The next 100 spins was one of those games where you would need to bring a fresh set of clothes 

Losing strings of 5, 6 and 8 were littered through these set of spins.

The highest bet placed was 61 units.

But it did recover in just a few spins!

(I will see if I can replay the string using Roulette Player's idea)

cheers

Hello Roulette Player

Thanks for the further suggestions. I did not save the numbers and so won't be able to replay them.

however....when I get some time later today...I will test another set of spins with the different set of ideas and see how it goes.

cheers

Quote from: esoito on December 07, 2013, 06:19:27 AM


I expect to lose the lot because the BVNZ software will ensure that will happen by rigging the numbers.

esoito

Would you care to give your opinion on how they will do this taking the 'randomness control' feature into account.

It seems to me that the only thing they can do is send a 'rogue' set of spins in the beginning and not interfere once you are playing through the string.

I think it bugs a lot of us. 

cheers

I played another 100 spins and the highest bet placed was 16 units.

There were a couple of occasions when your idea (Roulette Player) saved me!

I like this progression with the bet selection. You could do worse if you had 100 units to have a flutter with.

cheers

Thank you for the suggestion Roulette Player.

Those 'terrible two's' have a nasty habit of creeping up on a player.

I like DBL...it handles streaks and chops ok, and throwing your idea into the mix can only help improve things.

cheers

Just messing around with RX and thought I would test this progression with DBL (decision before last) on the E/C's.

The progression itself is simple....+1 on a win or loss until you reach a new high.

It always seems to go well when I give it a quick blast.

The danger with DBL would be a string of 'terrible two's' alternating.

This quick test did reach a 20 unit bet once! It needs a decent B/R and a strong constitution!

cheers

Here it is Sputnik

A good way is to grab a few spins from here and there and then it becomes your own personal permanence.

It's a bit of a pain but goes some way to achieving what you are suggesting esoito.

You could take spins from...

Spielbank..Dublinbet..Smartlive..Betvoyager..Random.org etc..and the Italian roulette website has a gazillion spins from different casinos. (it's actually 7,527,056) 

http://www.laroulette.it/risorse/permanenzimetro/folder_listing

cheers

Hello akuq

To win consistently...the most important aspect is to learn not to lose (much) and let the wins take care of themself. Be that 5%..10% or whatever.

10% of a bankroll is not a small amount. I would find it near impossible to consistently win 10%. It is a nice thought....but I think anybody would be setting themself up for failure and doing serious damage to their bankroll if this was the benchmark every game.

Accept small wins and break even games as all part of the process and you can do well.

cheers

This site discusses a few of the AP plays that you would likely find in the 'Beyond Counting' notes.

The Dragon side bet on Baccarat which gives the player a small edge in optimal conditions is an interesting article.

http://apheat.net/2012/08/12/card-counting-the-dragon-bonus-baccarat-side-bet/

cheers.

UPDATE...

I  withdrew my winnings several days ago and received them today.

They did not even ask me to produce any documents which was cool.

So a 3 day turnaround is not that bad really.

Definately one to put on the 'approved' list. I also noticed a lot of good remarks on the 'casinomeister' forum and they have a rep there who seems pretty helpful.

cheers.

Deposited £10 for a 200% bonus.

So £30 to play on slots.

I hit this little beauty on a 0.40p stake [smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]


[attachimg=1]

My apologies Warrior!

Quote from: XXVV on November 25, 2013, 10:03:06 PM




Nevertheless it is on my bookshelf because of the compressed wisdom therein in spite of its shortcomings.

Hello XXVV

That is the best aspect of the book. It is obviously written by someone who has a good understanding of casinos.

I also like the quotes from famous people to start each chapter.

In fact....the best quote in my opinion is from David Sklansky.

''The pro knows to play by the month rather than by the day''

cheers

2 of the main reasons why I would not play this for real money.

1) I don't like methods that don't include the 0/00 (apart from as a hedge bet)

The 0/00 comprises of 2.7% the same as any other number on the wheel.

Any method is leaving itself open to attack by ignoring the 0/00.

I don't buy all this hedge the 0/00 nonsense. What if I am playing black and the 27/30 split starts appearing?
Do I start hedging the 27/30. Where does it end?


2) I don't like a method that tries to predict what's coming up in 10 spins time.

Let's say you are betting B after the qualification process.

The next 5 numbers are.....

15
31
16
5
13*

ok....so now you are in business betting B for the next 3 spins.

This process could have covered 13 spins from start to finish.

IMO, you can't claim an edge by predicting 10+ spins in advance using a mechanical method.

You might as well tell me what next week's lottery numbers are.

An edge is more likely to be achieved on a spin by spin basis IMO.


These are just my reasons why I would not play this method with real cash.

Don't let that put you off from testing or playing it.

It was 30 units up after 1,500 spins (not 1,500 placed bets) So this in no way represents any large testing data.

cheers [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

Sputnik

I have tested 1,500 spins in total on a single 0 wheel!

It is slightly ahead. I won't be playing it for real money.

cheers