Without the use of a software and by approximating at best the various patterns happening itlr, one of the infallible approach to get an edge is by wagering toward triples and 4s streaks by adopting a specific random walk.
Providing to use the old clustering/isolated effect taking care of a very unlikely symmetrical results distribution (results distribution and not card distribution).
In fact, 3 and 4 streaks must more likely come out as clustered or isolating a superior (5/5+) streak.
Therefore 5/5+ streaks situations once had surpassed the isolated cutoff point (so showing up clustered between 3 or 4 streaks) aren't chasable anymore.
Of course when putting into an infinite fight 3 and 4 streaks vs 5/5+ streaks, singles and doubles will become as ininfluent (neutral).
Here's a live sample where our random walk was following the above supposedly propensity.
3 and 4 streaks were played until a loss (5/5+ streak) or played just one time after a 5/5+ streak. The process restarts after a 3 or 4 streak happening.
Obviously a + sign is a +1 unit and any - sign is a -3 unit.
Notice the sd values.
- + + +
+ + + + + + + +
- + + + + + +
+ - + + -
+ + -
- +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + + + -
+ + + +
- + + + + + -
+ + - -
+ + + + + + +
+ + + - -
+ + +
+ + + - +
+ + + + -
+ + - -
+ + + - +
+ + + + + -
+ + + + + + +
- +
+ + + + + -
+ - + + +
+ - + + + +
+ + + + - -
- -
+ + -
+ + + + + + + -
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + - + + +
- + + + -
- + + +
- + + + + + + (-1)
+ + - + - +
+ + - + -
+ - - + -
+ - + + + (-1)
+ + + +
- + -
-
+ + + + + +
+ - +
- -
+ + + -
- -
+ - (-1)
+ + - + +
+ + + -
- + + + + -
+ + + + + + + + -
+ + - + + +
+ + + + +
+ + +
+ + + -
+ + + + +
+ + + + - + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + - + + +
- + + + +
+ + + + + +
- + + +
+ + - +
+ + + + +
+ - - -
- + - -
+ + + - +
+ +
+ + + + -
+ + - + +
- + -
+ + +
- + + + -
+ - + + +
- + + + + +
- + + - - +
- + - + +
+ + - + + +
- + + -
+ + + + +
- + + + +
+ + - + + + (-1)
+ + + +
- - + + + + +
- + - -
+ + - + + + +
+ + + + + (-1)
+ + + - + + +
+ - + - -
+ - + +
+ -
+ - -
+ + +
+ + + -
- - (-1)
+ + -
+ + + (-1)
+ + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + -
+ + + + -
- +
+ + - -
+ + + + + +
- + + + + + +
+ + -
-
+ - + +
+ - + + -
- + + -
+ + + + + -
+ + + - -
+ + - +
+ + + - -
+ + + + - +
+ + + + + - + + +
+ - + +
- - + +
+ + + - + (-1)
- -
+ + + + - -
+ + - -
+ + +
+ - - + + -
+ + + + + +
- + + + +
- + - -
+ + + + +
- - +
- -
+ - +
+ + + - + +
+ + + - + +
- + - -
+ + + + - +
+ + - -
+ + - -
+ - + +
+ + + - -
- + - + - + +
+ + + - (-1)
+ - -
+ + + + + + -
+ + + - + + +
+ + + - + + +
- + + + -
+ + + + +
+ + + (-1)
+ + + + +
- + + +
+ + + + + +
- + +
+ - + - +
+ - - +
+ + + + (-1)
+ + + + +
- + + + + +
- + - +
- + - + - + +
+ + + + + + -
+ - + - +
- + + -
+ + + + + + -
+ + + + + + -
+ - + + + + + (-1)
- + + +
- + +
+ + + - +
+ + + + +
+ + + + - + + + +
- + + - -
+ + - -
+ + - + + + (sh. 61.260)
Such +/- distributions speak for themselves.
You know very well I'm not selling anything here, just trying to say that this game could be beatable by exploiting its flaws, that is by negating the beloved "coin flip" nature stated by experts of our a$$.
Are we wrong? Good, casinos have plenty of money to challenge us. LOL
as.
Providing to use the old clustering/isolated effect taking care of a very unlikely symmetrical results distribution (results distribution and not card distribution).
In fact, 3 and 4 streaks must more likely come out as clustered or isolating a superior (5/5+) streak.
Therefore 5/5+ streaks situations once had surpassed the isolated cutoff point (so showing up clustered between 3 or 4 streaks) aren't chasable anymore.
Of course when putting into an infinite fight 3 and 4 streaks vs 5/5+ streaks, singles and doubles will become as ininfluent (neutral).
Here's a live sample where our random walk was following the above supposedly propensity.
3 and 4 streaks were played until a loss (5/5+ streak) or played just one time after a 5/5+ streak. The process restarts after a 3 or 4 streak happening.
Obviously a + sign is a +1 unit and any - sign is a -3 unit.
Notice the sd values.
- + + +
+ + + + + + + +
- + + + + + +
+ - + + -
+ + -
- +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + + + -
+ + + +
- + + + + + -
+ + - -
+ + + + + + +
+ + + - -
+ + +
+ + + - +
+ + + + -
+ + - -
+ + + - +
+ + + + + -
+ + + + + + +
- +
+ + + + + -
+ - + + +
+ - + + + +
+ + + + - -
- -
+ + -
+ + + + + + + -
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + - + + +
- + + + -
- + + +
- + + + + + + (-1)
+ + - + - +
+ + - + -
+ - - + -
+ - + + + (-1)
+ + + +
- + -
-
+ + + + + +
+ - +
- -
+ + + -
- -
+ - (-1)
+ + - + +
+ + + -
- + + + + -
+ + + + + + + + -
+ + - + + +
+ + + + +
+ + +
+ + + -
+ + + + +
+ + + + - + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + - + + +
- + + + +
+ + + + + +
- + + +
+ + - +
+ + + + +
+ - - -
- + - -
+ + + - +
+ +
+ + + + -
+ + - + +
- + -
+ + +
- + + + -
+ - + + +
- + + + + +
- + + - - +
- + - + +
+ + - + + +
- + + -
+ + + + +
- + + + +
+ + - + + + (-1)
+ + + +
- - + + + + +
- + - -
+ + - + + + +
+ + + + + (-1)
+ + + - + + +
+ - + - -
+ - + +
+ -
+ - -
+ + +
+ + + -
- - (-1)
+ + -
+ + + (-1)
+ + + + +
+ + + + + -
+ + + -
+ + + + -
- +
+ + - -
+ + + + + +
- + + + + + +
+ + -
-
+ - + +
+ - + + -
- + + -
+ + + + + -
+ + + - -
+ + - +
+ + + - -
+ + + + - +
+ + + + + - + + +
+ - + +
- - + +
+ + + - + (-1)
- -
+ + + + - -
+ + - -
+ + +
+ - - + + -
+ + + + + +
- + + + +
- + - -
+ + + + +
- - +
- -
+ - +
+ + + - + +
+ + + - + +
- + - -
+ + + + - +
+ + - -
+ + - -
+ - + +
+ + + - -
- + - + - + +
+ + + - (-1)
+ - -
+ + + + + + -
+ + + - + + +
+ + + - + + +
- + + + -
+ + + + +
+ + + (-1)
+ + + + +
- + + +
+ + + + + +
- + +
+ - + - +
+ - - +
+ + + + (-1)
+ + + + +
- + + + + +
- + - +
- + - + - + +
+ + + + + + -
+ - + - +
- + + -
+ + + + + + -
+ + + + + + -
+ - + + + + + (-1)
- + + +
- + +
+ + + - +
+ + + + +
+ + + + - + + + +
- + + - -
+ + - -
+ + - + + + (sh. 61.260)
Such +/- distributions speak for themselves.
You know very well I'm not selling anything here, just trying to say that this game could be beatable by exploiting its flaws, that is by negating the beloved "coin flip" nature stated by experts of our a$$.
Are we wrong? Good, casinos have plenty of money to challenge us. LOL
as.