Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Bally6354

#631
Hello Sam

I ordered the book last night and will put up some of his progression twists once it arrives.

His book was recommended to me by several people. My goal for 2013 is to learn as much about MM as I can.

p.s. The fibonacci sequence is 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89.

I think your example is using the D'alembert.
#632
Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum / Re: @ Bayes and Esoito
January 03, 2013, 12:10:08 AM
esoito

I just hope a few of you get some enjoyment from reading the book and that it maybe helps some of you with your betting. Roulette is my main focus and most of my energy goes in that direction at the moment. I don't really have time for anything else.

cheers  :thumbsup:
#633
Thanks esoito  :thumbsup:

I will send away for a copy. (used of course)
#634
It is basically the following......


Go up one step after each loss and down one step after a win and start over after back-to-back wins or 2-out-of-3 wins.

He wrote a book in 1995 titled 'Beat the casino'. This is one of the many ideas he shared.

cheers

p.s. It would be nice if somebody had a copy of that book.  ;)

#635
Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum / Re: @ Bayes and Esoito
January 02, 2013, 12:30:31 PM
Quote from: Bally6354 on December 21, 2012, 10:55:51 AM

I have a book on an old hard drive which was going to be published some time ago about horseracing and how to read the markets. It was actually banned from publication. The major bookmakers in the UK took out an injunction because they did not want this information made available to the general public. It did go into great detail about the relationships between different factions in racing and spelled things out pretty clear. That PC crashed but I will take the hard drive out and see if I can retrieve the data. I will put that up here if the hard drive was not damaged and the file lost.


The guy was open this morning and did manage to save some of my old stuff!  :cheer:

Here it is.....

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c6xyftzkim1j2r1/Isiris%20Unveiled.pdf
#636
Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum / Re: A QUICK OVERVIEW
January 01, 2013, 12:29:35 AM
I will get it next week and write it up on here.

What I liked about it was that there was nearly always a selection which was a clear pick over the rest of the traps. This in an individual race would normally mean a skinny price however the prices for the trap challenge normally start around the 7/2 mark. I have had a few nice 5/1 and 11/2 winners with it!
#637
Quote from: esoito on December 31, 2012, 11:40:32 PM
Just a thought:  I wonder if we're all working from a shared meaning of the word "consistent".

The whole poll hangs on that specific word, doesn't it?



That's true. So consistent has to mean you can overcome the 2.70% or 5.40% disadvantage. Otherwise you are not really winning!

[Edit:  I've added this to the first post so voters are sharing the same meaning of the word. ]
#638
Horse & Greyhound Racing Forum / Re: A QUICK OVERVIEW
December 31, 2012, 11:41:52 PM
A friend of mine that lives down in London is a big dogs fan! He has regularly visited the London tracks for the last 40 years and is no mug!

He has a method which seems to win more often than not. We have something here in the U.K called 'The trap challenge'.

3 pts for a win.
2 pts for second place.
1 pt for third place.

The dog with the most points wins the challenge. You do sometimes get dead heats.

He has told me his selection criteria oodles of times and I keep forgetting it!  :))

I am going down to see him next week and I will write it down this time.

cheers
#639
Bravo Ralph!  :applause:

#640
General Discussion / Re: Happy New Year 2013!!
December 31, 2012, 03:30:20 PM
Happy new year to everyone!

May 2013 bring you all you wish for!  :)
#641
Great work Ralph!

Imagine a run like that in a casino with $5 chips!

Nearly 15k  :o

Norman Leigh and his team could have done just as well playing this way!
#642
I voted yes and one of my reasons for doing so was because of the Pelayos family who attacked the wheels looking for bias.

I have to admit that I originally thought that the whole story could have just been a load of casino propaganda (I can be very cynical) However it appears that Pelayos took several casinos to court because they banned him from playing. So I am pretty sure the whole story is legit. I think they are still probably wheels out there today that could be taken advantage of if someone knew what they were looking for.

Of course it is possible that there are other methods out there as well which nobody has ever mentioned on the internet.

I got a surprise on a recent trip abroad to see the single 0 wheel have a 00 right next door to it on some of the wheels.

cheers
#643
A new member called Squeezebox wrote a very insightful post on the following thread.

http://betselection.cc/newcomers-lounge/read-this-the-best-advice-you'll-ever-get-!!/msg5699/#new

Here is a quote...

''I know that there are bucket-loads of mathematicians out there who state categorically that mathematically-based systems cannot defeat the wheel - but, again, I am not one of them.  Maybe my view is based on the romantic notion that "there is more under the sky that has not been discovered ... yada yada etc." but I am convinced that it can be done.  Further, I believe that it HAS been done'' - sqzbox

So I am running this poll to see what the general concensus is like.

What interested me recently was a number of posters on several forums claiming that they had accounts closed from some of the Live Dealer internet casinos. (They were still allowed to play the RNG version!)

All views are welcome as long as they remain on topic.

cheers  :thumbsup:

NB: The word Consistent for this poll means: You can overcome the 2.70% or 5.40% disadvantage.
#644
Quote from: Ralph on December 30, 2012, 01:32:40 PM

I can live with that, as long it is "Wanted" and not "Not Wanted"!

:))  Nice one!
#645
Dear Ralph, I think it's only fair to warn you that I just saw the following on betvoyager!!


[attachimg=1]