Increasing in this manner doesn't help. Did you see the fate of Blue Angel's system? It tanked even hundreds of thousands. Azim's tracker prove that as well. How do you come up with loser ideas again and again. Increasing in patches of 37 or 100 or 1000 won't help.

Quote from: greenguy on April 12, 2016, 06:16:34 AM
By " incorporates all the harsh moments and ability to win in long run" do you mean a progression that never loses and never busts? One that eventually and always moves into profit no matter what?

Or do you mean a progression that busts from time to time but shows an overall profit for the long run?

It can be either way. It should not go bust in the long run after playing say 1000-2000 sessions or even more. It should be capable to surpass the harshest ever possible patches of too bad losses.

If anybody has a long run progression that incorporates all the harsh moments and ability to win in long run where only house edge remains as a constraint, he is a sure shot winner. That is the soul of a mathematical HG.

I have won about 40 no deposit bonuses so far but the most amazing came from betvoyager.com this time. They had a Goldfish Bonanza tournament on 7th, 8th and 9th of April 2016 whereby they distributed a hefty sum of E30k in prize money. I got lucky to win E100 as well.

Kudos betvoyager. My favorite casino.

[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]

I tried to define the so-called long run with context to roulette specifically here: http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400636/Long-run-in-gambling#.Vwck-_l97IU

Quote from: Azim on April 05, 2016, 06:01:15 AM
It wasn't 16000 for 1 spin it was 16000 for 37 spins.

Yeah, I said 16000+ bet per spin. There is no guarantee that even betting this big we can win. Indeed this method can even seek betting a million chips each spin at some point of time.

I won't mind betting 4 units for 37 spins to win 1 unit if there is any assurance of that win. If that 1 unit of earning ask me to bet 16,000+ unit per spin, I would mind, of course. We can win all data of world with infinite bets and martingale. Anybody interested in doing that?

Martingale never loses. It only sinks hundreds of thousands of units before winning back 1 unit but we can not consider it playable for that capacity.

My point is who can bet hundreds of thousands of units of bets to win 1 unit on an EC and which casino will allow someone even if someone is crazy enough

to do so?

Thanks a tonne, Azim. My humble excel tracker proved the same but since too big claims were made regarding the greatness of this delayed martingale, as Blue Angel proposed it to work, your tracker removes all the doubts.

              Simulations are the best way to conclude an argument.

I reiterate: No way of picking bet is superior to any other. All will get good, bad, best and the worst moments.

Ok. I got your tracker working on my system. I simulated the attached file of 5k spins and found this result:

End balance:+7867

Max balance: +7873

Max bet= 16384

Worst drawdown point: -74600

Lol

Azim, can you confirm the same please?

P.S.: I confirmed this way back through my excel tracker that this progression is kind of a joke and only with endless hypothetical bets, one can play this.

Your program seeks an activation key. Where is that?

Quote from: Azim on April 03, 2016, 07:23:05 PM
Sorry Victor.

Follow the link on this thread  and you will see an application. Load spins from anywhere and you will see the outcome for yourself.

  I do not see any link here. Either post it or PM or email me.

Azim, can you handle the all 5 horror sessions?

                        Many fellow members here start to jump up and down when they see these "horror sessions" and instead of accepting that such stretches will destroy whatever they suppose as winners claim that their bets are safe from such stretches which is nothing sort of foolish. A few more clever people say, if such stretches ever come, we will not play them all. My dear friends such stretches could come together even in many sessions that you play even if you jump at seeing LLLL otherwise try to play a martingale in whichever manner you wish, you will soon bleed to death. "Hit and Run" doesn't safeguard us from anything otherwise we all would have opted that only.
                 If you are not capable to simulate your bet yourself you can be fall for such fallacious claims and ultimately fool yourself to a big loss. Many even ask that can they change the bet and L/Ws thereby then I can only laugh at the childish approach of trying to do good or average bets only or a wrong expectation or assumption of any particular bet being very safe from these spins from hell. They are inevitable. Think over them and work out strategies keeping such encounters in mind.

Horror session 5:     Losses 94, wins 52 . It has a superbad stretch in the beginning of 4 wins in 44 trials which is 5.2 SD below the mean. Extreme of the extreme.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W

Quote from: BetJack on March 18, 2016, 01:53:04 AM
Hello.
I may have missed the post...
Can anybody tell me what happened in The End
Blue_Angel did make all 10k SPINS
And what is the
outcome?

His method fails if you can see the excel simulator. If you have the balls to bet even 100k bets to win 1 unit, you may try his way. It will bust the same way as classical martingale do.