From100,

It's not already known stuff unless anyone has figured it out from my posts of the past decade.

Rather than interesting observations, yes there is a trend where singles are absent any big deal streaks. What's really huge is the fact that when it changes sleeping in one part of the set it sleeps for a good stretch in another part right after it. It's a perfect example of the global effect. You could destroy a casino with this trend if you had the bankroll.

Are there no people that can see the global effect in the chart above?


This is it folks, no fees to be taught. I will disclose everything here, once for all. People go Cuckoo For Cocoa Puffs for the latest mindless system yet finding out what really works leaves them in a state of limbo. Funny how human nature works isn't it?

I never expected a war of beliefs to break out. I keep a huge secret about randomness and tell it openly and it's not even seen as a solution to the quest of the Holy Grail. This is funny. The only way most people here can see is by following a Pied Piper for A Rat People. The only way they will know anything is when it is far too late. If I want to drop the bomb I need to write the app after all.

I have to ask. Are these charts lining up or are they not in code mode?

Look at this to see what I see. There is a very strong global effect occurring in the third set of dozens from the left to the right.

Can you see it?


|       X |    X    |    X    |    X    | -- 9
| X       |       X |       X | X       | -- 6
|       X |       X | X       | X       | -- 7
| X       | X       | X       | X       | -- 1
| X       |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 2
|       X |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 0
| X       |       X | X       |       X | -- 9
|    X    |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 4
| X       |    X    |    X    |    X    | -- 1
|    X    |    X    | X       |       X | -- 4
| X       |       X |       X | X       | -- 6
| X       |       X |       X | X       | -- 6
|-------------------| X       | X       | -- 0
|    X    | X       |       X |       X | -- 9
|    X    |       X |       X | X       | -- 8
| X       | X       | X       | X       | -- 1
| X       |    X    |       X | X       | -- 5
| X       |    X    |    X    |    X    | -- 8
|    X    | X       | X       |       X | -- 3
|       X |    X    | X       |       X | -- 6
|-------------------| X       | X       | -- 0
|       X |    X    |       X | X       | -- 2
|-------------------| X       | X       | -- 0
| X       |       X | X       |       X | -- 9
|    X    |    X    | X       |       X | -- 4
|       X |    X    | X       |       X | -- 5
|       X |       X | X       | X       | -- 7
|    X    | X       |       X |       X | -- 9
|    X    | X       |    X    |    X    | -- 6
|       X |       X | X       |       X | -- 6
|       X |       X | X       | X       | -- 7
| X       |    X    |    X    |    X    | -- 8
| X       |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 2
|       X | X       | X       | X       | -- 8
|       X |    X    | X       |       X | -- 5
| X       | X       |    X    |    X    | -- 7
|    X    |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 4
| X       |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 3
|       X | X       |       X | X       | -- 1
| X       |       X |    X    |    X    | -- 3
| X       | X       |    X    |    X    | -- 7
| X       |    X    |    X    |    X    | -- 1
|       X | X       |       X |       X | -- 4
|    X    |       X |       X | X       | -- 8
|       X | X       | X       | X       | -- 8


Quote from: from100 on August 07, 2016, 05:10:12 PM
Waiting for triggers (virtual bets)?

For years I would walk into a casino and just start betting without looking before I would leap. It's wise to place some virtual bets in your mind before you buy in. I'm going to look back a few posts and re-post a chart that I found in the first 150 spins of my training software.

If you want to follow my training then you are going to have to learn to read my playing charts. The topic here is reading randomness and winning enough to get out of a session with your winnings. You do that almost every time and the mathematics go right out the door.

It's really simple if you allow it to be simple. Try to get to a position where you have won the equivalent of one single bet against any 24 numbers for whatever reason you may have selected those 24 numbers. It could be lose, win win win to equal one win up. It could be win on the first bet tried to equal one win up. That's why I track the effectiveness condition. You can use the characteristics of randomness and you will still have streaks of everything losing. Obviously you need a way to avoid those times. Now somebody here must be smart enough to know or suggest how to avoid a straight down, losing trend.

Many people learn the best and the fastest if they know first off where they are headed.

If I were to go the route of making an app that wins that app would be a set of rules.

So Why not teach as if it were a simple set of rules.

When I taught my ten students, I taught them to look for any characteristic that has repeated 4 times in a row in the last 4 spins.

That's a great way to get in on the big deal streaks but it's also a good way to experience a lot of losses.

My big deal secret of the past two years is to get the a win at the first move more often. You need a win at double your positive progression's starting value. Here is an example: 28 on one twelve and 28 on another twelve numbers. The win will be 28. You now cut that in half to 14 and 14 for a no risk try.

So the secret is that waiting for 4 repeats is a huge mistake. It's best to use probability in your favor. You need to learn how to win after one or two repeats. Now there can be hundreds of threads at this forum discussing just this first move. So have at it experts. I have things to do today. So I will be in and out for a while. Enjoy.

Quote from: Albalaha on August 07, 2016, 05:30:56 AM
If you really want to educate people, be open with your concepts that you think work.
Tracking software, where is that?

Can you try to create a simulator/tracker that can automatically analyze a large set of data as you want us to play?

Is it flat betting?

So this website is infected by a Gestapo of text styling.

I don't care that I need to format all text as size 10. I just lost my response privileges to a style  algorithm.

I'm not joking here, You can't beat randomness unless you can read randomness. So first all of you must see the light. It's time to make the math Nazis see coincidence. If they persist in only seeing nothing then leave them in their ignorance. It's time to move forward. Their arguments will be deleted by me if they project nonsense.

Most of you have no clue where to start.  Start with the recognition of a characteristics of a randomness trend.


Ask away. I will teach you until all of you are wise.


Get Smart Here: download my free to use tracking software.


I hope that others here will help lost travelers here, please.

I don't need the money. My life could be less accomplished but I don't care anymore.

Here is what is going to happen. The Math Nazis and the absolutist faction of the  probability theorists either win this war or they don't.

I will build the app as a proof of concept device. It will be open source. I will answer every question asked of me here as if I were a tutor asking money for it. I'm done being mad at the naysayers.  I'm ready to wreck the opportunity. DEAL WITH IT.

Don't you see it Mike. Conditional situational pragmatism, in the hands of an experienced randomness player, might be a major breakthrough in a convoluted and tired axiom of nothing more than a mathematical, soon to be extinct, LAW of theories.

Quote from: Mike on August 06, 2016, 07:30:01 PM
LOL. I take this as merely forum banter. Nobody can be that deluded.. can they? 

You might like to know what Albert had to say about Roulette before you aggrandize your self.

Quote from: Mike on August 06, 2016, 03:22:42 PM
You're never going to prove the "math nazis" wrong. That's the thing about math; once proved, a theorem can't be "unproved".

Proving you wrong won't be gratifying. Proving Albert Einstein wrong will be.