Nice example of playing upon fallacies and dangerous progressions. A surefire "abetment to suicide" thing. 

            A single dozen can keep hitting till 12-15 spins, in a row and along with 0/00 can prolong the un hit double dozens even further. In those cases, even a billionaire will feel like a beggar.

Quoteif a doubleloss occurs, always tripple bets.

Icing on the cake. 

"Law of averages" is expecting"law of large numbers" to work in short span, which is of course a fallacy. I must say that "law of averages" has caused the biggest losses to lesser educated gamblers than anything else. This fallacy is mainly responsible for unwise money management techniques like martingale, labouchere etc in gambling wherein one can risk entire money on earth to win just 1 unit and still without any guarantee to win back that 1 unit.
              To understand both concepts clearly, you may refer to this:- http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/17231561/Reality-of-Law-of-large-numbers#.VIaoD9KUdA4

@DRAZEN OR ANYBODY ELSE

The horror session given looks quite messy even in wordpad. Can it be synchronized, so that it fits in a single column of excel?

After doing no deposit bonuses, I am thinking of taking deposit bonus challenges too. Do you know any good casino offering a reasonable wagering on bonuses? If a casino gives 100% bonus on my deposit (atleast 1000 units) and offer a wagering of upto 20x on entire amount (deposit+bonus) I will take that gladly.

Thanks for all the support and good words.
                   With persistence, one can move even mountains. My posts depicting win over worst number of Zumma american book, 10 millions spins beaten by Ophis bot and all books of zumma of roulette and baccarat beaten are only meant to prove that hey, there are still ways to do that. My countless wins over no deposit bonuses playing mostly slots are, I think, kind of unthinkable by a common player. When I posted my sports picks, you can see the success ratio yourself.
                      Many  people feel it like teasing but it could be an inspiration too. Whenever someone says you that hey casinos are destined to win, show him my feats. To achieve all this, thousands of excel sheets and dozens of trackers/bots were used. i have given myself to do full time researches on gambling and then I am capable of doing something that is considered impossible.
                      Forget martingale, fibonacci, Labouchere, D'alembert and all other ideas that were created centuries ago and they were nothing more than bad jokes for casino gaming. You won't get the secret formula anywhere, you have to own it. Analyse the game deeply, understand the basics, test your ideas and maybe you get tenfold successful than me.

FMoDR was the finest way for me about 4 years back. Now I have concepts that can beat randomness in its worst form.

Thanks Captain.
               I  feel myself a "randomness expert" too but people feel it isn't possible.  Playing with randomness is not like plying with fire, it is only like playing a piano.

3-4 hours.

Finally, I could clear this titanic job and I have E252 to withdraw. 

             Hope to get it without any trouble since this casino is new for me.
[attachimg=1]

32nd No Deposit Bonus Win:

It was slotser.com. I got certain 1 cent free spins on a slot, that generated E12.89 . With this small amount I had to make a playthrough of E 1547, that too, it is purely slot casino having only 7-8 slot games to play. I laughed at it, as it looked too much to me. Toughest condition ever. I played very calmly and rushed my balance over E100 first, wagering E500+ first.
                             Then I got some hope of winning and took this screenshot for records:
[attachimg=1]

Simulating any "system" through a real wheel at home or play with historical sessions data or from random.org, all are same. You only need to study the wheel for physics based "advantage play".

Quote from: Mr J on November 24, 2014, 04:22:36 AM
"The moral of the story is: quitting when ahead offers no advantage whatsoever" >>> I have to admit, this has crossed my mind SEVERAL times.

PERHAPS?.... the only real way to "win", is to walk into the casino for the FIRST time, win (hopefully) we'll say $100, leave and NEVER play the game again?

Ken   

Even better idea is to go with a rich friend and ask him to bet only twice with a huge sum to check his luck. If he wins he will buy you drinks and if he loses, he will beg you to have drink with him.
               The moral of the story is: Don't think of gambling, if you can not afford to lose money. Consider the gaming table a monster that will eat all your buy-ins and if u r prepared for that, go for it otherwise let other gamble and cheer for them.

May be this can help you a little: http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/4332355/How-to-fight-with-the-worst-enemy-of-gamblingVariance

P.S.: Please stop your heyhey. It is more annoying than impressive.

67 Losses  vs 83 wins (what I could count out of your given series)

Not so huge. It is about 1.63 SD

Possible in a stretch but not a regular thing to happen with any bet.

I think, there is some blunder in tracking w/l. Such wins vs losses are next to impossible. Patrik, you know SD calculation and can understand the probability of getting such ratio urself.