Quote from: alrelax on June 21, 2017, 01:33:12 PMAt the request of another board member, Gizmotron, he has pleaded with me to get off the board and remove my posts.  He claims I have degraded this board and chased people away.  (By the way, you might want to ask him about his relationships with other people's money as well and how well he handled being responsible, productive and non-narcissistic, LOL. So, the voting is now open!  If you desire me to get off the board and remove my posts, no problem--vote.  Thanks!

See how the mind of an NPD works. He actually sees things that are not there. When did I ever say that he chased people away?


I told that person that I would divulge everything openly. That is exactly why I did divulge my issues. I kept his name out of it so that he would not be hounded by anyone because of me. It's real interesting how Glen has discovered it. I know I didn't say anything. Are you going to blab his name Glen?


This is how life works Glen. You make your choices and you live with them. If I fail, at least I will not have tried to deceive people in the process. So, why today have you decided to attack me. Are your supplies running low? I know what you are afraid to look at. It's just too bad that your attacks don't have any effect on me. I know what drives you crazy. All I can do is feel sorry for you.

The abuse you are capable of is so self inflicted that you really might want to consider professional help.

Quote from: alrelax on June 21, 2017, 01:16:18 PM
Great, I will swing by Joe's and the Blueberry Almond Joy donuts will be on me!  By the way, please divulge your 'secret method' only 2 people on earth know!  Please, all the roulette players want to make millions and millions of dollars!  Maybe you can get together with an author and write a book??

It's actually 5 people as pointed out by the author TurboGenius. 4 of us came together to discover why the "Turbo Effect" actually worked. You will have to go back to that forum that doesn't put up with your BS to get that context.


I always love it when a narcissist runs to his/her safe zone in a fantasy world inside of a fantasy world. The only thing I want from your donuts is the empty hole.


I disagree with you. Now go ahead and try to figure that out. 

With regards to our resident narcissist and his latest PM: "remember gizo---you promised  (PROMISED TO ALL) to quit gambling!!!!!!!!!!!


I am on the verge of quitting. But, now that I have discovered the source of my focus issues, a discovery made after I thought I was done, it would be stupid to quit now. I'm giving it one more chance. It's my 30 year effort to master the characteristics of randomness with regards to Roulette. My efforts go back to 1996 when I began to write computer sims in order to discover the nature of randomness. Nobody showed me these characteristics. Nobody segregated them or identified them in specific detail. They called it following the trend or "the trend is your friend."


In a few weeks you will have your answer. There is no point in continuing gambling if I can't overcome my own demons. I sure don't need to hold court in residence preaching to people things I can't do myself. Everything is here at this website. There is no need to go on boring people by regurgitating the same old concepts and techniques. I don't have a need to hear the sound of my own voice. I wanted the information published, and it is. You will hear one of two messages from me regarding gambling. One would be that I'm continuing and that things are working out to the point that it is worth it. The other message would be that I'm quitting gambling because I can't keep it together when I'm at a casino.


I don't care about damaged individuals that have so much to deal with that all I can do is feel sorry for them. I can live without gambling and without posting on gambling forums. I just want to be real with myself. So what if I'm a failure or not. Does that make anyone of you and your lives better? Most normal people here don't give a damn about how others really do. They are looking for a usable advantage discovered somewhere in these discussions. To this day I have never heard of another person seeing and taking advantage of an Elegant Pattern, that's a perfect reoccurring pattern for those that don't know it. With so many gamblers in this world I'm fascinated that this one thing has gone on for so long. Elegant Patterns, Global Effect, Sleeping Dozens, swarms of singles in series, and the Effectiveness States are all my legacy. They are terms that I made up to describe conditions of opportunity.


If I quit gambling, these concepts, no matter what they are called or how they are described, will one day put an end to the way that table games in casinos are played. It does not matter that the discoveries were made by a person that could not keep the focus required to take advantage in the first place. But I'm giving it one more real, last chance. You might say that I'm just trying to be real with situational awareness.

I just got this PM from Alrelax:

Quoteremember gizo---you promised  (PROMISED TO ALL) to quit gambling!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you really want to go there, living in a glass house and all that? You are your own favorite fan. You love the sound of your verbose opus of blind aggrandizement.


You've gone from people here serving you as primary narcissistic supply, to secondary narcissistic supply, and now beyond.

QuoteQuestion:How does the narcissist treat his former Sources of Narcissistic Supply? Does he regard them as enemies?
Answer:
The narcissist seeks out his old Sources of Narcissistic Supply when he has absolutely no other NS Sources at his disposal. Narcissists frantically try to recycle their erstwhile and wasted sources in such a situation. But the narcissist would not do even that had he not felt that he could still successfully extract a modicum of NS from the old source (even to attack the narcissist is to recognize his existence and to attend to him!!!).
Contacting a discarded source of supply (known as "hovering" or "re-acquisition") requires its re-idealization. When he dumped and abandoned the old source, the narcissist devalued it: he convinced himself that the defunct source was low-quality, inferior, deficient, defective, hostile, or otherwise "not such a big loss." Now, the narcissist has to recant this appraisal and re-idealize the source without admitting to having been mistaken. To preserve his grandiosity and sense of omniscience, the narcissist comes up with a narrative that accommodates both the devaluing content and the re-idealized image of the source.
Example:
Devaluation: I am highly intelligent and can't maintain a relationship with a stupid person.

Ref: http://samvak.tripod.com/faq76.html

Here is practice using $5 & doubled $5 chips:


wLwwwwwwLwwwwwwwwwwLwwLwww


| 1  2  3 | A  B  C | 0  3  6 | P |
|       X |    X    | X       |   | -- 26
|    X    |       X |    X    |   | -- 15
| X       |    X    | X       | P | -- 2
|    X    |    X    |       X | P | -- 17
|       X |       X |    X    |   | -- 30
|       X | X       |       X | P | -- 31
|       X |       X |       X |   | -- 33
|       X |    X    | X       |   | -- 26
| X       |       X |    X    | P | -- 12
|       X |    X    |    X    |   | -- 29-- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 5
|       X | X       |       X |   |  # 34 -- Won -- 60 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 19 -- Lost  -- -180 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|       X |    X    |    X    |   |  # 29 -- Won -- -60 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 19 -- Won -- 60 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 10
|       X |    X    | X       |   |  # 26 -- Won -- 180
reset to 0 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 5
|    X    |    X    | X       |   |  # 14 -- Won -- 60 -- (Not Prime 22 to win next) @ 10
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   |  # 23 -- Won -- 200
reset to 0 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 5
|    X    |    X    | X       |   |  # 14 -- Won -- 60 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 10
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 15 -- Lost  -- -180 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|       X |    X    |    X    |   |  # 29 -- Won -- -60 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|       X | X       | X       |   |  # 25 -- Won -- 60 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 24 -- Won -- 180
reset to 0 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 5
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 22 -- Won -- 60 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|       X |       X |    X    |   |  # 30 -- Won -- 180
reset to 0 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 5
| X       |       X | X       |   |  # 9 -- Won -- 60 -- (Not Prime 22 to win next) @ 10
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Won -- 200
reset to 0 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 5
|    X    | X       |    X    |   |  # 16 -- Won -- 60 -- ( 0's & 6's to win next) @ 10
|-------------------| X       | P |  # 37 -- Won -- 160
reset to 0 -- ( 3's & 6's to win next) @ 5
| X       | X       |    X    |   |  # 7 -- Won -- 60 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
| X       |    X    |       X | P |  # 5 -- Lost  -- -180 -- (Not Prime 22 to win next) @ 10
|       X |       X |    X    |   |  # 30 -- Won -- -40 -- (Not Prime 22 to win next) @ 10
|    X    |    X    |       X |   |  # 20 -- Won -- 100 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|    X    | X       | X       |   |  # 13 -- Lost  -- -140 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 10
|       X |    X    | X       |   |  # 35 -- Won -- -20 -- (Not Prime 22 to win next) @ 10
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 24 -- Won -- 120 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 10
|    X    |       X |       X | P |  # 18 -- Won -- 240

Quote from: ybot on June 14, 2017, 01:01:45 PM
To take advantage of past data you must find propper[sic] standard deviation to a certain bet in the past and check in a brand new

Do any of you really expect Roulette to adventure beyond the realms of standard deviation? It can't. Whatever you are currently experiencing, if the wheel is fair, you will not find anything that is not normal. Now if you have found the only single broken wheel still being used in the world then that is another story. It's almost impossible to believe there are still biased wheels out there being used. Yet, people base all their play on these contraptions.

Quote from: wannawin on June 09, 2017, 05:58:23 PM
How many spins back should be used to say that a bet is:

* Hot
* Warm
* Cold

what is the universal formula to calculate this? Be it baccarat or roulette or another game. if you can back it up with math the better. Thank you.

If you use math as the standard then you get a specific point where if your group of numbers in Roulette hits more than the statistical average then you could say that the grouping is warmer than normal. If your grouping hits less then it could be considered cold. There is a balance point in all bets that take more than one spin to reach balance. Take the dozens and a grouping of 24 numbers for instance. You need two wins to balance one loss. With Even Chance groupings you need one win for every loss to balance.

So Hot, Warm, and Cold are probably best used to describe how a session is doing against its own known balance points.

To take that even further, you might want to watch how effective you are at timing your guesses best. Even though you might have a dominant trend, your timing could be off enough for you to pick all the losers for a good stretch. It takes more than just recognizing the hot streaks. The universal formula is to know what is going on while you gamble.

I just did a round trip to the casino with 700 miles of driving and 5 hours of live play. The new method of charting works perfectly. I had no distractions because I had nothing to look at. I stayed focused on my 12 sets of dozens and the four groupings.

Quote from: owenslv on June 14, 2017, 02:48:51 AM
OK;

I can see where 1 2 3 are the dozens and A B C are the columns - right?

What is 0 3 6 ?

What is P ?

On the American Wheel.



0's is the three numbers on either side of the 0 & 00 making up a total of 14 numbers, including both zeros.


The 3's are the numbers left that are not the 0's or the 6's. There are 12 of them. (3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 23, 24, 29, 30)


The 6's are the numbers either side of 6 & 5, (5, 6, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 31, 32, 33, 34)


In my practice software, available at the school forum, there is a button to select the European wheel where these shapes are the same but the groups are set to the European wheel instead.


The P's are short for the Primes, a pet set of 16 numbers that are the zeros, and the numbers either side of the zeros the 5 & 6 and the numbers either side of them, and the center numbers of the 3's. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 27, 28, 31, 32, 0, 00)


I've opened the school back up because of so much interest. The practice software is worth it alone. It teaches you to be tactical, patient, and not to be greedy. It also runs on it's own making selections so that you can learn from examples.

Quote from: Sputnik on June 13, 2017, 08:21:13 AM
Nice Winnings Kimo Li - that is hard core :-)

Cheers

I wonder what the buy-ins were? This gives new meaning to cherry picking possibilities. These images are subjective at best. I'm surprised that they were offered as evidence. Where's the Good Housekeeping Approval sticker? Are they UL approved?

I do it all the time. I use an index card with the lines running vertical and this at the top:


| 1  2  3 | A  B  C | 0  3  6 | P |

You just put X's where the hits are.

Quote from: Kimo Li on June 12, 2017, 08:35:59 PM
Can your Global Effect do this?

I don't need help being honest. There's not a person here that can help me do that.


The global effect is like having 90% of your bets win for a stretch from 30 to 90 spins or longer in a single stretch. Do the math. With $25 straight up bets placed on 24 numbers per spin, with a win rate of 90% at $300 for each win and $600 for each loss you end up with $-5400 in losses, $24,300 in winnings, for a net win of $18,900. If you were to use $100 bets that would end up being a net win of $75,600.

I'm just trying to give away something that works.

There are people in this world that think that any pet set of numbers are more important than any other set or grouping. It is only at times that these special grouping have value, like the global effect or the perfect pattern. Domination of singles, doubles, or sleepers only add to the fact that these characteristics are far more important than any arbitrary shape formed by locations on the wheel.

Don't slip a Hemi or you might end up blowing a Universal Joint.


I really don't care. Smoke and mirror mambo jumbo doesn't do anything but sell books. The table layout is all that is needed to beat this game. Shoe shinning the mystery of slot locations on the wheel is just sophistry to sell books. That's my opinion of your contribution to gambling. If you don't like it then don't read it. It's exactly how I have decided to take your works. I don't like it and I don't read it.

Here is another AI session:


LwwwLwwLLwwwwwLLwwLwLLwwwwwwwwwwwLwLLwLLwLwLLwwwwwwwwL

| 1  2  3 | A  B  C | 0  3  6 | P |
| X       | X       |    X    | P | -- 4
|       X | X       | X       |   | -- 25
|    X    |       X |    X    |   | -- 24
| X       |    X    |    X    | P | -- 11
|    X    |       X |       X |   | -- 21
| X       |       X | X       |   | -- 9
|    X    |    X    | X       |   | -- 14
|    X    | X       |       X |   | -- 19
|       X |    X    | X       |   | -- 26
|       X |    X    | X       |   | -- 35
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- 0 -- (No Bet) -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X |       X | P |  # 6 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |    X    | X       |   |  # 26 -- Won -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |    X    |    X    |   |  # 29 -- Won -- 0 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X | X       |   |  # 9 -- Won -- 0 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |    X    |   |  # 16 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( 0's & 6's to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|-------------------| X       | P |  # 37 -- Won -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
| X       |    X    | X       | P |  # 2 -- Won -- 0 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |       X |       X | P |  # 18 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Won -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X |    X    | P |  # 3 -- Won -- 12 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X |       X | P |  # 6 -- Won -- 24 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |       X |   |  # 21 -- Won -- 60 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X |    X    | P |  # 3 -- Won -- 96 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
|       X |    X    |    X    |   |  # 29 -- Lost  -- 48 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|-------------------| X       | P |  # 38 -- Lost  -- 48 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    | X       | X       |   |  # 13 -- Won -- 48 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
|    X    |       X |       X | P |  # 18 -- Won -- 60 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
| X       |       X |       X | P |  # 6 -- Lost  -- 36 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |       X |    X    |   |  # 30 -- Won -- 36 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
|       X |       X | X       | P |  # 27 -- Lost  -- 12 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       |    X    | P |  # 4 -- Lost  -- 12 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Won -- 12 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|       X | X       |       X | P |  # 31 -- Won -- 24 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
| X       |    X    |    X    | P |  # 11 -- Won -- 36 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       |    X    | P |  # 4 -- Won -- 60 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       | X       | P |  # 1 -- Won -- 96 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       |    X    | P |  # 4 -- Won -- 120 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       | X       | P |  # 1 -- Won -- 144 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       |    X    | X       | P |  # 2 -- Won -- 168 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
|    X    |    X    |       X |   |  # 20 -- Won -- 192 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       |    X    |    X    |   |  # 8 -- Won -- 216 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       |    X    | X       | P |  # 2 -- Won -- 240 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 22 -- Lost  -- 192 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 15 -- Won -- 192 -- ( 0's & 6's to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
|    X    | X       |    X    |   |  # 16 -- Lost  -- 166 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
| X       | X       |    X    |   |  # 7 -- Lost  -- 166 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X | X       | X       | P |  # 28 -- Won -- 166 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
| X       |    X    | X       | P |  # 2 -- Lost  -- 142 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 15 -- Lost  -- 142 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Won -- 142 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
|       X |       X |       X |   |  # 33 -- Lost  -- 118 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   |  # 23 -- Won -- 118 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 22 -- Lost  -- 94 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|-------------------| X       | P |  # 38 -- Lost  -- 94 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   |  # 23 -- Won -- 94 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |    X    |   |  # 16 -- Won -- 106 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |       X |   |  # 19 -- Won -- 118 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |       X |   |  # 21 -- Won -- 142 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   |  # 23 -- Won -- 166 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       | X       | P |  # 1 -- Won -- 190 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 2 -- Singles
| X       |       X | X       |   |  # 9 -- Won -- 214 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 2 -- Singles
|    X    |    X    |       X | P |  # 17 -- Won -- 238 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 2 -- Singles
| X       |    X    |    X    | P |  # 11 -- Lost  -- 190 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles

Here is an example where Artificial Intelligence was turned on:

wwLLwwwwLLwwwLwwwwww

| 1  2  3 | A  B  C | 0  3  6 | P |
|       X |    X    | X       |   | -- 26
|       X |       X |    X    |   | -- 30
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   | -- 23
|       X |    X    |       X | P | -- 32
|    X    | X       | X       |   | -- 13
|    X    |    X    |       X |   | -- 20
|    X    |    X    | X       |   | -- 14
|       X | X       |       X |   | -- 34
|    X    |    X    |       X |   | -- 20
| X       |    X    | X       | P | -- 2
|    X    |    X    |    X    |   |  # 23 -- (No Bet) -- 0 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
| X       |       X |       X | P |  # 6 -- Won -- 0 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    |    X    |       X | P |  # 17 -- Won -- 0 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|       X |       X |    X    |   |  # 30 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       |    X    |   |  # 16 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
| X       |    X    |       X | P |  # 5 -- Won -- 0 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |       X |       X |   |  # 21 -- Won -- 0 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
| X       | X       | X       |   |  # 10 -- Won -- 0 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|       X |       X | X       |   |  # 36 -- Won -- 0 -- ( A & B to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 24 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|    X    |    X    |       X |   |  # 20 -- Lost  -- 0 -- ( 1 & 3 to win next) @ 0 -- Singles
|       X |       X | X       | P |  # 27 -- Won -- 0 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       | X       |   |  # 13 -- Won -- 12 -- ( B & C to win next) @ 1 -- Singles
|    X    |       X |       X |   |  # 21 -- Won -- 24 -- (2 & 3 to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
| X       | X       | X       |   |  # 10 -- Lost  -- -48 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 0 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |    X    |   |  # 24 -- Won -- -48 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
|    X    | X       | X       |   |  # 13 -- Won -- -36 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 1 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X |    X    | P |  # 3 -- Won -- -24 -- ( A & C to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
|    X    |       X |       X | P |  # 18 -- Won -- 12 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
| X       |       X | X       |   |  # 9 -- Won -- 48 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 3 -- Sleepers
|    X    |    X    |       X | P |  # 17 -- Won -- 84 -- ( 1 & 2 to win next) @ 2 -- Sleepers