10% on 10 winning $100 sessions is taking away $100 before you get to the checkout.

That $100 could have made all the difference between winning and losing.

Thanks Vic 

You pay 10% on any winnings.

It used to be 10% on withdrawal.

Now it's per session!

Congratulations Ralph!

You win 1st, 2nd and 3rd prize. 

Quote from: soggett on February 01, 2013, 06:29:27 AM

a way of play shoud change with the spins and bet different every time ( ie today after number 1 you bet this, later after number 1 you bet that)

You are right soggett and that's why trying to explain things can get complicated because there are a lot of different variables when you are dealing with random.

Experience also counts for a lot.

What's funny is harry was saying some of his players are overpaid and then he goes and does something like that!

Mind you, it's not his money! 

I couldn't find any rumours related to spurs dino!

They must be keeping the cards pretty close to their chest.

I have always had a bit of a soft spot for spurs. I remember watching them in a few cup finals as a kid when ossie played for them.

Things always hot up on the final day!

Paris St Germain signing Becham!

That one is obviously a commercial deal more than anything else!

Quote from: Ralph on January 31, 2013, 12:41:23 PM

The highest bet was 23300 units

Well fair play to you Ralph!

You can't win it if you don't put it down.

I have learned a lot from reading your posts.

cheers 

The very nature of roulette would suggest nobody really needs to tamper with the variance.

The average 25/37 numbers ensures a dozen sleeps for 37 spins anyhow most of the time. So actually seeing dozen 2 sleep for 25 spins like I did last night should not really surprise me. It's just that they are neatly packaged in that middle section of the layout which catches my attention.

OK, I have looked back at what I have written in this thread and I think it's pretty clear.

I can't really explain it much better than what I already have. I have added the chart and a detailed explanation step by step for 20 spins.

The basic premise is to wait until there is a sleeper street and you add the 12 street to leave 2 missing streets. I think that part is clear if you go through the example a few times.

Then you use the chart to work out the bets which I have also explained using the 20 spins.

If someone is genuinely interested and wants to attempt some spins, I will answer back and correct anything you get wrong. You can PM them to me because I am locking this thread.



cheers.

Coming back to system9 has taught me a few things.

The coverage is between 7-8 streets = 21-24 numbers.

System 18 covers an average of about 14 numbers.

So I compared the average win per session between the games I have played the last few days using system9 and the sessions I played with system18 in my 'new year challenge' thread.

system9 averages mid twenties.

system18 averages mid forties.

You would think covering more numbers with system9 would be the safer bet!

However it strikes me that the extra coverage just results in more lost chips and that's why the average win per session is only half.

This is good to know and it serves as a solitary lesson for anyone thinking more numbers may be better when designing a strategy.

Quote from: soggett on January 29, 2013, 04:29:31 PM

I am interested in this too, just don't get it all
that's why I hope you code it

When I get an afternoon this week, I will write up a few pages and go through it step by step. 

[attachimg=1]

session 1. +16.
session 2. +39.
session 3. +28.
session 4. +13.
session 5. +22.
session 6. +21.
session 7. +2. (A toughie!)
session 8. +40.

Total = +181 units.

I was just playing at BV on the NZ wheel.

It went 25 spins without the 2nd dozen before I logged out.

Who knows how many it would have ended up going to! 

Quote from: Ralph on January 29, 2013, 01:41:53 PM
I am not sure I understand  what you mean.

It is just that I notice that there are always a few back to back sessions with almost the same time frame and same win. It just seems too robotic for the random nature of roulette. It is more than likely just my brain recognizing the similarity. But I see it quite often on logs people put up and with my own results.

cheers