In many countries, they even run casinos (specially illegal ones),
I was......uh,better shut up Flat.
I was......uh,better shut up Flat.
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Albalaha on March 12, 2013, 04:41:52 PM
Flat must have experienced that casinos in Macau even allow using cameras and video cameras openly. Where is Steve's hidden roulette computer? He should shift to Macau.
Quote from: Ralph on March 12, 2013, 12:53:57 PM
It is harder in USA, two zeros and banning if you win. It is not so in Europe. I have seen computers in casinos openly. The casinos trust they will make profit, and takes a HE from 1.3 on EC. You are allowed to win as long the play is fair.
Quote from: Sputnik on March 11, 2013, 03:43:20 PM
Do you believe you can flat betting and win consistently ?
Cheers
Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 11, 2013, 08:41:43 AM
It didn't as yet live playing.We play this throughout night session of about 350 spins,
swapping the tables after any plus,therefore its pure RvR approach,as when we hit the
new table, the bet is followed with the last 9 splits from the previous playing table.
Have you ever though of such approach,mr.Marshall?? Try it you may find it very interesting.
Yes I have mr. flatman and I take my hat off to you for trying this. Not many would have the guts to carry over the current state of their game to a new table. I have been playing systems that jump tables mid game for a while now. I don't know for sure if it improves thing, but it sure won't hurt over the long run, in my opinion.
Playing lvf9 like this will give you a kind of RvR game as long as you keep winning and table jumping, but there will be times when the game catches up and the RvR will be gone.--True,but the final/monthly,
yearly/score counts.There isn't ever winning method.
Is TCS playing like this online?--I suggest it....he tweaked it some....72/81 I think.I never play on line
as don't believe em.
What about when you go home after a day at the casino, do you come back tomorrow, or next week and start the new session with yesterday's or last week's last 9 splits?... always start new night session,and playing last 9 from previous table,even with smoke and coffee breaks,so it comes
to pure RvR......O yes there is to expect losing sessions.....we shall soon see it with Malta trip.
Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 11, 2013, 12:50:05 AM
The system is a good attempt to lower variance, and perhaps break even for a while with some up and down fluctuation, but in the end it will lose at the house edge or above, sorry.
It didn't as yet live playing.We play this throughout night session of about 350 spins,
swapping the tables after any plus,therefore its pure RvR approach,as when we hit the
new table, the bet is followed with the last 9 splits from the previous playing table.
Have you ever though of such approach,mr.Marshall?? Try it you may find it very interesting.
Quote from: spike on March 10, 2013, 08:43:57 PM
Doing this? Its what you said you played om Feb 27th:
"There's no bet selection here,its just random against[size=78%] [/size]
random with a progression.
Quote from: Chrisbis on March 06, 2013, 08:06:29 AM
Totally agree with Bayes comment..........to be playing at single unit level, then u need a factor of at least 1000/u to give decent BR
So, for penny machines (0.01) - that's £$E100.00 , but if the base bet size is 1.00 u need a good deal more to cope with progression.
The payback on EC is so low..........your always rescuing the progression
Im now wondering if Johns idea on Matrix can be applied to Streets or even Lines?? hmmm
[revealB] Making random repeat sequences ....
An EC has only a movement of one...there are only two options in a EC outcome.
A Street event has 12 outcomes And a Line has 6 outcomes.
Maybe random could be tamed here? [/revealB]Right on the nail,Chrisbis,even though those math
philosophers will tell you it is the same thing.