Even if I like Walt Whitman US writer, I don't want to be contradictory about what I've written so far: that is simple W or L situations happening when a strict mechanical strategy works out cannot provide a valuable edge.
Yet let's see what are the results of a 'bet W after a single L' plan did on the previous samples:
It's a +23 unit (before vig) result.
Summary.
W= +1, L= -3, triggers are any L not following another L and of course we'll bet one time toward a W.
I'm not stating this is an 'optimal' strategy to look for, I'm just saying that this is one of the wonderful opportunities to get the best of it at baccarat. Of course getting the least impact of variance.
Why should that be true?
Again the answer relies upon the average card distribution happening at every shoe dealt. making 'unrandom' certain pattern successions showing up at some points of interest, that is such spots are fully beatable.
Add this to the fact that the vast majority of shoes dealt are affected by an intrinsic defect of randomness: yesterday, now and in the future.
oOoOo
Playing baccarat is just as wagering into a 'biased' coin flip finite succession, where there two kind of 'biases':
- a general steady math bias (general asymmetrical probability favoring B);
- a more important actual 'bias' coming out from the actual card (unrandom) distribution, privileging some patterns than others.
Needless to say that such features cannot mock an independent 'coin flipping' game unless dictated by coincidence.
Thus, we know without any shadow of doubt that the coin will be heavier or lighter in some points of the shoe, naturally knowing that at the most situations our coin will be 'equally' balanced considering all opposite forces, meaning it will be unbeatable.
So forget to try to guess every hand dealt as most hands fall into the 'pure coin flip' unbeatable category.
Whenever you'd think a given line (and there are innumerable r.w.'s to look for) seems to reach a valuable deviated ratio (especially after many no valuable patterns had shown up), bet this line by a 0.75% probability in order to prolong it just by one step.
But the better feature to look for is the 'complexity' of such patterns, so the more complex a searched pattern is, better are the probabilities to catch a winning hand along the way.
It's now that the 'clustered' factor will take its primary role over the possible outcomes.
as.
Yet let's see what are the results of a 'bet W after a single L' plan did on the previous samples:
It's a +23 unit (before vig) result.
Summary.
W= +1, L= -3, triggers are any L not following another L and of course we'll bet one time toward a W.
I'm not stating this is an 'optimal' strategy to look for, I'm just saying that this is one of the wonderful opportunities to get the best of it at baccarat. Of course getting the least impact of variance.
Why should that be true?
Again the answer relies upon the average card distribution happening at every shoe dealt. making 'unrandom' certain pattern successions showing up at some points of interest, that is such spots are fully beatable.
Add this to the fact that the vast majority of shoes dealt are affected by an intrinsic defect of randomness: yesterday, now and in the future.
oOoOo
Playing baccarat is just as wagering into a 'biased' coin flip finite succession, where there two kind of 'biases':
- a general steady math bias (general asymmetrical probability favoring B);
- a more important actual 'bias' coming out from the actual card (unrandom) distribution, privileging some patterns than others.
Needless to say that such features cannot mock an independent 'coin flipping' game unless dictated by coincidence.
Thus, we know without any shadow of doubt that the coin will be heavier or lighter in some points of the shoe, naturally knowing that at the most situations our coin will be 'equally' balanced considering all opposite forces, meaning it will be unbeatable.
So forget to try to guess every hand dealt as most hands fall into the 'pure coin flip' unbeatable category.
Whenever you'd think a given line (and there are innumerable r.w.'s to look for) seems to reach a valuable deviated ratio (especially after many no valuable patterns had shown up), bet this line by a 0.75% probability in order to prolong it just by one step.
But the better feature to look for is the 'complexity' of such patterns, so the more complex a searched pattern is, better are the probabilities to catch a winning hand along the way.
It's now that the 'clustered' factor will take its primary role over the possible outcomes.
as.