Labby and fibonacci are failures in all their forms as martingale. In the given series of losses and wins, it finishes with 4 Wins and 2 Losses in last 6 spins/hands. Every progression has a limit where it appears the best. When adverse cases comes, it bites dust. By looking at the series, it is evident that he is not betting every spin, since his bankroll is not moving up/down in every step.

                     It is very strange that he is showing reduction of bankroll in the last step, where he has a win. From +5 in second last to +4 at last, while both are wins.

He has just put a link of a system for free. Why bash him?

We recognize him as Bayes, for long long time. Since vlsroulette days. Truth may look bitter or boring but is still better than false assumptions.

I would like Bayes to come as Bayes again with the same avatar of Bayes.

I love two things from Scotland. Scotch Whisky and Butter scotch flavor. [smiley]aes/martini.png[/smiley] [smiley]aes/wine.png[/smiley][smiley]aes/tongue.png[/smiley]

Casino is definitely a battleground but I take it as battle on chess board where strategy is the most important thing. This battle needs a calm and calculative brain and aggression or worries will only have negative impact.

I do not want to cut-paste, please read the topic here: http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400624/Before-you-try-to-play-with-any-system#.VBvCV5SSxA4

I don't have X(no) factor, I do have Y(Yeah)factor.

QuoteReading the posts is practically given that Slacker is Bayes.

I feel the same. Atleast someone alike. I consider Bayes to be one of the most reasonable person on any forum. He was like a simplified encyclopedia on gambling related mathematics.

Quote from: Superman on September 15, 2014, 06:35:28 AM
windows phone, Iphone android, all easy to code for BUT more difficult and takes longer, why would you want it coded just for android, wouldn't it be better to just code in RX or similar?

Android is the most popular and it can be used in a casino too. Also easier to use in live dealer casinos online.

Do we have anybody skilled enough to do this?

@Mohit,
              Your bet of 6 numbers doesn't go past 12 spins ever??????????????
If it is so, just keep a bankroll of 22x6 =132 units and bet like this:
1) Bet: $ 1
2) Bet: $ 1
3) Bet: $ 1
4) Bet: $ 1
5) Bet: $ 1
6) Bet: $ 1
7) Bet: $ 2
8) Bet: $ 2
9) Bet: $ 2
10) Bet: $ 3
11) Bet: $ 3
12) Bet: $ 4

Remember the 5% event will kill you in more cases  than A and B. MM can be suggested if you elaborate your bet.

@ND,
             It is not about 0 bankroll. 0 means the beginning of the game and the balance could be shown in negative for the sake of testing. All figures in positive may show wins and likewise, negative figures may show losses with relation to 0.

Next Shoe: 6th September
[attachimg=1]