I can tell what I told to Ignatus in some other forum

Well the thing is no matter what you do, no matter what pattern you create, no matter with which odds, no matter wheel or carpet based one thing will be for sure.

They will all be "exposed" to perfectly same possible deviations in random (for deviations in spheres of roulette of course), which is actualy biggest problem in roulette, not house edge as many think (you wouldn't give a thing for zeros striking if your max losing streak would be enough to overcome it with progression before touching table limits).

That is mathematical fact.

Problem with this approach as yours John is that thinking solving that variance is so simple and absurd.

Because that should be taken as biggest thing in your whole approach of hit and run, that way it works and you allegedly have such results as you claim, you are aware of that right?

So we can say that what you do is collide two randomness. Random in game and random in short entrance point of betting and you expect not to have results with all characteristics of randomness such as variance in this case. You think that way you have reduced it and avoided in quite wide arc. That is illogical and absurd, and most important it can be proven. All can be proved except your results you have.

The other problem with you and this approach is actualy in proving it (with right way as you say) it can't be proved in scientific simulations (as Bayes and few other did many times) although all conditions can be perfectly correct simulated and verified.
So your agenda here is funny. Especialy when consider so insanely steep MM you use 

Few days ago new member come here, and his first post was: "I played JL-s methods now I have to recover..."

You tried to prove your claims with Bayeses software and Superman-s account but you didn't proved anything, except many many incosistenties in your actualy play, opposite of that what you were saying you will do.

Please just don't tell me wait and you will see, all you do is buying your time here. How long through all your time on forums you are saying wait and I ll show you, you will sing another song then..  Nothing by now. You were saying about some conquering europe casinos last year, but you forgot about it.. It is more important to be here and persuading people that alchemy can be done.

Just don't tell me Chauncy or whoever plays like you is successful and understood "right way". AMK is nice and very honest guy to whom I spoke personaly few times, the one who created one method you are using, well he doesn't plays it nor having money out of roulette as you with this same genius approach. Guess why..

Cheers

Drazen

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 24, 2013, 12:24:48 AM
My methods are the opposite of gamblers fallacy.

John have you been thinking about changing your signature in forum? This sounds much less egoistic, and still explains lots of things about you and your play.

Best

Drazen

It works now 

Thanks

Drazen

Thanks for sharing and great job for start.

I decided to try it, to endorse your wish for free sharing it, but unfortunately I am having problems running it.

Can you suggest possible solution? I attached screenshot what pops out.

Thanks

Drazen

Quote from: Bayes on January 18, 2013, 08:14:57 PM
Hmm... I'd say that's pretty generous. It's enough to live on as long as you don't have too many expensive habits. 

Or move to country with lower life standard and have high life for less money 

In my country that is almost 3 average salaries, and you could live more then decent with that... Open to your wife same account and you can live profligate hehe

And of course, to your cousins also, with appropriate margin, and you can start thinking about expensive habits 

Ah what is life.. 

Cheers

Drazen

These were attacks "beyond" tendency, when signals were very clear that situation went down. True is that start of the attack is on personal judgment and evaluation of the situation more then something like rigid triggers or measuring, but it looks like this most of the time    (when not playing "mode" where using strict Marigny marches for attacks)

Occasionaly, when doesn't goes so flat bet good, are days when I know I ll probably do better in picking girls in the evening... Well, you can't do both so good nor bad at the same day...    Then MM gets a 

LoL LoL

Cheers

Drazen

It would be nice if someone who understands it very well could explain it in short and maybe to say how this could be applyed to roulette.


I was reading about it but its appliance obviously is very wide and complicated to anyone who doesn't have great mathematical knowledge.



I know Bayes once in the past mentioned he was intended to do this, but unfortunately it only left on intention.


Best


Drazen

Quote from: esoito on January 16, 2013, 06:09:22 AM
The ratio, if I recall, is something along the lines that 80% of sales are achieved by 20% of sales staff.

Or, more cynically, 80% of  work is achieved by 20% of workers! 

Yes, Pareto-s rule 


Best


Drazen

Ahh finally, very nice to see you here Sputnik 





Best


Drazen

No I meant on luck general, now when you apparently have never losing thing 


Use it wisely


Drazen

Good luck gents


Drazen

Well John, this is the only method of yours that succeeded in tests.. Other were blasted like out of canon.


Bayes were trying to simulate H.A.R and it failed too. So only thing people had were your words actualy and few words of those who were playing your way also. I personaly think H.A.R (as most of like to call random entry and exit points in play) doesn't mean anything and that is logical if you think about it, but everyone on its own I say.


It would be interesting to see how this method would go with +2 -1 progression.


Now as it goes I expect that someone of those brilliant coders on few platforms we have here, will made tracker and people will be able to earn with no thinking and  knwoing anything at all. (Although I am jealous about giving knowledge and skills for longterm earnings to anyone so I know some will use this, who even doesn't know how many numbers or on the roulette, but what the heck..)  Earn? No. Better to say destroy casinos..


But will it go just like that? The proof is here so, it will be interesting to watch this thread in coming time.. 


Best


Drazen

Congratulations to JL for his method. But if this hits in so good ratio, I think playing not so volatile MM should be fine also, as John said most of the time hits come on first two steps...


Now my only worry is that Vic will start to recieve death threats and he will have to close this forum...    LoL


So all should be advised to copy the rules until is not too late 


Best


Drazen

Thanks mr. Bayes it helps. I have something in mind trying with this.


@ superman


True, many think that gambling could give them independent lifestyle just like that.. Oh that is very very hard to accomplish no matter which way.


Oh numbers of hours I putted in this game is measured in thousands in few years for sure, and still not 100% sure I can beat the game.


But something is interesting here my friend. The way you play can't be tested on millions of spins fast to be sure you can beat it, (as with any other systems you are ding) becasue it can't be coded as you say and pretty much all depends on your personal evaluation of the situation.  You are actualy beating the game in walk.. you never know how session will end and how long will it be. So it seems to me that you are in a way still testing and getting confidence with this by real playing with low limits, even after so many won sessions

Can this be concluded it is better to attack  just after W? If lose wait for another win and attack again? But again, where is bettors judgment here, which superman and you are mentioning, this can automated, right?


Cheers


Drazen