Some crazy Monkeys in the Forum Post-Editor now folks.....check them out!


[smiley]monkey/crazy-monkey-emoticon-106.gif[/smiley]
This is me trying to learn coding! ha ha!

I like black! lol (I look slimmer in Black)


Can do Red + too.....shall we try it? [smiley]aes/confused.png[/smiley]


EDIT
Actually, joking aside, I did "Male-Chicken-up" there didn't eye, as I identified the advantage-
(that were not many blacks in the 3rd Column), but then in error, bet on the wrong colour to cover the abundance of reds in that Col_3


I will change the original post to reflect the need to bet on RED, not Black.
Thanks Yanks for pointing that obvious error.
cheers.
C

With a Wooden Mallet? [smiley]aes/pirate.png[/smiley]

---

I am liking  your thinking here A....lets hope this Matrix idea doesn't go the way of all the other one's
and divide a community!


Maybe Priyanka or other coder, could knock us up a quick tracker, that show us just when and where to bet.
At least the betting opportunities will come a lot quicker.
It could work i suppose! [smiley]aes/pizza.png[/smiley]

Chasing the 3rd Col_


I invite all to come and comment.
Background.....


Today, I spotted Priyank's Roulette Assist Tracker, and duly downloaded it.


When I saw the small, neat GUI of the Felt/Table layout, I was immediately struck by something......
that, when viewed above like that, and in the Vertical plane as seen,
there are noticeably more Blacks in Col_1 and Col_2  .......than Blacks in Col_3


Now I my guess is this has been talked about for years, in the various portals of Roulette chatter,
and where players congregate, but I never noticed it so blatantly before.


I wonder what work has been done on it, with a view to tracking until say you have 3 or 4 landings in the Col_3
and then bet RED+ Col_1 +Col_2 in a concerted pattern to say win three in a row. [smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]
Then re-track.
Obviously, Zero is a 'bummer' outcome. [smiley]aes/erm.png[/smiley]


I just played a small 52 spin game at Bet Voyager European Roulette, and quickly made it to +50 Euros,
playing with 1.00 unit value when betting, and 0.01 when tracking.
I was in fun money, so there was no pressure.....!


I played a little "Out-Of-Balance" game, with more units on the EC (RED) and equal bets on the two Col_(s)


Just wondered what anyone thought.
Yes, I know its mechanical......again, but looks like there is a very small advantage to be had, if there are a few
previous spins landing in Col_3, and therefore reduce the drawdown.
(Especially, if those previous spins were on 6/15/24/33 ......only four Black Numbers in Col_3)


I also, had a staking plan with a reverse gear, after 3 wins, so I could still play the advantage bet,
but not give away my BR net gain so quickly.


Start bet was :- 4 RED+ 2 Col_1 + 2 Col_2 = 8 units total = my base level (lets call it +1)


then + 2 level was a Marty on all 8 RED+ 4+ 4Col_(s)= 16


The lower bets were:- 2 RED      +1      +1 Col_(s) = 4      (called that level -1)
and.......                       1 RED   +0.5 +  0.5 Col_(s) = 2      (level -2)
and.......                    0.5 RED +0.25+ 0.25 Col_(s) = 1      (level -3)
and......                   0.25 RED +0.13+ 0.13 Col_(s) = 0.51 (level -4)


All those lower values are like a reverse gear, even when winning, to slow down any potential give away.


I used 0.01 on RED to track all other bets with, looking for Col_3 spins.
I will leave this with U, until next time!
cheers
[attachimg=1]   .........          [attachimg=2]

[attachimg=3]

BTW, I have since concluded, the Imbalance across the EC/Col_(s), is not required.
It need balance!)

A new Screen layout at BV with archive comparison of the SHA256 delivered numbers/spins.


U can now check/compare much easier/quicker.
[attach=1]

He is still around.

I see his name appear on the "Who's On Line" stats at the bottom of the home page.
He is looking in now and again.

I'm sure he will post again, even if he isn't answering his PM's just at the moment. [smiley]afb/wait.gif[/smiley]

Very nice offer Yanks
It works fine on my Windows Vista m/c


[smiley]afb/tup.gif[/smiley]

Queer as....................and more memorable for the Historians of the future! 

Is it me, or did anyone else see what I saw, when I first viewed Atlantis's post in Quad Cycle topic proper?

Quote
424344431124404342244414
334222133341121221442414
412424411221221244322214
412114422242224333121422
311144133422044411221214
144221244424314143414242
211.

Is there a Matrix in the house?
No..........Oh............is there a Doctor in the house then, instead!!?
Arr well, never there when U need one.
Anyway...

If we re-draft this collection of numbers, into other form, like say
12 x 12, I wonder what we get?

424344431124
404342244414
334222133341
121221442414
412424411221
221244322214
412114422242
224333121422
311144133422
044411221214
144221244424
314143414242
211.
What, or more precisely, could we exploit in this Matrix?

Well, how about the repeat of a Diagonal Array on the fourth Line?
Or fifth if fourth failed?

Can U see the diagonal line here:-?

424344431124
404342244414
334222133341
121221442414
412424411221
221244322214
412114422242
224333121422
311144133422
044411221214
144221244424
314143414242
211.

Is this an illusion, or just JL all over again, and superman comes along and says
[revealB]Won't work, can't work..............[/revealB]

"knock- Knock"
"Who's there?"

"Its the Invisible Man!"
"I'm sorry mate, I can't see you today, I'm busy!!"

Do your snails do a "turn" at the weekends?


Or shall we put them down for the next "Turner" prize?? 

Ok...for sure, tho if U re-read his small example, he does re-track until there are 4 in a row, non repeats and then plays again.
I guess, U could as U say, take up the next level, as U will be potentially down by 5 units, on a complete 5 series loss,
(which, if U think about it, is a Cycle in itself!!) lol


I see what U mean! 

Reminds me of this news story recently:-


http://www.sickchirpse.com/manchester-museum-statue/

i think he means to bet "blind" that after 4 tracker, non repeat numbers,
U then bet that the next number will repeat, and so on for the next 5 series numbers.


I think so! 

@A

if 15 is the largest space between repeats, less your four tracker, u still need a Nine Point progression list.
Any suggestions?
C

---

Sorry I did not at first see your bet limited to 5 suggestion.