An interesting read Albalaha, thank you.

  that is classic!

I can hear Spike running! We all know he's dieing to hear how much John has won ....

Welcome back. I enjoy reading your stuff. [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

Hi Turner,

yes its 86 or so here in Essex. Lovely isn't it? Will be in soon though to watch the Wimbledon final. That's gonna be hot on that Centre Court!!!
Lovely looking garden btw!!

Was surprised by how easy it was for Bartoli. I didn't see that coming.

Mint, Murray, mint!!! 

My goal...well one of them!


[attachimg=1]

Thank you Vic. I'd like to express the same wishes to all Fathers out there in Forum land.

Quote from: Bayes on June 16, 2013, 08:57:01 AM

It always seems to come down to a lack of trust in RNG's (because it's perceived that manipulating outcomes is easier), rather than any hard evidence that outcomes are inherently different.

I would just like to add my two penneth worth (I know this wasn't about Roulette specifically but..).
I think the above statement by Bayes hits the nail on the head. Just because they can (and NO doubt have) been manipulated in the past people now have a mental thing in their head for RNG. When somewhere like BV has their hash security what else do you need to know?
I have seen 24 numbers in a row with no repeater and I have seen 7 zeros in a row, all on live wheels, so nothing RNG does surprises me.
This is the point, anything can happen real wheel or not.

Thank you for you frank and honest post. It is appreciated. I'm sure you will have many people looking to see what you you have to say.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on June 04, 2013, 02:02:42 PM
Normy

So your guess is the 10 shoes will lose 85 units.  Very good! 

Would anyone else hazard a guess?


Sam

-1 unit

Well fair play to Izak for putting his money where his mouth is. Nice one Chris!

Chess! Another game we could play on the felt?...sort of.

Hi Drazen

Thank you very much for the link. Ill have  a long hard think about what you guys are doing ( or at least what I suspect your doing).