Quote from: dino246 on December 20, 2012, 10:11:33 PM
Bwiz...when you have a winner,if that line qualifies as a Trigger line,do you bet the next line ?

Dino, personally I don't, I prefer to start looking for completely fresh trigger. It's all voodoo of course...

Quote from: soggett on December 21, 2012, 07:32:00 AM
I think with a stopp loss/ win goal of  -10/6 units this could be awesome
you see 3 losses in a row rarely, in your example even 4 in a row - a sign the session went bad, just stop and rest, return later
also what ND said, 2 out of 3 sessions
lol, 2 out of 3 system aims to win 2 out of 3 sessions

I agree 100% soggett. ND has it spot on. 2 out of 3 sessions to win. +6 stop win -10 or 3L in a row count as a lost session.
I will keep running with the testing to see how frequent the LLL happens
Cheers guys

Tough session


9
18
3   -2
7
35
31
20
32 -2
8
8
5
30
11
23
25
3
7   -4
36
9
18
20  -2
9
1
12
35  0
5
16
32  0
25
28
3
24
7
9
7
27
8   +2
15
19
13
19
18
21
1
36 +2
34
29
27
2   +4
16
36
15  +6
23
31
11  +6
26
5
11
18  +6
1
17
7   +4
6
11
5   +4
12
10
16  +2
10
5
8
15
32  +4
24
10
4    +2
2
36
7
31
18
34
28  +2
17
15
30
31
5
5   0
26
11
10
4   -2
16
34
26  -2
14
13
13
1
3    -4
9
3
27
24  -2
10
32
11
29
5   -2
26
12
9
12  -4
27
10
34
31
19
1   -4
36
13
33
22 -4
5
7
12
18 -6
36
16
20 -6
33
27
22 -6
6
9
3
21
3   -8
29
4
24
6   -10
5
20
30
4   -10
6
31
23
12 -8
6
9
15
14 -8
34
11
21
8
8
5
17
12 -8
10
19
9
5   -10
23
30
10 -8
30
17
34
33
26
28 -10
18
21
21
22
3
34
12
10  -10
33
18
9
3
17
35  -10
35
19
3   -10
36
25
16 -10
11
30
25
1  -10
10
28
2   -12
4
27
33
35 -14
12
24
2
30 -14
15
27
25
32
26 -14
18
32
16 -16
32
14
17 -14
33
2
6
7
9
4
7
7
15
11 -16

Quote from: dino246 on December 20, 2012, 08:30:54 PM
Hey Bwiz,if you have a method that Flat bets,that's good enough for me.

There was another concept by Maui 13 on the "other" forum that had a very good strike-rate on the first step of the progression that could be flat betted like your method.

There could be a future with these type of methods.

To be continued.....

I see, well it's definitely worth looking into

A few - I'm always wary of introducing progression to it for obvious reasons - only problem is, you could start after a -2, but then draw level with a couple of 0's, and then encounter another -2 etc as soggett says. It is a slow and cautious method, but by all means maybe a mild level up would be a positive tweak.

Hi Dino,


All but one I got to +1 and above. The other hovered at -10 before attempting a comeback but I left it in the cheap minus.
That's the beauty, you can leave it with a small loss, knowing next time you can recoup it as there isn't a huge progression to claw back.


Continuing from where I left off:


30
15 +2
16
12
14
22
9
1
11
31 +2
4
13
26 +2
24
36
16 +2
16
5
29 +4
36
30
4
35
8
4
27
31
16 +6
6
11
23 +8
19
1
36 +8
25
10
3
13
6   +8
4
35
4
16
25 +10
3
33
21
4   +12
4
32
20
9   +14
33
21
7   +14
36
28
29 +14
36
24
12 +14
35
34
35
8
25
21
18
34
12 +12
5
5
9
18
3   +10
7
35
31
20
32 +10
8
8
5
30
11
23
25
3
7   +8
36
9
18
20  +10
9
1
12
35  +12
5
16
32  +12
25
28
3
24
7
9
7
27
8   +14
15
19
13
19
18
21
1
36  +14
34
29
27
2   +16
16
36
15  +18
23
31
11  +18
26
5
11
18  +18
1
17
7   +16
6
11
5   +16
12
10
16  +14
10
5
8
15
32  +16
24
10
4   +14
2
36
7
31
18
34
28  +14
17
15
30
31
5
5   +12

My pleasure Vic,

Note the consistency here....therefore Discipline and Patience are key as ND has said


4
32
13
33
11  -2
13
27
27
23
31
17  -2
26
10
23  0
19
1
22  +2
21
28
13
35
30  +4
8
8
33
20
28  +2
3
30
21
24  +2
29
8
36
1
25
14  +2
24
1
28
32
29  +2
31
33
22
33  0
29
8
26
15  0
26
33
17  0
12
34
27  0
27
23
6   
28
20  -2
15
8
23  0
33
1
1
16
31  +2
34
5
21
21  0
19
8
16
29  +2
14
36
33  +4
11
32
6
18
12  +2
26
1
4
30
8
10
15
30  +4
17
19
17
1
27 +4
2
2
34
13
5
29  +4
9
30
31
18
7
13
10  +4
8
14
22  +4
19
12
20
26
5
17
7   +2
5
9
21
2   +2
32
3
23
21  0

34
14
36 -2
6
17
12 -2
28
29
12 0
30
10
25
1   
30 0
31
21
18 +2
1
23
28 +4
3
35
1
35
30
19
15 +6
9
28
18
18
23
30
10 +8
18
30
9   +8
21
17
25
24
31
18  +10
29
2
32
13
23
36
26  +10
11
33
22  +10
32
5
16
20  +12
16
36
22  +12
1
9
19
8    +14
9
20
23
21
25
19
19
18
36
21  +14
32
34
31
32
17
18
19
36
1    +14
35
31
33
21
12  +16
6
20
4    +14
15
1
19  +14
5
27
13  +14
31
3
27
33  +14
4
10
19
24
7
17
12  +14
10
2
7
3
8
27
32
26  +14

6
13 trigger bet HR
25 WIN +2
18
18
0
3
17 trigger bet HE
19 DRAW +2
19
0
30
3
26
33 trigger bet LR
36 DRAW +2
35
11 trigger bet RE
15 LOSS 0
36
7
35
29
0
31
36
10
29
15 trigger bet RE
29 LOSS -2
17

I'll accept that small loss there and into the next!

Hello everyone,


Thought I'd bring this over here as it is still holding up nicely. Here are the rules and as ever, all questions, testing and criticisms are most welcome!


First I will highlight with numbers.


Our trigger to bet is when any two consecutive spins have 2 and only 2 matching EC. Doesn't matter which EC


So:


Wait for any spin to occur




29   or in other words Black, High, Odd or in other words BHO


20   Ah ha! A trigger because 29 and 20 have 2 matching ECs, the High and the Black.


Here is another example:


14 RLE


12  This is not a trigger because they have 3 matching ECs


30  This is a trigger because they have RED and EVEN


I hope you understand the trigger.


Now the bet is to attack the two opposite EC than the two trigger ECs.


Confused?


Here's an example using the above numbers


12


30  Trigger. Now bet BLACK and ODD


That is it!!


Use mild progression if you please or short marty 1,2,4 or try flat bet.

Yes, same as all others I'm sure, but you can also win a few chips in between other methods too. 35 units isn't a calamity unlike some progressions

 
Ran another 1000 spins. 109 wins to 3 losses +4

Maybe it won't be worthwhile in long run, too slow and impractical

A further 300 spins:

+41

Another 400 random.org sample

+51

Still holding up- remember 1 loss is -35 so I'm expecting 2 or 3 in close succession soon

 It seemed feasible to me after 1000 spins. Will test some more today.