Quote from: Xander on June 15, 2014, 01:19:25 AM
This is the same thead that ran for a decade on Gamber's Glenn.   The only difference is that it's moldy now.  I think we can file this one away along with the 4Selectra.

As usual, this is a flat out lie. I never openly shared my specific secrets or attempted to answer all questions that are relevant at GG. Here I have. In fact only here have I been completely open and transparent . I'll bet snowman is here, hiding.

Quote from: Mr J on June 15, 2014, 01:17:36 AM
I think it takes balls to start a thread like this, hats off to Gizmo.

It does not mean I agree (keep that in mind), just sayin, to KNOW you will be slammed regardless, I give him credit.

That said, of course any moron knows when a streak is over, HOWEVER, to know before it starts (at the moment of starting)? Hmmm, that's a tough pill to swallow.

Ken

Ken, my entire technique hinges on session effectiveness and the beginning of every streak attempt. Only these critics are never interesting in asking smart questions. If the did I would answer them. But all they want to do is stroke their own egos.

BTW, you can use any method for finding a trend you want. Betting on trends have three types of results. They work very good or perfectly. They work very bad. Or they work kind of both at the same time. My practice software creates charts that I can see very quickly what is happening . Your chart does not do that for me.

Quote from: warrior on June 13, 2014, 10:49:06 PM
The pattern breaks down and you stop, just to re-start and stop again and therefore your bombarded by more chopping, roulette is the hardest to make money with patterns.

I'm not bombed by chop. I only bet when the trend's characteristic is strong or perfect. Did you know that there are typically one stretch of 18 or more spins that sleep for each double street within every 150 spins. That's 110 sleepers in every 150 spins. There must be a way to mine this data for an advantage.

Quote from: warrior on June 13, 2014, 07:44:06 PM
You don't know when the losing streak will start or end.

I know exactly when. The first loss is a signal that the pattern has broken down. That's the perfect time to stop feeding the table. Like I have said before, context matters to me a great deal. I play imperfect repetitions of patterns. I may come right back after a first loss IF THE CONTEXT FOR THE CONTINUING STILL HOLDS TRUE. That just means that the first loss is not always the last bet. But most of the time it is. If you use selective methods you can search for other opportunities. Nobody forces you to keep placing bets.

Quote from: Garnabby on June 13, 2014, 04:49:30 PM

What is the gist of your method?  You remind me of gr8player, who keeps referring us back to hundreds of his repetitively useless posts at the GG.  (Somewhere in there is the "answer", you know.  Lol.)
You can do that w/o giving anything specific away.  On what is the method based? Which branch of math.

in this thread : from the second page:
http://betselection.cc/meta-selection/the-simple-explanation-attacking-trends/msg2678/#msg2678

Quote from: Xander on June 13, 2014, 04:50:00 PM
Come on Gizmo.  Aren't your claims getting a bit wild? [smiley]aes/confused.png[/smiley]

Only a fool sits there feeding a losing streak or any dominance of losing. You have to  lose all the bets of a downturn in order for the house's edge to fulfill itself.

That's you at the door. You need to go down the block where they are handing out brains.

Quote from: Turner on June 13, 2014, 02:43:02 PM
I have studied singles and series from a probability point of view and they follow the same unpredictable varience that ec follows....just IMO

You don't need to predict when, by coincidence that, characteristics will go into a phase of continuing. Prediction is not possible in the near short term. It's irrelevant to attempt it, even from a statistical point of view.

Quote from: Leapyfrog on June 13, 2014, 03:34:39 PM...if you are winning, it is not the selection that is making you win, it is your approach to game and the way you spend your money is what is making you win. That is my humble opinion. And as always I don't expect you to believe me or agree with me. You will get that trot you are talking about even by just following the last even chance.

So how would your method avoid the losing streaks?  My method allows me to stay out of losing streaks.

Carpanta, interesting use of the matrix as a charting method. It proves that charts can reveal characteristics.

Quote from: Turner on June 13, 2014, 02:43:02 PM
I have studied singles and series from a probability point of view and they follow the same unpredictable varience that ec follows. Infact...they are the same.
As pointed out....20 chop is perfectly acceptable in a small sample but single hits will be close to series hits with much larger samples.
I don't see any reason for patterns forming mathematically....just in the mind.
No intentional putdown on the topic owner....just IMO

The point of the global effect is to see if it conforms to an existing context that relates to the most resent set of spins. When it happens, it adds to the possibility of having a strong win streak. Once you start to recognize the phenomenon, you will never be able to go back to not seeing them.

Quote from: warrior on June 13, 2014, 01:07:24 PM

And what happens when it chops s for 20 in a row?

I don't attempt to specialize in choppy stretches. I just try to find characteristics that are continuing. I realize that for the moment that chop is currently continuing. I just don't have a good betting method for it. I know chop will end. Everything has an ending. Everything has a beginning, a middle, and an end.

Before being interrupted I was sharing the existence of the perfect repeating pattern. I consider this the most fringe of rare occurrences. The topic of this thread is about taking advantage of rare events. The old boy scout axiom plays into this, "be prepared". 

I always am searching for these moments while I play my normal game. I wonder if others have such tactics?

Quote from: Mike on June 11, 2014, 04:47:25 PM

Typical. You can never get a straight answer from system advocates. That's because they know that if they give a concrete methodology you can actually test, it will be shown to be a loser. Far better to keep it vague and then no one can say you're wrong because they don't know what you're talking about in the first place.

http://betselection.cc/gizmotron/the-global-effect-what-is-it/  - for those that are interested.

I could not be more pleased that you don't get it. Some people deserve their own self inflicted retribution. Whine all you want. This website is the only place on the internet where I answered all the questions. I have no reason to re-discuss material already published. I have no desire to argue with a troll. Come back when you have done your homework.

Quote from: Mike on June 11, 2014, 09:15:40 AM
Gizmo, where is your example? Your method seems to be this: look at the last few outcomes and if you see a pattern, eg something like R B R B then bet that the pattern continues. So the pattern being alternating red/black I would bet on red next, correct?.

If the bet fails I look for another pattern and bet for it to continue. Is this your method in a nutshell?

Singles in the EC 's are not rare. I won't bet on them unless there is also an existing context, the global effect. - Yes, I know, it's another made up phrase. Too bad you are too lazy to research about context. It's  here at this forum, it's completely given without an expectation of compensation.