In Cancún this happens on Friday, December 21, 2012 at 5:11:00 AM.

The end of the world is a local phenomenon. It's my favorite you know, Global Effect, and all that, ... bet on zero.

Collision, When Worlds Collide

This is variance gone wild. If you have a genuine skill for making good double dozen bets and good double column bets then you can place bets on the inside that only cover  16 numbers per bet.

If you have a collision of sleeping dozens with a sleeping column you have the perfect storm. You can use it to execute a multiple pull-off grouping of staggered positive progressions.  If you don't know what that is just ask.

The version I like is five units per number. I let one progression ride one spin and take it off, with its winnings. I let the other four units ride with their respective winnings. After the second win I pull off one of the four that has now won two in a row. Of course I takes those winnings off too. That leaves step three, four, and five with their respective winnings for each step.

You don't have to have a collision of variance to try this. You just need to be good at guessing the flow of current conditions. That's not difficult if you are experienced in this area of dozens  and columns. If you get the collisions right you only need 16 numbers to cover it.

Spike, this is you telling you won't give me advice.

Quote from: spike on December 17, 2012, 02:54:54 AM
LOL! I wasn't giving you advice, good god. I don't care
what you do, just don't say you learned it from me. Be happy
with what you do, winning isn't everything...

Since you don't want to give me advice please stop misrepresenting what I'm saying that I do. I have no trouble at all avoiding crashing downturns.  If I didn't know better I would say that you are having difficulty listening to other people. There could be many reasons for this. You could be a deliberate trouble maker, the likes of snowman. He did this all the time. He decided what things were and kept pelting everyone with his red herrings and his straw man arguments. I hope you are not going to turn out like snowman.

Just to see if you have a problem, I'll  repeat it. I have no difficulty avoiding the crashing downturns caused by variance.

Spike, this is you giving me advice.

Quote from: spike on December 16, 2012, 11:17:28 PM
Ya think? That's what you want to avoid, crashing downturns. You
want a nice steady peaceful variance so you can make your goal
and leave. Extreme highs and extreme lows are very costly in
money and in time.

Its like having a conveyer belt in a factory. Do you want it to run real
fast at times, and have lots of breakdowns, or do you want it to run
nice and steady so you know exactly what to expect every day.

The casino is no different. Variance is your enemy, so you want it as
flat as possible. No hills and valleys, just little tiny bumps you can
barely feel, like you're driving a 1958 Lincoln. You're there to make
your goal, not spend hours waiting for the variance to come back
around your way. That's for gamblers and amateurs..

Spike, don't be ridiculous. You can't give me advice. And further, I don't want it. You are clueless to what I do and I am clueless to whatever it is that you are suggesting. I'm happy with what I do. I wouldn't change anything for the world. Go ahead, share what you want. I will find it fascinating. I never looked at randomness remotely in this way. At least I'm really interested. Nobody talks about stuff like this.

I did some looking around. It's just that the thread has a hugantic graph posted in it.

So congratulations to you Victor to sizing this forum to smart sizing. None of the other forums are modern, cool, and with it Daddio.

Now this window works great but on my last post the text entry goes way off screen right on my smart phone. I'm not sure why. This screen is about 86 characters wide. I wonder how that other text entry screen went bonkers?

That's a pretty amazing statement Spike. No wonder we are so different. I deliberately seek out  explosive variance. It's the only reason I go to the casino. Of course there's going to be crashing downturns. You don't have to let them take you out. This is funny. I spend the whole time trying to survive flat variance. I do this so that I can get to wild swings. It's so dang easy for me. Every spin tells you what condition you are currently in. You can take every huge downturn and turn it 180°, all you need is anything that continues. This is an amazing moment in forum history . I had no idea Spike was deliberately seeking flat variance. My stuff must sound like Martian to him. In fact it would be very difficult for me to attempt to read a flat variance. I can't actually say. I do everything I can to avoid it.

Quote from: spike on December 16, 2012, 08:11:34 PM
But its the only way to defeat variance. You want variance
to be flat, no ups and downs. Players get all excited over
winning streaks, but they also mean there will be losing
streaks. A flat variance means you control the game and
its not controlling you. People would be far better off putting
all their time into bet selection than trying to find new ways
to fool the game with progressions and money management.
If you have flat variance, the need for money management
doesn't exist.

Bally, I find it so easy to see it all in real time. It's my charting system. I can see the trends. I don't keep a track for the effectiveness trends. The graph above is the actual effectiveness line. It's an interesting idea to attempt to keep a trend path for the effectiveness. That process might benefit me with better self control.

Nice graph. It validates my premise that a global effect exists. You have a cluster of streak styled directions salted with flat styled back and forth. Sometimes they travel in your favor and sometimes they are against you.

JL

QuoteLanding dead on top of a losss at odds of 242/1 playing H.A.R is very hard to do.

Please explain how you come up with 242 / 1 odds with your version of hit and run?

THIS IS YOUR CHANCE TO PROVE EVERYTHING.

Please don't pass this up. I'm convinced that it's only 7.4 to 1.

Quote from: JohnLegend on December 15, 2012, 03:11:47 PM
Trebor what is your longest and average winning streak over this sample of games?

His average winning streak is posted, it's 7.1/1 . It's right in there with the 7.4/1 expected result.

It sounds very good. I guess I'm just lazy. I cut my teeth on Director/shockwave. Moving over to MetaCard was literally a no brainer.  I just love programming in x-talk type language. Sometimes I use silly sounding variables, commands, and custom named functions to really write an out of this world line of script.

put theCatChased(aDog, upAtree, numFeet) into fishingManStory

Quote from: KingsRoulette on December 14, 2012, 05:26:28 PM
Even opposite is possible if someone get to be as much educated about randomness, as you claim to be.

What's stopping you. I've put it all out there. It's a complete roadmap. You don't need to go off it and make mistakes that I did. How could it get any better than that?

Quote from: KingsRoulette on December 14, 2012, 04:11:03 PM
               Even the poorest would like to win more and lose less, if it is possible, one way or another. If you can do that, you can be compared with Edgar Thorpe.

Edward Thorpe, now that would be a prize. He settled for a groovy weekend and his peers thinking him slightly off a little.

Not wishing to state the obvious, but haven't you heard? "The rich get richer and the poor get poorer." You can even get elected with that one.