Can I ask you a question as not to insult you......


Why are most of your picks such high odds? in the last month you have only posted 2 plays with odds of less then -125(4/5), 1 play at -175(4/7), and all the rest at -200 or better,  and that includes the pick you posted today

could you explain this logic to me if you could. I am trying to figure out what strike rate you would need to maintain to be in profits at the end of the month or year

not what I expected last night. Rogers getting hurt threw a wrench in everything. Oh well, that's the way the cookie crumbles

Bears vs Packers


GB -3.5  2q         ......i like this one the most
GB-7      1st half
Under 51 game

Sam.....


The RFH cost you only 11 units!!!!  that's not bad at all



Now can you please stop FUTZING around and test this thing properly [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

Quote from: NoBody on November 04, 2013, 10:17:28 AM

   
• i gave them my play by play (down 3 units, down 2 units, up 2 units, etc)

Does anyone have this and if they do can you post it up please?

trying to wrap my head around this one, for some reason its not clicking at the moment [smiley]aes/confused.png[/smiley]

Is there a simple excel tracker for this.....it would really help me learn step by step


Sam ....I could use some of your redneck logic to help me get by one this one 

 

Good luck.....


I think Marshall 2q -3 is the best bet on the board for tonight......well at least the way the numbers fall

Razor,


If you care to answer.....


if you walked up to a brand new table (no prev number history) and you observed the first spin being 25.....would this string produce 5 losses in a row after that appearance?

25 ....first spin observed
14
36
17
17
10


Or am I not close?

Just back tested this through all World Series games since 2000 and it doesn't look to good

69 total games, only 33 of the games did not have a run scored in the first. that's 47.8% not a good enough strike rate for me to put my money on,,,

But since 2009 there has been 22 games and there has not been a score in the first 14 of those games, that's 63.6%

It also look that if in the year before there was runs scored in the first more then 50% then it repeats again the following year. Also you don't really see more then 2 years in a row where there are more runs scored vs runs not scored

Sounds interesting ......im going to look into some stats on this

Nope, just go down there on my casino trips. I am from the North East

Keep up the good work bud [smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]

6)The bet does not have 2 parts... It has 3.
I said so many times to read the clues and read them correct..I alaso said to read the shikamaru s clues and he clearly started that the bet has 3 parts.
7)Only with RX is easier to SPOT the covements ...the hard pasrt is to spot the correct ones because on every spin a lot of movements are happening.
RX not only will help you find those movements but it willa also make your life easier in testing the bet.
Knowing what is the last doz or col or Ecs can t help you because only 1 spin is NOT a movement.
Only the flashing thing that RX has is helping in spoting the movements.




When you say that 1 spin is not a movement could you clarify that further? Is it 3 spins as in a full cycle for either dozen or column? Or is it more?

3 parts? hmmmm now this gets me thinking....does this mean it is more of a parachute bet where the 3rd part is where all 4 bets are up at the same time to cover more of the possible runs/changes?

Thanks again for any help you provide and may your good fortune keep up with you

600 unit bankroll per trip

that's a good session bankroll....how often if ever do you lose a 600 unit bankroll