possibilities and house edge disadvantage. None tried to make a feasible one for long run where things are far more balanced and closed to average expectancy.

Session:2

   Maxbet   23   Finish   11
                   Count L   60   
Worst   -85      COUNT W   45   





L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W

Although, Positive gambling module takes care of 90% of the harshest sessions possible to take them out of placed bets but even after all the safeguards, one can still witness tough and bad stretches in EC betting. Let us see how the different harsh sessions were dealt by Positive Gambling Module, I call it PGM.
Note: All Ls and Ws were played ones.

Session 1:

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W

            It was one of the worst sessions possible. 151 Losses and 89 Wins only. No streak to help much.
Max bet=43 units.
Max DD= -203
End=+25

I will try, honestly to point out where u r going wrong and what can be improved. Audiokinesis turned out to be my old friend from Hungary.

Unless we do acid test of a system, we can always have an illusion of a system being great as in short sessions it may get to see losses after so many successful sessions. Variance or say luck may be at your side. Even a ten step martingale players get to win for months and even years if they play once/twice a week.
                              Only way to ensure the real fate of a system is the long run test on complete random and unknown data. http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400636/Long-run-in-gambling#.V2YTUvl97IU

Quote from: BetJack on June 14, 2016, 04:48:53 PM
Hello
Today is to say at least is а happy day 
Play all the 7 horror sessions in one defined way
and
won most of them
results
sessions 1/end +35  /max bet 80  /drop down -398
sessions 2/end +13  /max bet 94  /drop down -263
sessions 3/end +19  /max bet 80  /drop down -131
sessions 4/end -195 /max bet 94  /drop down -519
sessions 5/end -66  /max bet 60  /drop down -174
sessions 6/end +65 /max bet 101/drop down -384
sessions 7/end +21 /max bet 60  /drop down -240
in
generally have to make some changes to make it better ....
but it's a start
this is the way ...

@Betjack,
You are betting too big and losing still in two sessions and overall. Need to sharpen your way yet. If you demonstrate what you did exactly, I would point out mistakes.

This topic has been moved to Albalaha's Exclusive.

http://betselection.cc/index.php?topic=1410.0

Quote from: greenguy on June 03, 2016, 07:53:24 AM
Going by your maths, if a -300 unit DD happens, that puts buyers in a 10,000 spin recovery period... a 10,000 SPIN RECOVERY PERIOD!

God help them if they get a second -300 unit drawdown while they're at it.

Oh really!!!!
             From where you got this revelation green sucker? This trolling buffoon along with its baldy friend who licked my feet for two years are acting oversmart here.

            With this methodology stop losses are very rare and recoveries are very easy. That is what makes it positive gambling.
Positive Gambling= A positive approach of playing that gives a positive chance to be ahead in long run unlike any other system ever created.

Play all the 7 horror sessions in one defined way, all over and test how good your method is in bad to worse cases.

Horror Session: 7th..   W=45, L=60


L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W

Ironically, people are still into a delusion that there will be a magical way of picking bets that will give any kind of advantage by itself. Never going to happen. Wake up guys.

Quote from: Tomla on June 02, 2016, 03:36:49 PM
aren't you selling a progression?

         Increasing or decreasing bets alone, be it mild or harsh doesn't help winning an uncertain series of events. Money management could mean a lot than just increasing and decreasing bets and it should be able to explain reasons for whatever change and volume it suggests.

    You have a lot to learn still, baldy.

Quote from: Tomla on June 02, 2016, 03:36:49 PM
aren't you selling a progression?

I sold you some knowledge too that you kept paying for two years till you got my best, paid for that for a while and later you became smarta**.
  Gladly, I am not giving anybody any chance to ditch me anymore swearing upon his kids. I believe you might not have forgotten me and my lessons, if you have even a bit of humanity still inside you.

Because they were created on false premises and assumptions than realities of the game like virtual limit of variance, table limits that a casino will offer realistically and a realistic bankroll. Martingale, Fibonacci, Labouchere and all their cousines were created ignoring all. Needless to say, they are bound to do irreparable damage in just one failure and even two- three successive failures could be seen too.
These progressions can beat any probability that could come in the game provided we have trillions of chips to risk for winning 1 and no table limits too. Nice fantasy!!!!!

D'alembert: This classical comedy of +1/-1 were done assuming law of averages to be true and getting compensatory wins later. Further, it believes in equilibrium while in reality house edge makes it impossible to have equilibrium for any EC in the long run. Even without a house edge there may not be an equilibrium so long one can play.

Oscar's Grind: This assumes there will be cluster of wins after cluster of losses and hence increasing only in wins and same as last after losses considered safe while in reality, it doesn't hold. There may be a good cluster, there may be none.

HP Johnson: This absolute hilarious illusion made many buffoons jump with Eureka while it is merely Flat bet to begin, Labouchere when string gets shorter and an ugly martingale at last. If you are not lucky enough to get all the wins at last very organized way, it finishes too bad.

More later.........