For the first cycle of 37 spins the SD is 2.23

For the first 2 cycles (74 spins) the SD is 3.32

For the first 3 cycles (111 spins) the SD is 4.36

For the first 4 cycles (148 spins) the SD is 4.69

For the first 5 cycles (185 spins) the SD is 5.10

For the first 6 cycles (222 spins) the SD is 5.29

The net profit of 61.5 is being achieved on the 229th spin and at that time the SD was 4.94

The maximum drawdown was on 202nd spin with -530.5 and 5.50 SD

87 wins 37.99% / 142 losses 62.01% at 229th spin which made the breakthrough.

Take a look in the following example:

BETTING ALWAYS ON RED / FRENCH ROULETTE WITH "LE PARTAGE" RULE

S=Spin R=Result T=Total   
S           R           T

1          -1          -1
2          -1          -2
3x        +1         -1
4          -1          -2
5x        +1         -1
6          -1          -2
7x        +1         -1
8          -1          -2
9          -1          -3
10x       +1         -2
11         -1          -3
12x       +1         -2
13         -1          -3
14/ZERO -0.5      -3.5
15          -1        -4.5
16x        +1       -3.5
17         -1        -4.5
18         -1        -5.5
19         -1        -6.5
20         -1        -7.5
21x       +1       -6.5
22         -1        -7.5
23x       +1       -6.5
24         -1        -7.5
25         -1        -8.5
26         -1        -9.5
27         -1        -10.5 
28         -1        -11.5
29x       +1       -10.5
30         -1        -11.5
31x       +1       -10.5
32x       +1       -9.5
33         -1        -10.5
34         -1        -11.5
35x       +1       -10.5
36x       +1       -9.5
37x       +1       -8.5
38x       +2       -6.5  BET RAISES TO 2 UNITS
39         -2        -8.5
40         -2        -10.5
41         -2        -12.5
42x       +2       -10.5
43         -2        -12.5
44         -2        -14.5
45x       +2       -12.5
46x       +2       -10.5
47         -2        -12.5
48         -2        -14.5
49         -2        -16.5
50         -2        -18.5
51         -2        -20.5
52x       +2       -18.5
53         -2        -20.5
54         -2        -22.5   
55x       +2       -20.5
56         -2        -22.5
57         -2        -24.5
58x       +2       -22.5
59         -2        -24.5
60         -2        -26.5
61         -2        -28.5
62x       +2       -26.5
63         -2        -28.5
64         -2        -30.5
65x       +2       -28.5
66         -2        -30.5
67         -2        -32.5   
68x       +2       -30.5
69x       +2       -28.5
70         -2        -30.5
71x       +2       -28.5
72         -2        -30.5
73         -2        -32.5
74         -2        -34.5
75x       +4       -30.5   BET RAISES TO 4 UNITS
76         -4        -34.5
77x       +4       -30.5
78         -4        -34.5
79         -4        -38.5
80x       +4       -34.5
81         -4        -38.5
82         -4        -42.5
83         -4        -46.5
84         -4        -50.5
85         -4        -52.5
86         -4        -56.5
87         -4        -60.5
88         -4        -64.5
89         -4        -68.5   
90x       +4       -64.5
91         -4        -68.5
92x       +4       -64.5
93         -4        -68.5
94         -4        -72.5
95x      +4        -68.5
96        -4         -72.5
97x      +4        -68.5
98        -4         -72.5
99        -4         -76.5
100      -4         -80.5
101x    +4        -76.5
102x    +4        -72.5
103      -4         -76.5
104x    +4        -72.5
105/ZERO -2     -74.5
106       -4        -78.5
107       -4        -82.5
108       -4        -86.5
109       -4        -90.5
110       -4        -94.5
111       -4        -98.5
112       -8        -106.5  BET RAISES TO 8 UNITS
113       -8        -114.5
114x     +8       -106.5
115       -8        -114.5
116       -8        -122.5   
117x     +8       -114.5
118       -8        -122.5
119x     +8       -114.5
120       -8        -122.5
121       -8        -130.5
122x     +8       -122.5
123       -8        -130.5
124       -8        -138.5
125       -8        -146.5
126       -8        -154.5
127       -8        -162.5
128x     +8       -154.5
129x     +8       -146.5
130x     +8       -138.5
131x     +8       -130.5
132       -8        -138.5
133       -8        -146.5
134x     +8       -138.5
135       -8        -146.5
136       -8        -154.5
137       -8        -162.5
138x     +8       -154.5
139       -8        -162.5
140x     +8       -154.5
141       -8        -162.5
142       -8        -170.5
143x     +8       -162.5
144       -8        -170.5
145x     +8       -162.5
146x     +8       -154.5
147x     +8       -146.5
148       -8        -154.5
149x     +16     -138.5  BET RAISES TO 16 UNITS
150x     +16      -122.5
151       -16       -138.5
152       -16       -154.5
153/ZERO -8     -162.5
154x     +16      -146.5
155x     +16      -130.5
156       -16       -146.5
157       -16       -162.5
158x     +16      -146.5
159       -16       -162.5
160       -16       -178.5
161       -16       -194.5
162       -16       -210.5
163x     +16      -194.5
164x     +16      -178.5
165       -16       -194.5
166       -16       -210.5
167       -16       -226.5
168x     +16      -210.5
169       -16      -226.5
170       -16       -242.5   
171x     +16      -226.5
172x     +16      -210.5
173       -16       -226.5
174x     +16      -210.5
175x     +16      -194.5
176       -16       -210.5
177       -16       -226.5
178       -16       -242.5
179       -16       -258.5
180x     +16      -242.5
181       -16       -258.5
182       -16       -274.5
183       -16       -290.5
184x     +16      -274.5
185       -16       -290.5
186/ZERO -16    -306.5     BET RAISES TO 32 UNITS
187x     +32      -274.5
188       -32       -306.5
189       -32       -338.5
190/ZERO -16    -354.5
191       -32       -386.5
192x     +32      -354.5
193x     +32      -322.5
194       -32       -354.5
195       -32       -386.5
196x     +32      -354.5
197       -32       -386.5
198       -32       -418.5
199/ZERO -16    -434.5
200          -32    -466.5
201     10      -32   -498.5
202     6        -32   -530.5 
203     14      +32   -498.5       
204     21      +32   -466.5         
205     30      +32   -434.5         
206     11      -32    -466.5         
207     12      +32   -434.5         
208     10      -32    -466.5       
209     22      -32    -498.5       
210     34      +32   -466.5       
211     10      -32    -498.5       
212     16      +32   -466.5       
213     0       -16     -482.5     
214     14      +32   -450.5     
215     8        -32    -482.5     
216     34      +32   -450.5     
217     18      +32   -418.5     
218     19      +32   -386.5     
219     25      +32   -354.5     
220     35      -32    -386.5     
221     34      +32   -354.5     
222     29      -32    -386.5     
223     16      +64   -322.5     BET RAISES TO 64 UNITS
224     21      +64   -258.5     
225     12      +64   -194.5     
226     30      +64   -130.5     
227     9        +64    -66.5     
228     34      +64    -2.5     
229     32      +64    +61.5   BET RESETS TO 1 UNIT     
230     15      -1       +60.5   
231     0       -0.5     +60     
232     17     -1        +59     
233     2       -1        +58     
234     3      +1        +59       
235     0      -0.5      +58.5   
236     1      +1        +59.5   
237     36    +1        +60.5   
238     22    -1         +59.5     
239     34    +1        +60.5     
240     11    -1         +59.5     
241     20    -1         +58.5     
242     1     +1         +59.5     
243     28    -1         +58.5     
244     11    -1         +57.5     
245     21    +1        +58.5     
246     29    -1         +57.5     
247     15    -1         +56.5     
248     15    -1         +55.5     
249     34    +1        +56.5     
250     10    -1         +55.5     
251     16    +1        +56.5     
252     4      -1         +55.5     
253     35    -1         +54.5     
254     17    -1         +53.5     
255     4      -1         +52.5     
256     19    +1        +53.5     
257     25    +1        +54.5     
258     11    -1         +53.5     
259     0     -0.5       +53       
260     5     +2         +55    BET RAISES TO 2 UNITS
261     22    -2         +53       
262     31    -2         +51       
263     0     -1          +50   
264     2     -2          +48     
265     10   -2          +46     
266     6     -2          +44   
267     28   -2          +42   
268     27   +2         +44   
269     4     -2          +42   
270     1     +2         +44   
271     3     +2         +46   
272     11   -2          +44   
273     11   -2          +42   
274     9    +2          +44     
275     5    +2          +46   
276     1    +2          +48   
277     19  +2          +50     
278     11   -2          +48     
279     28   -2          +46   
280     10   -2          +44     
281     15   -2          +42     
282     27  +2          +44   
283     23  +2          +46   
284     13  -2           +44   
285     7   +2           +46     
286     17  -2           +44   
287     35  -2           +42     
288     27  +2          +44     
289     14  +2          +46     
290     21  +2          +48     
291     14  +2          +50     
292     34  +2          +52     
293     11  -2           +50     
294     10  -2           +48     
295     36  +2          +50     
296     24  -2           +48   
297     36  +4          +52      BET RAISES TO 4 UNITS
298     34  +4          +56     
299     7    +4          +60     
300     5    +4          +64           
301     6    -1           +63      BET RESETS TO 1 UNIT
302     16  +1          +64     
303     34  +1          +65     
304     34  +1          +66     
305     33  -1           +65     
306     26  -1           +64     
307     1   +1           +65       
308     5   +1           +66     
309     0  -0.5          +65.5       
310     33  -1           +64.5       
311     0   -0.5         +64   
312     9   +1           +65     
313     0   -0.5         +64.5     
314     21  +1          +65.5     
315     23  +1          +66.5     
316     13  -1           +65.5     
317     3   +1           +66.5   
318     20  -1           +65.5     
319     34  +1          +66.5       
320     28  -1           +65.5       
321     28  -1           +64.5     
322     14  +1          +65.5     
323     20  -1           +64.5     
324     30  +1          +65.5     
325     25  +1          +66.5     
326     36  +1          +67.5   
327     1   +1           +68.5     
328     31  -1           +67.5     
329     35  -1           +66.5   
330     36 +1           +67.5     
331     5   +1           +68.5     
332     29  -1           +67.5     
333     28  -1           +66.5   

Quote from: Sputnik on February 26, 2016, 03:06:18 PM
i more into MM where you break even or lose half your bankroll when you hit the worst and extreme - like 3.0 4.0 5.0 SD without any triggers and play every decision ...

I can win 5.5 SD with less than 600 units BR and max bet 64 units, no triggers, betting every spin!

Like ''Bayes'' said before:

1) Bet the hottest line
2) Bet the coldest line
3) Bet the most balanced line

6+6+6 = 18
3 lines of 6 numbers are equal to 1 EC

''beat-the-wheel'',

By now you must have understood how my method works, so do it yourself, I'm not your secretary.

Besides I find silly these challenges, do I've to prove you something?
I think I don't.

By the way, like ''the law'' said, if the source of the results cannot be verified, like Wiesbaden casino for example, anyone could put up anything without being real.

And one last thing, I said that I could provide examples of sequences which have NUMBERS, not just W/L registry.
I didn't select any sequence because you could say I picked an easy one, the first 2 which I have posted are not mine, I've just played them.

QuoteYou cannot be serious.

A 10,000 unit bank.

When a prospective investor or entrepreneur is ready to invest 100,000 in some risky venture has more sense to you?

QuoteI once had a Mentor who used progressions. He sometimes  played with over 10,000 units at $5 or the higher equivalent in GBP at the Ritz in London, and with $10 units- $100 units  in LV.

Numbers alone provide no advantage, the key is in the quality, not the quantity.

QuoteI notice BA you post a lot on this Forum now after much on Roulette30 which has no effective moderation and trolls/ dinosaurs like Real/ Xander still lurk and roam awaiting yet another opportunity to expose their closed and bigoted views usually suggesting AP solves all problems in casino play.

This is true but I wish it was the only negative there...

QuoteYou have ignored some expert advice given to you on that Forum and you regurgitate the same ideas here. Why?

Expert advice? Would you mind be more specific?

QuoteDo you seriously expect some gullible novice to access this huge amount of money to try your theory or take your word?

No

QuoteAn experienced player would run a marathon to escape your terms and risk exposure.

How come?

QuoteI will give an extreme example that shows what can be done when the bet played has a reason for existence , and the player understands and applies it, and is smart and has put in the thousands of hours needed to succeed.  The edge that the winning bet  provides is measured and known within a small variance range, and the bet characteristics are known in terms of risk exposure, behaviour in extremely adverse conditions, and the worst draw downs experienced with the ability to recover known and proven by empirical rigorous testing over 30 sessions at least.

You are trying to describe what you are doing, this tells me that you consider good only what you are doing.

QuoteNo final detail will ever be published but a few writers, including myself have tried to share experience and  provide genuine pathways - not false trails.

This is more subjective rather than objective.

QuoteIn my opinion a winning bet needs to be able to be flat staked and can exist and be grown, played from a seed original bank of 100 units if it is valid within the type of limited variance I have seen demonstrated, and which is needed in order to be practical. It can win most sessions, but from the worst it can escape with limited damage, on a sensible but conservative stop loss. This is because the uptrend is demonstrated over 90%  of live play sufficient to take relatively easy profit if the goals are modest and practical and readily achievable. I am talking about  +10 units approx on a 100 RB.  The only change from session to session will be the increase of unit value as profit permits.

Again you are promoting what you are doing, believe me, I've heard many times this 10% goal per session from individuals who support much different methods...

I even heard that no matter the way you approach the game with a bankroll of 10,000$ and aiming to win 10% per session will success regardless of the method, that's absurd!

Aiming for 10% return per session compromises the balance between risk and reward, in other words if you lose one session you will need ten winning sessions in a row before you lose a second session.

Only someone who gambles for entertainment can consider seriously such approach, to be more or less on the same money after a month but having free beverages and some comps in the form of discounts.
This is good only for recreational players like you, you who plays slots and believe that slots can be beaten without luck and illegal equipment.

Not for the professional players who can manage their impulsions, who have made discipline and patience their second nature.

QuoteI have had some personal dealings with BA and note he demanded I describe my private bet to him because he insisted. He also accused me of 'stealing' some other individual's method, yet claiming ownership.

I didn't demand, I've requested and you've answered me: ''Everything is there (your studio) if you can read between the lines...really.''
But I insisted for a clear description because you've wrote a lot in that studio and don't know where to begin!
Eventually you replied me to ask you again after 3 months and I did on last September...
On late June of 2015 I was speaking on the same time with a few members of this forum through Skype and emails, 2 of those members were albahala and XXVV.
User albahala told me that XXVV has childish methods, cherry picking numbers and  that he has  blog where he posted his method.
He actually direct me to his blog and saw the free version of his method, also said that the very same method had an advanced mode which was only available for paid subscribers.
XXVV was one of his paid subscribers and albahala claimed he copied his paid method.

So, instead of pretending the offended and accusing me, the messenger, you should express your arguments directly to albahala  if you think he is lying against you!

QuoteOh and by the way wrt your slander of the MIT BJ professionals - perhaps you might like to contact Semyon Dukach in Boston, or Ben Mezrich. Mr Dukach is available on LinkedIn and is a hugely successful Angel Investor in US startups in technology. I have his email address if you would like to contact him directly. He will put you straight.

XXVV, it seems you are a secret fan of my posts at roulette30, what I said there about MIT is just the truth.

There are many misconceptions which are misleading people, I believe there is a purpose in this and if you think for a moment who would benefit from those you would realize who are behind this big bubble!

Besides that post was not originally mine but re-posted from a blackjack forum.
XXVV, do you think you know better than the blackjack players who originally posted it?
Have you ever bother with blackjack at all?

To ask the suspect if he is guilty has never made sense!

So mr XXVV,  excuse me if I don't "buy" what you have to "sell"!

Quoteand below not mine, but quote from  with permission,
go there and, dare to debate with him if you have the...err, err...ballllllls...

It's a waste of time to bother with such comments.

I'm not going to repeat it so listen carefully;
The goal of EVERY session is to make a profit, I'm not playing for fixed amounts neither fixed duration/spins.

One session could last 40 minutes or 4 hours, could gain 1 unit or 110 units, I don't know these things before finishing sessions.
What I do know is that I'll never walk away as loser, always I'm going to end my session with more money than when I've started it.

Unless there is a casino rule which obliges you to quit when you lose, I decide to continue till I'm in profit and finish when I have enough of it.
I decide it, not the casino, nor luck!

Dear readers,

this is a thread which requires your full attention in order to fully comprehend the hidden opportunity.

Let's start with the basic about the Law Of the Third:

In every 37 spins cycle there are 24 numbers which have appeared once or more and 13 sleepers
(numbers which haven't appeared within the last 37 spins)
Those are average numbers and deviations exist, for example I've seen up to 30 different numbers to show up within the 37 last spins and the least were 18 different numbers.
Those extremes are from my experience during gambling sessions and not from simulations.
In order to find the average we should determine the extremes,or in other words the limits, in that case 18 and 30 are the limits.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 start by discarding the outer numbers from both sides:

First discarding 18 and 30
Second discard 19 and 29
Third discard 20 and 28
Fourth discard 21 and 27
Fifth discard 22 and 26
Sixth discard 23 and 25

And we conclude to 24 which is the average total of the appeared numbers within 37 last spins.
Another way to calculate the average is to add all the totals and then divide the total sum with the total of the averages,for example:

18 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 1 time
19 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 2 times
20 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 3 times
21 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 4 times
22 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 5 times
23 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 6 times
24 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 7 times
25 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 6 times
26 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 5 times
27 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 4 times
28 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 3 times
29 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 2 times
30 different numbers within the last 37 spins happened 1 times

[(1 x 18)+(2 x 19)+(3 x 20)+(4 x 21)+(5 x 22)+(6 x 23)+(7 x 24)+(6 x 25)+(5 x 26)+(4 x 27)+(3 x 28)+(2 x 29)+(1 x 30) / 49] =>

[(18+38+60+84+110+138+168+150+130+108+84+58+30) / 49]=>

1176 / 49 = 24

This means that if someone was betting one number for 37 spins, 24 times he/she would have won and 13 times he/she would have lost.
To calculate the total sum of lost bets is easy:
13 times multiplied by 37 (1 x 37) equals minus 481 units.

In order to find the total amount of won bets, we should again calculate the averages as we did above,let's see:
We start from the middle numbers within a 37 spin cycle and add 2 more numbers from both sides till we have a total of 24.
18th and 19th spins
17th and 20th spins
16th and 21st spins
15th and 22nd spins
14th and 23rd spins
13th and 24th spins
12th and 25th spins
11th and 26th spins
10th and 27th spins
9th and 28th spins
8th and 29th spins
7th and 30th spins
So we have 24 wins from different spins, now let's calculate the total amount of net profit.

29+28+27+26+25+24+23+22+21+20+19+18+17+16+15+14+13+12+11+10+9+8+7+6 = 420

But since we would lose 481 - 420 = -61 loss, therefore the definition negative expectation.

Do we agree so far?
Is everything clear?

Let's see how we could turn the negative expectation into positive without changing a thing in terms of probability, in fact with exactly the same results which have lead us to the negative balance above.

The average expectation is to get twice the wins for every loss, with my method you only need approximately 1 positive cycle for every negative cycle, which means that the proportion of 2 to 1 changed to 1 to 1.

Let me explain how this is possible, the only thing which I'm not going to reveal you here is the criteria which I'm using to select the betting number.
You could pick a random number, or your "lucky" number or anything else you like.

I start flat betting 1 number with 1 unit for 36 spins.
When the betting number appears, no matter in which spin, I re-bet the same number plus its neighbour regarding the wheel layout (right or left doesn't matter)

So now I'm flat betting 2 numbers with 1 unit each for the next 18 spins.
When one of the two betting numbers hits within eighteen spins, then I re-bet those two numbers and adding the other wheel neighbour, thus in total three numbers for the next 12 spins, always flat bet 1 unit each.

When one of the three betting numbers comes, I add one more neighbour,this time from the table layout.
So far we have 4 numbers to flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 9 spins.
Let's see if you keep on winning what happens:

5 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 7 spins
6 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 6 spins
7 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 5 spins
8 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 4 spins
9 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 4 spins
10 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 3 spins
11 numbers flat bet with 1 unit each for the next 3 spins

Eleven is the maximum numbers you could bet, this may happen if your first number was 17 for example, because 17 has 2 neighbours on the wheel's layout (like every number) and 8 neighbours regarding the table layout 13,14,15,16,18,19,20,21 (yes,the diagonals too).

What if someone is lucky enough and after adding all neighbours one by one continues to win?
In this case you start adding 1 unit each time you win to only 1 of your betting numbers, you should start from your first selection and continue with the same order.
The minimum total of betting numbers are 6, for example 34 has 2 neighbours at the wheel's layout (17,6) and 3 neighbours at the table (31,32,35)
All together with 34 are six numbers.

We have seen how it might proceed if you are lucky and win frequently, this is not so rare because sometimes the croupiers are hitting specific sectors/numbers frequently (more than their probability)
Personally I've reached two times the 6 numbers bet selection after not many trials, of course this is not always the case.
Let's see what happens when we eventually lose, when you lose during 2 numbers bet selection or more, then you just pick another number and start from scratch, which means flat bet 1 number for the next 36 spins.

There is only one exception, if you lose during 1 number bet selection, in that case you pick another number but this time the betting wouldn't be flat, each and every time our number fails to hit we would add some interest by adding 1 unit.
So the bet on our number would be like this:
1st spin 1 unit
2nd spin 2 units
3rd spin 3 units
4th spin 4 units and so on till your number eventually appears or till you have lost for 37 spins in a row.

If you lose for second consecutive time your 37 bet cycle,this means that somewhere ahead are 4 more winning cycles/rounds but you would only need 2 of them in order to overcome the 2 negative ones.
You change again the number and continue with the dynamic progression till your winning cycles/rounds equals your losing ones.

Let's calculate the losing and winning totals by betting with the dynamic progression instead of the flat bet.
Remember that the average expectation is to lose 13 times within 37 cycles/rounds, so the total loss will be:
[13 x (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18+19+20+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28+29+30+31+32+33+34+35+36+37)]=>
13 x 703 = -9139 units

Now let's calculate the total amount of profit:

[(7 x 35) - 21] + [(8 x 35) - 28] + [(9 x 35) - 36] +[(10 x 35) - 45] + [(11 x 35) - 55] + [(12 x 35) - 66] + [(13 x 35) - 78] + [(14 x 35) - 91] + [(15 x 35) - 105] + [(16 x 35) - 120] + [(17 x 35) - 136] +[(18 x 35) - 153] + [(19 x 35) - 171] + [(20 x 35) - 190] + [(21 x 35) - 210] + [(22 x 35) - 231] + [(23 x 35) - 253] + [(24 x 35) - 276] + [(25 x 35) - 300] + [(26 x 35) - 325] + [(27 x 35) - 351] + [(28 x 35) - 378] + [(29 x 35) - 406] + [(30 x 35) - 435] =>

(245 - 21) + (280 - 28) + (315 - 36) + (350 - 45) + (385 - 55) + (420 - 66) + (455 - 78) + (490 - 91) + (525 - 105) + (560 - 120) + (595 - 136) + (630 - 153) + (665 - 171) + (700 - 190) + (735 - 210) + (770 - 231) + (805 - 253) + (840 - 276) + (875 - 300) + (910 - 325) + (945 - 351) + (980 - 378) + (1015 - 406) + (1050 - 435) =>

224 + 252 + 279 + 305 + 330 + 354 + 377 + 399 + 420 + 440 + 459 + 477 + 494 + 510 + 525 + 539 + 552 + 564 + 575 + 585 + 594 + 602 + 609 + 615 = +11080

We deduct 9139 from 11080 and we find 1941 net profit, therefore the negative expectation has been turned into positive!
But wait, there are more good news!

Since always the first losing cycle/round costs us 36 units instead of 703, that's why you don't need the exact probability to happen (2 winning cycles for every 1 losing cycle), you need approximately equal winning/losing cycles.
I say approximately because you never know in which spin your number is going to appear, thus the net gain differs.
Let me put it this way,if after 2 losing cycles you have 2 winning ones, then you are in profit and re-start from 1 number flat bet with 1 unit for 36 spins.

But after 3 or more consecutive losing cycles you would need the same amount of winning cycles plus 1 more.
Even in such situation, you can be in the positive with worst results than what probability theory supports.
For example in order to overcome 3 losing rounds, I just need 4 instead of 6 which probability dictates as average.
Of course,the results could also be better than average!:-)

Just remember that in the first phase, while we flat bet, we try to find the possibility to win by frequent repeaters.
We build slowly and safely a net gain and we don't limit the possibility for more profits (sky is the limit!) but we limit the loss.

During any stage of the 1st phase (flat bet) the maximum amount we risk is 36 units or less, if you don't lose during the 1st (1x36) or 2nd stage (2x18) of the first phase, then you would be in the positive.
The longer you keep on winning with the flat bets, the more would be the profit, it's all about what happens first.

Under any circumstance you will know what to do next, I'd recommend a total bankroll of 2000 minimum, 6000 average and 10000 units maximum in order to overcome occasional distribution anomalies.

Angelo A.

As you might have understood the principle behind "Pandora's box" is averaging distances and then applying them in a diverse symmetrical manner from the most recent reference points.

I believe roulette is a microcosmos of the real world, a reflection of our life which is mostly diverse and paradoxically achieves balances through unbalances.

Roulette is like a mirror which everyone sees different things...sees him/herself!
By trying to learn the secrets of roulette, I gained a deeper understanding for myself...
By learning the value of a loss, I became a winner.

Let's continue with the calculations:

So now we have 6 inner triangles inside the diamond which we have filled their base line of four cells each.

The top triangle (green) has: 3,16,26,9 make the following calculations, divide 16 by 2 and add the sum to 3, so on the cell exactly below numbers 3 and 16 you write 11 (3+8).
Divide 26 by 2 and add 8, write 21 (8+13) at the cell beneath 16 and 26.
Add 13 to 9 and we have 22, write below 26,9.

3   16   26   9
   11  21   22

Resplit 21 and add the sum  to 11, thus 21.5 (10.5+11) write it on the cell beneath numbers 11 and 21.
Add 10.5 to 22 and write 32.5 to the cell below 21,22.

3     16     26     9
   11    21     22
     21.5  32.5
         
Finally add the two last sums, 21.5 + 32.5 = 54

3     16     26     9
   11    21     22
     21.5  32.5
          54
54 is the total of the four baseline numbers, if one or more numbers divides completely the total then that is what we are looking for.
There are two numbers which fit this case, number 3 divides 54 to a whole number 18.
The next is 9 which divides 54 to 6.

Let's see the triangle which is placed at 4th line from bottom.
Its baseline numbers are:
28     11      21      34

Same as before divide 11 by 2, add 5.5 to 28, write 33.5 (5.5+28) to the cell below.
Split 21 and add the sum to 5.5 write 16 (10.5+5.5) below.
Add 10.5 to 34, write 44.5 below.

28     11      21      34
   33.5    16     44.5
       41.5   52.5
             94
In this case there is no number which can equally divide the total of 94, move on.

Next triangle left side, 8th line from the top, contains the numbers:

17     8     13     14
   21   10.5   20.5
     26.25  25.75
            52
In this case there is only one,this is 13 which divides 52 to 4.

Next triangle on the right side, 8th line from bottom:
23      24      29       20
     35    26.5    34.5
       48.25   47.75
               96
In this case there is only one, this is 24 which divides 96 to 4.

Next triangle is on the left, 8th line from bottom:
6     5     10     1
  8.5   7.5     6
    12.25  9.75
           22
In this case is 1 which divides 22 in 22.

Next triangle is on the right, 8th line from top:
4     5      11      2
  6.5    8      7.5
    10.5  11.5
          22
Here there are two numbers,first is 11 which divides 22 in 2 and 2 which divides 22 in 11.

From all triangles we gathered: 2, 4, 6, 11, 18 and 22, a total of 6 numbers but these are not the actual numbers to bet, these are the distance from the last reference set.
The last reference set includes the numbers 14 Ascendant, 35 Descendant, 27 Median and 18 Twin.
The tricky part is to assign on each reference number only 1 of the 6 sums we have calculated from the triangles.
The problem is that you could easily confuse which goes where!
The more simple way to proceed now is to assign all 6 distances to each and every reference number, therefore 4 multiplied by 6 makes 24 numbers to bet.

From ascendant number 14 count 2 pockets cw or ccw (depends on the direction the machine or croupier shoots the ball) and bet this number.
For example if croupier was to spin the ball towards cw direction, you should bet 9, in ccw direction bet number 1.
Count 4 pockets away from 14 and you find number 18 for cw direction or 16 for ccw.
Count 6 pockets away from 14 and you find number 7 for cw direction or 5 for ccw.
Count 11 pockets away from 14 and you find number 26 for cw direction or 11 for ccw.
Count 18 pockets away from 14 and you find number 2 for cw direction or 25 for ccw.
Count 22 pockets away from 14 and you find number 6 for cw direction or 19 for ccw.

Count 2 pockets away from 35 and you find number 26 for cw direction or 28 for ccw.
Count 4 pockets away from 35 and you find number 32 for cw direction or 29 for ccw.
Count 6 pockets away from 35 and you find number 19 for cw direction or 22 for ccw.
Count 11 pockets away from 35 and you find number 25 for cw direction or 1 for ccw.
Count 18 pockets away from 35 and you find number 30 for cw direction or 8 for ccw.
Count 22 pockets away from 35 and you find number 5 for cw direction or 13 for ccw.

Count 2 pockets away from 27 and you find number 36 for cw direction or 34 for ccw.
Count 4 pockets away from 27 and you find number 30 for cw direction or 25 for ccw.
Count 6 pockets away from 27 and you find number 23 for cw direction or 21 for ccw.
Count 11 pockets away from 27 and you find number 33 for cw direction or 0 for ccw.
Count 18 pockets away from 27 and you find number 18 for cw direction or 29 for ccw.
Count 22 pockets away from 27 and you find number 12 for cw direction or 31 for ccw.

Count 2 pockets away from 18 and you find number 7 for cw direction or 9 for ccw.
Count 4 pockets away from 18 and you find number 12 for cw direction or 14 for ccw.
Count 6 pockets away from 18 and you find number 3 for cw direction or 1 for ccw.
Count 11 pockets away from 18 and you find number 19 for cw direction or 10 for ccw.
Count 18 pockets away from 18 and you find number 6 for cw direction or 27 for ccw.
Count 22 pockets away from 18 and you find number 11 for cw direction or 25 for ccw.

To be continued...

The next number is 14 which is at 25th position, 11 pockets ccw and 26 cw from the previous number 26.
The new pair is and 14, their median is number 13 at 12th position (13 pockets from 26 and 14).
The twin of 13 is number 29 at 30th position (6 pockets from 26 and 5 from 14).

Let's calculate the distances: from number 26 to 14 the distance is 26 pockets cw and 11 ccw.
Go to 4th line from the top of the diamond, third cell from the left and write down 26.
4th line from the bottom, third cell from the right, write 11.
The median, number 13 has 13 pockets distance from one side and 24 from the other.
Go to 8th line from the top of the diamond diagram, third cell from the left and write 13.Put 24 on the 8th line from the bottom, on the third cell from the right.

Twin number 29 has 6 pockets distance from number 26 and 5 from number 14.
Go to 8th line from the bottom, third cell from the left and write 6.
Put 5 at the 8th line from the top, third cell from the right.

The final number, before we begin the calculations, is 35 which stands at 34th position and has 9 pockets cw distance and 28 ccw from number 14.
Their median is 27 at 11th position which splits in half the 28 pockets difference, thus 14 pockets from 35 and 14.
The twin of 27 is 18 (18 pockets away always), 18 is standing at the 29th pocket of the wheel and has 4 pockets distance from number 14 and 5 from 35.
Go to 4th line from the top of the diamond diagram, fourth cell from the left and write 9.
Put 28 on the 4th line from the bottom, on the fourth cell from the right.At 8th line from the top, fourth cell from the left write 14.
Put 23 at the 8th line from the bottom, fourth cell from the right.

Go to 8th line from the bottom, fourth cell from the left and write 4.
Put 5 at the 8th line from the top, fourth cell from the right.

Now we have completed the counting and we may proceed with the calculations.
Let's begin with the top triangle (green) inside the diamond.

To be continued...

Let's continue where we left of, the next number was 26.

26 is at position 36, 16 pockets cw from the previous number 24.
So new pair is 24 and 26, their median is number 22 at 28th position.
The twin of 22 is number 6 at 10th position.

Let's calculate the distances: from 24 to 26 16 cw and 21 ccw.
Go to 4th line from the top of the diamond,second cell from the left,write down 16.
4th line from the bottom, second cell from the right,write 21.

The median, number 22 has 8 pockets distance from one side and 29 from the other.
Go to 8th line from the top of the diamond diagram,second cell from the left and write 8.
Put 29 on the 8th line from the bottom, on the second cell from the right.
Twin number 6 has 10 pockets distance from number 24 and 11 from number 26.
Go to 8th line from the bottom,second cell from the left and write 10.
Put 11 at the 8th line from the top,second cell from the right.

Continue in this fashion with the next two numbers (14,35)
When you have completed the first line of 4 cells on each and every inner triangle of the diamond, then we could proceed to the calculations.

To be continued...

The first thing you have to do is grab a paper and design a diagram as the one I've attached but without the numbers.

I'm using Pascal's triangles in order to calculate distances from one point (number) to the next.
For a better understanding I'm going to share with you a few examples.
You may always ask your questions if something is not clear.

Let's say we have the following results:

1, 24, 26, 14, 35

Number 1 is at position 23, the next number is 24 which is at position 20.
The positions are in CW direction and start counting from twelve o'clock number 0.
The distance between 1 and 24 is 3 pockets or 34 from the long way.

Each pair of numbers has a median number, in this case median is number 19 at position 3.
The median has a direct opposite number which we are going to call it "twin".
The twin of 19 is number 16 at position 21.
So, number 1 was the first number we wrote down and we are going to call it "Ascendant".
24 was the second number and I'm calling it "Descendant".

The number which is always in the middle of the distance is the "Median" and its direct opposite the "Twin".
Now write down the numbers on the diagram,replace the initial letters with the respective number.

Second step is to calculate distances, let's move to the second diagram, the "Diamond".
From the top, move down for lines where 4 cells are.
On the first from the left cell write the CW difference between our Ascendant and Descendant which is 3.
From the bottom, move up four lines where four cells are and write down 34 which is the distance from the other side of the wheel.

Now we have to write down the distance between the median and our pair of numbers which is 17 and 20 pockets.
Write down 17 on the 8th line (from top) of the diamond, on the first left cell and put 20 on the 8th line from the bottom, on the first cell from the right.

Now we have to calculate the distance between the twin number and our pair.
So number 16 is 1 pocket away from 24 and 2 pockets away from number 1.
At the 8th line from bottom,on the first cell from left write 1.
At the 8th line from the top, on the first cell from right write 2.

To be continued...

What I'm about to present you crosses the boundaries of conventional thinking.
That's why requires a willingness to learn and achieve what have never been done before.

So if you feel that you already know enough and nothing new could fit in your brain together with what you already know, you may leave now, it would be better for all of us.

The "Pandora's Box" is an original and unique way to provide you an insight of the roulette number procedure.
What it seems random could be just a deception...
Random seems only when there is a gap of missing knowledge, this is where "Pandora's Box" comes, to fill your gap and make you see roulette from a new astounding angle!

My next post will provide you an analytic description and instructions.
Warning, this is not for beginners and "narrow minds".

Quote from: TheLaw on February 25, 2016, 12:34:49 AM
It's strange........I've never really seen him actively try to suppress anyone's method, and he doesn't actively try to sell his stuff (excluding adverts on the forum).

But I do find it odd that a man who claims to have a winning method (as he does) also sells cheating devices for Roulette.

What he does and what he claims I don't care.
Personally I don't know his policy about methods posted in his forum because I've not bothered with the particular forum.
But if you say that he usually doesn't bother but he did with my method when you posted it there probably means something...