part 4. [smiley]aes/coffee.png[/smiley]

part 3 and time for lunch. [smiley]aes/eat.png[/smiley]

Quote from: Chrisbis on July 18, 2013, 08:28:03 AM
Its called "covering your a s s"..............[smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]

lol.

They have obviously learned their lesson the hard way.

A court ruling forced them to pay out a large sum previously because the winning players were deemed not to have tampered with the equipment even though they had an edge ('cheated' in Ritz parlance).

I was looking at their new flashy website the other day and found something interesting. (By the way, it is a lovely site with some really good pictures)

What I found interesting was in the 'rules of membership'

Here we go....

12. The Company reserves the right not to pay any gaming debt in circumstances where it knows or reasonably suspects that a member has won money by way of cheating. For the purpose of this rule 'cheating' includes any conduct which seeks to remove or reduce the element of chance and or seeks to give any advantage to the player. The Company shall have absolute discretion in deciding whether any activity amounts to cheating and also as to whether any such activity has taken place.

13. Any decision of the Company under these rules shall be conclusive and binding. It is a term and condition of membership that no legal proceedings shall be instituted by any member to challenge the ruling of the Company.


Talk about having your cake and eating it.

I think you are right AMK. Betting aggressively can have its place.

My belief is that you are only limited by how you interpretate the data which is in front of you. A horror session to one player could possibly be another players biggest ever win. A dynamic game such as roulette certainly requires having more than just one bet selection.  It requires an arsenal of interchangeable ways of playing. It's not just semantics either. We need to be careful not to limit what is achievable by having fixed ideas.

Part 2. [smiley]aes/pizza.png[/smiley] I hate those 'go compare' adverts, lol.

Eliminator method!

Please move this if you don't think it fits in this thread.

Thanks!

mmm... new smilies [smiley]aes/party.png[/smiley]

Saw this on ebay today!

[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=2]

[attachimg=3]

The odds are not so good. 

3/1 for a six line will have you broke in no time.

A nice toy if you have the room for it. The weight of it is 285 kilos.

What I propose to do is make some video tutorials.

I can use Betvoyager and Notepad for that.

Then I will play a few sessions at some of the live casinos. (smartlive + dublin)

I have that WM recorder that TCS uses for his videos. It is clear as a bell compared to all the other screen recorders out there.

The hardest part of system design is turning complexity into simplicity. This gives you breathing space to think about what you are doing. So I am going to show how I have wrapped everything into a playable and most importantly winning method.

It doesn't really work IMO explaining different ideas and then expecting someone to put the pieces together. You need to actually see everything in operation.

You will be able to go over the tutorials and videos at your own pace and will pick up what's going on.

cheers

Just as a note of caution reading the 'terms + conditions' at Joyland.

[attachimg=1]

Casinos don't like low risk wagering on bonus money and WILL lock accounts if they see you playing this way. A lot of players used to do it with Blackjack playing basic strategy assuming that they had a good chance to keep most of the bonus money even after playing through the requirements.

It would be a shame to risk losing something that you have obviously worked hard for.

 Hello Vic! Thank you very much for taking the time to create a tracker for my idea.

I have to be honest and say that the original version did not hold up as well as what I thought it would with some of the other concepts when used in tandem.

It had to be played about with a bit. The following is the modified version. It is not miles away from the original. The only real difference is that I try and just have one of either the Dozen or Column as the furthest back rather than a Dozen and a Column combined as the furthest back. There is one exception which you will see below. The improvement in performance is considerable.

3 = 1C

24 = 2C

32 = 3B  (The A is the furthest back. 'column A')

25 = 3A (So the furthest back A appeared. The new furthest back is the 1. 'dozen 1')

18 = 2C (The furthest back is still the 1. 'dozen 1')

24 = 2C (The furthest back is still the 1. 'dozen 1')

So how would all this look.

03 = 1C
24 = 2C
32 = 3B (A)
25 = 3A (1) (O)
18 = 2C (1) (S)
24 = 2C (1) (S)

Obviously the (O) and (S) stand for OPPOSITE and SAME.

Looking at the short example above, you can see that the furthest back A changed on the very next spin and the 1 became the furthest back. So the (O) stands for OPPOSITE.

The 1 stayed as the furthest back for the next two spins and therefore remained the same and that is represented by the (S)

There is one exception which you can see below if I continue with the numbers.

03 = 1C
24 = 2C
32 = 3B (A)
25 = 3A (1) (O)
18 = 2C (1) (S)
24 = 2C (1) (S)
35 = 3B (1) (S)
21 = 2C (1) (S)
03 = 1C (A) (O)
35 = 3B (A) (S)
28 = 3A (2) (O)
18 = 2C (1) (O)
28 = 3A (1) (S)
33 = 3C (1) (S)
08 = 1B (2) (O)
20 = 2B (A) (O)
25 = 3A (C) (O)
03 = 1C (2B) (O)  Here you see the furthest back is not either a single dozen or single column. It appears as 2B.
23 = 2B (3A) (O)  Once again, the furthest back can't be represented by a single dozen or single column. It appears as 3A.
07 = 1A (3) (O)  The A appeared this time leaving the 3 (dozen 3) as the furthest back. I still count it as a (O) because it changed from the 3A to the 3. This does not happen that often where you get both a dozen and column as the furthest back. You normally get either a dozen or column.

This is slightly different to the original version I proposed to Vic. This way is definitely an improvement when allied with a few other concepts. I did promise I would share the method if Vic had the time to produce a tracker. I will keep my word.

Thanks once again Vic for going to the time and trouble. It is appreciated.

 
I was looking around the net today for roulette stuff that I had not seen before and found this thing.

It is a neat little simulator which tests systems.

http://www.woodger.ca/roul/roul_awt.htm

Watching the little sliding arrow down the bottom gives you a rough idea as to what's happening when it is crunching through all the numbers.

cheers

AI will be the way forward.

Look at how 'deep blue' defeated Gary Kasparov. I think Kasparov won the first challenge and then got beaten in the rematch by an improved version.

Quote from: JohnLegend on April 11, 2013, 03:59:34 PM
My mother had a stroke 10 years ago and made a very good recovery and has had no more. She exchanged 10 cups of coffee a day for as many green teas.

And I myself swear by it.

Thanks John.

I did use to drink a lot of Green tea with mint and also a lot of Evian water. All my mates used to take the mick saying it was like drinking paint stripper, lol.

I will take your advice and get back to my old healthy ways. Luckily the warm weather is supposedly just around the corner as well. My body likes to hibernate in the winter and I think that had a part to play.

The green tea is meant to have a lot of antioxidents which are supposedly good for us.

Mind you, god knows what goes into a lot of the food nowadays reading the papers.

No burgers or corned beef for a start. I love seafood and you would think that's healthy, however, I was reading something today about all the chemicals that is in the water where they catch a lot of this stuff. It's hard to find what's not going to poison you. I will need to study up on some of this stuff and get healthy again.

cheers