Many members here claim that they are so clever that they will never encounter bad moments and run away before a run from hell kills them  but they are only ignorant or myopic. One can get 25 wins in 100 for example if he keeps running in 2 wins in 10 spins, 4 in next 15 spins, 6 in next 25 spins, 10 in next 30 spins and 3 in next 20 spins. Every method is meant for near perfect cases forgetting these situations. In that case, winning is only possible if we somehow keep getting "near standard" results.
                Funny thing is, their play loses all they gain in near standard cases in one horrible run and that is why they can not think of winning in long run.
       Many claim to beat the game seeing "trends" and  "patterns" while they are only illusory and can not give any edge. Any long run simulation can prove that.

Are you tired of losing in casinos? Want to know why are you destined to lose only? Is there any way you can

improve your chances to win while enjoying gambling and not get fainted at seeing

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWLLLLLWLLLLLLLLLLWLWLLLLLLLLLLLW  type cases that are called "run from the hell" ? Everyone can tell you a method to be played in average times while on getting harsh times you will lose what you can never earn back. My positive gambling module is trying to make a difference right there.

People look for winning systems and methods while it is a full module of how exactly one should play having positive expectations of win, in the long run. It includes clear safeguards regarding how to avoid LOSING BIG in the worst streaks that can plunder whatever you can bet and how to sustain the worst even if it creeps in our session despite all the safeguards without losing a fortune. I do have an MM which is never heard before that behaves as per the session is going and kind of auto adjust to cause you better chances to earn in good times while lesser chances to lose at the worst. It can beat the house edge and a bit of variance against us, very swiftly.

Some essentials to understand:

1.
The module has been tweaked to be made playable all over(betting every spin/hand)with the same stop loss i.e. 300 units. No triggers, no waiting for something to start, no pausing.

2. This method needs good number of chips. I advise one to have at least 300 chips as sessions bankroll and 3000 chips as lifetime bankroll. Although losing even 300 units, my way, is pretty unusual, positive gambling never makes anybody blind. Be prepared to face things that has not been seen to ruin your entire bankroll money too.Extremely Unlikely but not impossible.

3. To understand the full capacity of this system, check the  horror sessions provided in http://betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/anybody-think-such-bad-streak-can-be-won/

and also at:
http://betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/harsh-sessions-won-by-positive-gambling-module/

This methodology beats all of them or keeps unhurt in them. Every other method of playing will lose badly in each of them. If someone reverse engineers a particular bad session he will lose in all other as blue angel did.

4.I will provide all the rules of the method in writing with sufficient illustrations in excel. I will be available for chat support on gmail and skype too till one gets to understand every essential of it.

5. It is not meant for newbies or very aggressive daydreamers who wants to kill casinos or become millionaire overnight. This method earns slowly and patiently, hence recommended to experienced players only who are already playing regularly full time in casinos(land based or online) with sufficient bankroll and time.

6. One can play it online with RNG or live dealer or in a real casino. Play it in roulette or Baccarat. Basically meant for EC betting but can be modified to be played with any bet.

7.My methodology is not based on any gamblers' fallacy or myths or any mystical force that does not exist in real world but on logic and      probability.

8. My bets do not go sky high even in the worst of the worst cases. It is not risk thousands to earn 1 unit method. You can earn big units too. Fighting the worst possible cases is the speciality of this method.

9. Those playing for peanuts/cents/fun please avoid to contact me as it is meant for real gamblers who want to improve the way they play and enhance their pleasure of gambling along with increasing their chances to go home winner, at the end of the day and positively by the end of a week.

10. It is primarily for EC betting i.e. for playing Even, Odd, High, Low, Red. Black of roulette and Banker or Player of Baccarat or any other form of random gambling where chance to lose a bet is almost close to chance to win and payouts are similar too. Can be tried on sports betting with similar house edge EC betting. Those looking to play Baccarat, I would advise betting Player only.

11. It needs a bit of tracking, so choose casinos where if you write your notes on a sheet, none irritates or lurks too much. Better play online or automated roulette for the sake of privacy.

12. There will be no moneyback as you can not return back all the knowledge I am going to give you. In addition to that, there will be a Non Disclosure agreement between the buyer and me that he will not talk of the content in any public forum nor will he share the methodology anywhere.

13. There is no guarantee that you will win in each and every situation but I can guarantee you better gambling experience where any player playing will any other published method will lose hope of winning or even surviving. The method is primarily meant to safeguard the wash off of your money in tough times that empties most players. You will smile to see the so-called run from hell. I guarantee this.

14. Those who believe there is no way to win in long run by any mathematical/ mechanical approach, have a look at: http://betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/holy-grail-randomness-can-be-beaten-even-in-the-longest-run/

It is far better approach than that one now, possible to be done manually too.


This positive gambling module is the result of my years of playing, studying and researches and meant for purely random sessions where none can guess what will happen. It has an in-built filter that removes the worst possible scenarios or "run from the hell" spins and the Money management handles the rest in a manner which you can't even imagine.

Email me if you are willing to take my knowledge and improve your existing gambling skills and chances.
Remember, it is not for novice players or unemployed poor people who want their bread from it. It is meant for gamblers who are already into it for years and not on the verge of getting bankrupt.

Price of this module is fixed at Euro 1000 for now. May escalate soon.

Email: earnsumit@gmail.com telling me your experiences, bankroll, choice of casinos, table limits etc and how much do you target positively to earn a day.

Happy positive gambling.

If you take Ls as Ws and vice versa you will win even flat but that is not the motive of this. I want to see whether anybody has any strategy to cop so many losses and only average number of wins thereafter.
        Whatever betselection you choose you may encounter such bad phases. Question is how much you lose or win considering that as a bad session that crept in your favorite betselection.

Are you invited to join this community to put your affiliate business? You did not use email to spam but an open forum. Have you ever played what you are talking of? Can you put some screenshots of how much did you earn with that revelation?
                                  Bet365 is one of the worst bookies sucking money from many. How much is the commission that you sucked off people so far?

Quote from: esoito on May 22, 2016, 03:26:21 AM
"Try it out without real money and make your own mind"

OK....Anyone prepared to do just that?  And then post their results here?

[As long as it's not goal1, or one of his relatives or mates running the trial !  ]

Play a 10 step martingale after LLLLL, it will go as smooth to start with until it takes away all from your pockets.

How will someone do this without money? Sports betting sites have varying payouts and they do not provide fun money play with real odds, so far I saw them.

Horror session No.: 6      240 spins, 89 wins, 151 losses. First 100 spins have only 20 Wins
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W

               You are a bloody casino affiliate trying to fool very much mature gamblers who are members here. If it is so profitable and risk free, just play it one day yourself over 100s of football matches running whole day, compound and get your millions, in a day.
                                   Here we debate to how to earn a single unit, finally and you are showing us 7th sky in seven colors. Get your cart somewhere else. Send spam emails etc.

QuoteI am giving it free to allow everybody to try it and make his mind.

You may ask why?[/quote

here is the answer; http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/4314606/Open-internet-scam-by-casino-affiliates#.V0CYkfl97IU

What is so special about this finding? You just bet 3 fixed ECs constantly and simulate 3-4 samples of the same length i.e. 1,500,000. You will almost find the similar results without betting all the three ECs of the last number.

Is this finding giving you any edge?
Can you win flat bet this way?
Can this way of picking bets get you immune from bad stretches of losses?

I think all the answers will go in negative, being honest.
     Betselection doesn't make the difference, your MM strategy does.

Your only target is to fool people to lose faster and thereby earn your affiliate commission from bet365. Poor trick, I must tell you.

A promotion of Bet365. You win till you lose all system. It asks you to risk upto 50 units in a match to win a net profit by making 1 to 9 bets each at 10 minutes. Very bad. Kind of Martingale of Sports betting.

Law of large numbers, law of small numbers and Regression Towards the mean all have to be read together and not in isolation of each other.

Law of small numbers says that in a small sample size any type of bias is likely and variance can be monstrous with or against the player or house. It is very true when we see 25 streaks of Red or no hit of Black for 28 times in a sequence due to reds and 0s occupying all the hits.
Similarly, it can be very bad scenarios like only 24 hits of Red in last 100 spins or 65 only in last 200 spins. Pretty unbeatable with any of the progressions one can use and even 1 million chips are not enough to cover all the cases possible to win just one unit of profit.

Law of Large numbers says that in enough trials, the count of two EC counterparts will be somewhat equal to their mathematical expectancies.

Regression towards Mean says that after an extreme sample of variance, the next sample of equal length is more likely to not be so much biased and more likely to revert towards mean.

            All the three laws or theories are correct if read cautiously and we do not derive our own conclusions from them.

Regarding law of average, it is a pure fallacy that says, after bias towards an EC, gradually they achieve corrective wins and counts of both EC counterparts will be equal in a fair wheel.

           There is nothing like corrections. It may occur, it may not. Expecting corrective wins covering prior losses leads to play in the most erratic manner causing very big losses.

Asym,
             You started with a wrong direction. There is no equilibrium in a game of house edge as every bet is subjected to that and in long run, all bets will go far from equilibrium in terms of "extra losses". Variance can take them even more far. Even in a game without any house edge, a bet might not get equilibrium even after a billion trials.
               D'alembert is a classic comedy of errors and based on ideas that do not work in real life. It has no mathematical basis to make it a winner.

Thanks nick,
             Do you find any merit into that? Have you simulated that?

Can someone please point out what is so impressive or rather enticing about her posts? Anything worth noting?