Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - BrenoGarcia

#16
Sports Betting Forum / Re: UK League bets
August 15, 2013, 11:37:12 PM

Priyanka, avoid to bet on weak teams or median. Always try to look at the games of great teams (Barcelona, Chelsea, Man Utd ...). Look also for alloys in the first division, second and third happens many surprises, very balance. This weekend there are many interesting games. Here's some that want to invest:


Chelsea-Hull City
Arsenal Aston VIlla x
Frankfurt-Bayern Munich
Borussia Dortmun x Eintracht Braus ...
PSG x Ajaccio


Tomorrow I put more games I'm analyzing invest
#17
Sports Betting Forum / Re: Handicaps
August 15, 2013, 11:38:10 AM
Quote from: Priyanka on August 15, 2013, 09:45:02 AM
What are they? Trying to understand, but seems very difficult to get hold of a simple explanation. Can someone help?


Do not go down that road...


Try to learn about trading bets. It's the same idea of ​​investing in stocks, only in this case, in sports actions.


:thumbsup:
#18
Sports Betting Forum / Re: Starter for 10
August 15, 2013, 11:34:41 AM
For me, the strategy is to always bet that I can recover in a short-term (maximum 30 days). The majority of my losses, I recover the same day, others take 2 to 3 days. The secrets is to maximize your earnings, have a balance between wins and losses.


I recommend that you look at this site([size=78%]http://www.apostaganha.pt/prognosticos-activos/[/size])[/size][size=78%], it contains predictions on matches that will happen. It is very interessate to understand how you should think about when going to place a bet[/size]
#19
Sports Betting Forum / Re: Starter for 10
August 15, 2013, 11:18:28 AM

Bet on the Brazilian championship match between Fluminense and Corinthians. Bet against Fluminense, it is a weak club, full of embezzlement and bad phase. The Corinthians is currently the best team in Brazil, so it was not difficult to know that Fluminense would have little chance of winning this match. The result was a tie[attachimg=1]
#20
Sports Betting Forum / Re: Starter for 10
August 15, 2013, 11:07:53 AM
Quote from: Priyanka on August 15, 2013, 02:21:51 AM
I don't think I get it. Actually I thought you always bet for or against a decision. For example, if two players A and B are playing tennis, you either bet for A to win or against A to win. I think I am missing something from what you are trying to get at.
Great going there. Any specific learnings from the initial  loss that you can share?


Exactly, in tennis is different, because we can only have two outcomes, one or the other.


Betting for or against shall remain valid for sports where we have 3 different results, team win "A" team victory "B" or tie. If I bet "against" 'A', I get if I give a tie or 'B' win. If I bet 'for' from 'A', only get if 'A' win. That's the idea. I recommend you to see video on youtube about Betfair, trading betting, betting for and against ...


I'll post some pictures of my results
#21
Sports Betting Forum / Re: Starter for 10
August 14, 2013, 05:36:21 PM
Betfair is the best site to make money with sports betting. The house is unlike any other, because in Betfair you bet on a structure similar to the stock market, where there are bets for or against the results.


About the style of play, do not use any betting system. I prefer to bet against the results, called LAY. And I think yes, it is very important to the sport in question. I bet on football, which is my passion since childhood and I follow. I bet championships in Brazil, England, Spain, Italy, France, Russia, Ukraine, the Netherlands, Portugal and others, I have the opportunity to follow. I'm not a criterion of percentage of bankroll, simply bet a value that I know I can recover. The big secret is that you can maximize your successes and minimize your losses. In the first few months, I lost a lot of money, because I was still in the process of learning, today, can have a very good balance and on average make $ 500 a week ... some weeks more, some less, but always with a good balance to the end of the month. Nowadays, I play roulette  because I like, but gain much more money with sports betting on betfair.
#22
Dozen/Column / Re: The Wizard's Supper
August 07, 2013, 11:20:51 PM
Quote from: Priyanka on August 07, 2013, 11:05:29 PM
I have used a double dozen negative progression of 1,3,9 here. I have started using postive progression now which is working well.







I will test using the ideas of Stetson Bailey, "Foolporof method".
Increases one unit when you win or when you lose ... reet progression when the balance is positive


I'll post the results
#23
Dozen/Column / Re: The Wizard's Supper
August 07, 2013, 09:46:58 PM
Quote from: Priyanka on August 07, 2013, 01:35:24 PM


[reveal]
Good win ratio in the spins you posted and +15u at the end of 100 spins and 20 betting opportunities.

[csv=,]
,LD,BR

2,virtual loss. Bet on Last two dozens,3
1,loss,1
3,virtual loss. Bet on Last two dozens,1
1,win,4
1,,4
2,virtual loss. Bet on Last two dozens,4
3,loss,3
2,,3
1,virtual loss. Bet on Last two dozens,3
2,win,6

[/csv]
[/reveal]



You increases 3 chips each dozen after loss? Always?
What is the criterion of bets?
#24
Street / Re: Speedy González
August 02, 2013, 10:30:33 AM
Quote from: Priyanka on August 02, 2013, 01:26:48 AM

For - loss
Against - loss. Double loss, next bet is same as last.
Against - loss
For - loss. Double loss, next bet is same as last.
For - W/L


Thanks, Priyanka!!!


:thumbsup:
#25
Street / Re: Speedy González
August 01, 2013, 01:00:40 PM
Quote from: Priyanka on July 30, 2013, 10:45:32 PM
Now watch him walking the streets of roulette. He was dancing merrily on the BV Single Zero real table for a 50$ bankroll.

Speedy Gonzalez

Trackers, analysis and results over more spins to follow. If time permits, a bot for BV to follow! Enjoy the summer and enjoy Mr. Speedy González doing the "Jarabe Tapatío". Ariba! Ariba!

@Chris, hope you don't have the mute the video and switch on your music. I have taken the pleasure to do that for you!


Priyanka, if I have a double loss, the next bet is the same as the last, is not it? If I have a third,  fourth loss (Ex: L (-) A (-) A (-)  L or A?()) The fourth betting continues A until I win or reach the Stop / Loss?




#26
Double-street / Re: Hot Lines D'Alembert
July 20, 2013, 11:10:35 AM
Quote from: HarryJ on July 20, 2013, 10:58:28 AM
Hi Breno,
      Just clarify this for me, you only bet if the difference between the hot and cold Double streets is in between 9 and 12??  You then bet the Hot 3. If the difference drops below 9 or goes over 12 you stop betting??
I agree with Nick, this involves too much recording and calculation for most players to handle manually. It would be great in a bot.
   Keep in mind that DS"s often seem to drop off the planet for an incredible number of spins. This could cost you a lot of betting oportuaties when your DS"s get too hot.


Yes Harry, this is exactly!!!  :thumbsup:




One detail, when the difference is greater than 12 starts a new count.
Now of course, the system can have variations, as you said, the hots may be hotter than ever ... I will do more tests, without a maximum difference (9 - X)
#27
Even chance / Re: Triple shooter for even chances
July 19, 2013, 04:42:38 PM
Quote from: asterix90 on July 19, 2013, 03:47:57 PM

Kindly, can anyone point me to original post of FLAT_INO's LvF method ? I can't find it


Thanks.



http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=11088.30
#28
Double-street / Re: Hot Lines D'Alembert
July 19, 2013, 11:57:17 AM
Quote from: Nickmsi on July 19, 2013, 02:57:48 AM
Hey Breno . . .

Interesting concept utilizing unique lines (Double Streets).

I am leaving for a little vacation to visit my grandsons but when I return I would like to try and code this into an Excel Tracker as it is a bit much to do manually.

Thanks for the post.

Will be in touch.

Cheers

Nick





Ok Nick, no problem! The tracker excel would be interesting to test several sessions, and see the strengths and weaknesses of the system.
Some variations  D'Alembert may also be made, for example:


Mode 1: Increment 1 unit on each bet (+1 after loss / +1 after win) until the balance staying positive.


Example - Mode 1:



L                   1         -1
L                   2         -3
L                   3         -6
L                   4        -10
W     5                      -5
L                  6         -11
L                  7         -18
W      8                   -10
W      9                    -1
W     10                   11 




Mode 2: Or  increments 1 unit whe you lose, and keeps the last unit lost while wins.


Example - Mode 2:



L             1       -1
L             2       -3
L             3       -6
L             4      -10
W   5                -5
L             4        -9
W   5                -4
L             4       -8
L             5       -13
W   6               -7
W   5               -2
W   5                3
#29
Double-street / Hot Lines D'Alembert
July 18, 2013, 11:22:35 PM

Playing sextuplets in the heat riser D'Alembert

Choose combination
Sextuplets consecutive, from 1/6 to 31/36
Mark in a special book: the sextuplets and generates a total output of sextuplets progressive individual.

Attack time
You have to add up the total of the outputs of the three most frequent sextuplets (Hot) and total three sextuplets less frequent (cold).
Which calculates the diiferenza between the two totals, and based on the result:
 if less than expected 9
 if greater than or equal to 9 and less than 12 points
 if it is equal to 12 closes the connection and resets the count of total
When the condition occurs, the three sextuplets are frequently brought into play only if they are unique.
means clear that there should be only one group of three to sixfold whose sum is higher. In case there are more than one would expect that still the most frequent one.
To simplify the concept, the fourth most frequent sestina does not have to be equal to the third.

Bailout
The principle of the game is the progression D'Alembert. You puts a piece in each of the three sextuple.
If the shot is lost if you add a piece gained decreases.
It may happen that an attack should be stopped because there is no more conditions, that moment is still pending and the next time it starts from the point where you stopped the progression.
The bet is one piece, but belt should be 3 parts, then you have to be careful to select the correct case.

The zero
The goal counts as a missed shot and then add the pieces focused on the set of background.

Conclusions
Putting into play 18 numbers, in effect simulating a simple chance. Playing three matches in a time of progression overdraft can skyrocket. It is still a very efficient and useful to do some courses active attack.
'System a bit' and complex to manage, because you have to calculate various sums, but with a book well structured and a little training, there are problems to take it to the mat.

Here's an example attached


[attachmini=1]
#30
General Discussion / Re: Stetsons method
July 17, 2013, 10:20:13 PM
Quote from: dave_guy on May 26, 2013, 05:03:45 PM
His method requires 10 hours of play a day at a $5.00 table. I am good for 4 or 5 hours and difficult to find a $5.00 dollar table where I live (Niagara Falls). I do not make $1000.00 per day as my increment betting is smaller then $5 increments at times and is required by the book.

I am making $25.00 to $40.00 per hour. Our tables only get approx 30 to 35 decisions per hour. Stetsons based his on 55

Here is my work for last Saturday May 18th with 4 hrs and 20 minutes of play on a $15.00 table playing on the Pass line only.

It looked like this...mmmpmppmmpppp 7/13  pmmmpmpmpppmp 6/13 mmpmmppppmmmp 6/13
mpmpmmppmmpmmm 4/13 mpppmpppppmmm 8/13 ppmppmppmpmmm 7/13 pppppmpmmmpmp 8/13
mmmmmppmmmppm 4/13 ppmmmmpmppmmm 5/13 mppmmmpppppmp 8/13 pmppm (end at 5pm)

I just added up the decisions it is 132/132 if my addition is correct, a 50/50 game based on approx 30 decisions per hour.  It does not always work out like this but close all of the time based on about 4 hours of play or more in my 4 years of charting experience.


Dave, why you split decisions in part X(pass) / 13? You play Foolprof? You have a stop / loss and win per session? In each new positive balance you restart the progression?