Now just to move my early thoughts on a bit.

[attachimg=1]

The next number out was 15 which was one of the 19 unhit numbers. What I have done is to block out the first number after this result which was the 22 because I want to see what happens if I am constantly working with 18 hit vs 19 unhit numbers.

*what characteristics will form recording like this?

*could it be a way to isolate hot numbers?

These are the things I am studying at the moment.

Here is something to get the ball rolling and give us something to think about.

[attachimg=1]

There are 22 spins in the picture above with 4 repeats. (so 18 originals) It's a bit like G.U.T. with the 'first crossing' 19 unhit vs 18 hit.

Now here is my thought/question. If the LOTT averages 24 originals in a 37 spin cycle and it has already produced 18 originals, why would I want to bet the 19 unhit. On average, only 6 more of those 19 are going to appear in the next 15 spins.(admittedly some will maybe come twice or more)......but it's something to think about/study.

As I stated in esoito's thread, I am in the middle of revisiting the Law of the Third. I like to go back from time to time and see if I can look at things in a slightly different way from before using any new knowledge/understanding/insights that I have picked up.

The LOTT has always fascinated me after reading posters like 'Number 6' and 'Dyksexlic'. It is however a bit of a slippery customer and just when I thought I was getting somewhere, poof, the magic vanished. Hopefully that was just my inexperience.

So this thread is an invitation to anyone who wants to help try and crack this LOTT once and for all. At the end of the day, there is nothing to lose except a bit of free time and everything to gain (even if just adding a bit of new knowledge). So please join in and let's have some fun with it.

Hello Juslucky and welcome to the forum. It's great to see someone else likes the 'goose'.

Thank you for compiling all of this information esoito. I am in the middle of taking another look at the law of the third and having this as a reference will come in handy. They were some awesome quotes in there from 'Number6'. He certainly makes you think about the game on more than one level.

cheers

I do this quite often if I have made my money for the day and had a dinner (but want to kill an extra half hour or so). I can't be bothered getting out the heavy armoury again and so just walk up to a table and ad lib a bit for 20-30 minutes before I go home.

8 groups of numbers on the wheel.

1,3,5,7,9
2,4,6,8,10
11,13,15,17
12,14,16,18
19,21,23,25,27
20,22,24,26,28
29,31,33,35
30,32,34,36

Today's card from table 1.

[attachimg=1]

One of these groups has to be appearing and only interspersed by the odd number from it's own colour.

so take the 19,21,23,25,27 group.

It runs.....

27
19
(14)
19 *
(36)
19**
(18)
21
27*
19***
(12)
25
(34)
27**
27***

What I notice is that you either get the group appearing with one or two dominant numbers from the group (ie....the 19 or 27 in this case) or you will get the whole set completing itself....so 19,21,23,25,27 all appearing.

It's a low outlay bet and can make a very quick killing if things fall into place.

cheers

I am not going to bash it until I understand it. However I did notice one obvious mistake which is a bit alarming.

[attachimg=1]

Number 20 obviously belongs to column L and not column K. You wouldn't expect such a mistake.

cheers

Thanks for your comments Gizmo, I haven't read it yet. It looks convoluted at first glance.

Hello guys,

Anyone remember Don Colonne and his Roulette DNA theory. Well I didn't know that he has another publication out now called ''Ruin the City of Las Vegas''

In fact just reading the beginning of this e-book, Don states that his first method failed (I imagine that's the DNA of Roulette one) and this is his new work.

It's free and here it is. Thanks Don. Always appreciated when people share their hard work.

http://www.neworiginalthinking.com/EBOOK-RCLV.pdf

Quote from: 3Nine on August 18, 2016, 11:53:54 PM
Ok, you're still not seeing it.

VdW is not needed - at all.

3Nine is right. VDW can't help you right out of the box and it's pretty pointless in reality if you already have the framework in place to win. I suppose what I am saying is that you would pretty much already need to know how to win before you could come up with some convoluted way to use VDW. So what's the point? It's good in a sense however to stretch the old brain a bit.

Hello Vic,

To get the ball rolling and enter into the spirit of things, here is my contribution.

Cheers

Quote from: james on August 18, 2016, 01:23:14 AM
Is there any selection that is most suitable for "The Boxer"?

I would say finding a selection for Baccarat might work best because of it's streaky nature at times. The thing with streaks though is that you may have to go looking/manufacture them with your own ideas to get a steady supply of opportunities.

Just as an example, I like to work out my Baccarat bets by taking 4 decisions at a time and then looking for different types of streaks grouping them into pairs.

[attachimg=1]

So the 4 decisions in chronological order are P, B, B, P. But you can have up to 6 different pairs to try and spot different types of streaks.

cheers

It's a good question and funny that it came up because I have given this a lot of thought recently.

I think you need a combination of both bet selection and MM. Both of which may go through different phases during your session. Gizmo has really hit the nail on the head with the three states. 1) Working. 2) Holding it's own. 3) Not working. You can use this for both bet selection and MM. I also find it works best over short games. Not necessarily because I believe in hit and run, but because I think you reach a certain point in the spin count where you can have too much information if you are looking at a lot of different stuff and why make things more complicated for yourself.

That's right Tomla. It's more aggressive and less forgiving than the Mongoose....but if you have something which can be very streaky, then using this can be good as well.

Here is a page from the Wizard of Odds with the payout table.

https://wizardofodds.com/games/double-ball-roulette/