I believe you are requesting proof.

I began on these forums by suggesting that trends work for me. All my hints were deliberately cryptic. That was about eight years ago.

I've had years arguing with brilliant gamblers, that themselves also had decades of real playing experience. Two years ago I decided to teach ten students. I learned some very interesting things about attempting to pass on experience.

But something hit me as a very funny idea. Why not actually hand everyone the real working way to beat Roulette. They will reject that too. So far, I think my joke is doing great. So while I write the death nail proof, we'll all have a chuckle. BTW, did you know that I have a reputation for "baloney festivals?" Sometimes I want to get in on all the fun too. But this is without a doubt my greatest creation. I get one last great moment.

Yes this is most definitely fun.

I got these questions on a pm:
" You mentioned that it will take others to tell me your software works. May I ask what you mean by this?"

If I give away the 'proof' software I will not encrypt the source code. You might need someone to explain it to you.

"Will only certain people be allowed to use or view the software and they will confirm that it works?"

Sounds like the least foolish thing to do, don't you think? If I chose to make a point then you can have a look see.

"When do you think your software will be ready?"

Just about the time you have had a good laugh.

"On the forum I only try my best to advance roulette and make it an enjoyable place for people. There is enough sadness in the world. The forum can be a great place for people to let go of their worries and enjoy discussing and thinking about roulette."

Then you should enjoy yourself while many are still interested. Once a proven solution is published very few will frequent these kinds of forums.



Reply to

Quote from: esoito on December 31, 2012, 01:39:49 AM
Gizmotron: "I was kind of hoping that at least all the moderators were past the beginner level."


One might ask if you practise being offensive, or if it just comes naturally.

Take heed: Keep up this sort of behaviour and you will outstay your welcome.

I have some really important work to do. You can try this without me mother. You have been a terrible moderator. Power tripper. You are tripping dude.

sqzbox, thank you for answering all my questions. My goal is to convince you that there is more to detachment than you have explained. You see, the smart player must accept the truth that attempting to follow trends offers no advantage, as you have clearly stated. Hence the need for total detachment from any bet selection process. I'm not talking about rule based or progression but any randomness characteristic. There is no advantage and no prediction offered.

All you have of use is the current nature and characteristic of the effectiveness. Every loss is a signal that you are not in a perfect win scenario. I believe it's useful to attack all winning steaks and to back down from chaos and losing streaks. Have you done much work on this? 

You clearly have no use for trends. This is exactly what you have decided to do without. Perfect patterns and trends occur. While you successfully bet on them the casino is like your own personal ATM machine. That is a fact. I know of no other opportunity gambling that is better than that. All it takes is having a strategy that pays for when it does not work.

AMK  -" I think you would agree that even by your standards your own play cannot be validated to be effective longterm."

The only reason for that conclusion is that I have not proved it yet. The only way to do that is to finish the computer program algorithm that will be indisputable proof. Sorry, but it will take others to tell you it actually works. Mathematicians will go completely insane. Nope, all I have to do is just about kill myself writing it. It will likely contain three hundred thousand lines of code. That's perfect code without a single syntax error. So I don't have to do anything but all the heavy lifting. Right now I'm intrigued by the single number concept of adding one unit to your bets on each win, while you are behind.  BTW, here is a little secret that you can count on. All configurations of bet combinations and/or groupings all equate to the single number bet. In other words Ralph is already done. He just doesn't know it yet.

I guess its time I stop attempting to make anything simple. Ralph, When I created a sim  for testing all the hot numbers, the telemetry showed me something worth researching. So I'm real glad you are doing this research. I learned about randomness by studying hot numbers and guessing ways to select the hottest numbers as they change. So, thanks to you I've had an original / worthy idea. I've not seen any good ones in years. People are so many years behind that it's easy to get tired of looking. Worst of all, if you tell them that this stage of development will only lead them to a dead end experience that they badly need. Well then the happy police come out of the woodwork. I can only imagine that going through this stage, live on the internet, well it must be embarrassing at points. This thread is about the absurdity that hit & run changes the odds. If you think it does then you are only going through a phase.  I'm so glad I don't have to defend these kinds of stages. I was kind of hoping that at least all the moderators were past the beginner level.

Quote from: Juiced91 on December 30, 2012, 11:13:55 PM
Why do all your replies have to come with an arrogance that your above everyone. 6-37= -31. You can say we're all stupid as we don't understand your posts that's cause none of them make sense. Yes you post your so-called "winning" system, but you need to be a species from mars to begin to understand what half your replies mean. We're all equal here.

Wow! I had no idea I was reaching half. Thanks.

There is only one claimer that says he beats Roulette flat betting only. He uses his "educated guess." He says that he dilerbratly avoids extreme variance. He is known as Spike, on this forum.

I'm of a completely different school. I deliberately enjoy it when extreme variance occurs. I bet the minimum during losing streaks and as much as I can during winning streaks.

Sqzbox -" After all, it SEEMS sensible to "follow the trend" which is really just the last decision, or, if you want to be a bit more sophisticated, follow the decision before last which captures a proportion of two types of trend (all the same, or alternating)."

I read your posting at the link referenced. That and what you have written here are refreshing reading to say the least. Have you considered a form of detachment from bet selection, nothing more than a guess, and the effectiveness track? Some people refer to these conditions as win streaks and losing streaks. What about using the bet selection process as a tool to produce favorable periods for the purpose of exploiting them.

I'm also curious what it was about patterns and anti-patterns that gave you the impression that they are worthless or useless? Have you ever exploited a perfect occurring pattern?

Quote from: albalaha on December 30, 2012, 07:17:40 AM
Guys,
          I am no one to stop all these but please think of your standards too. Both of you are merely teasing each other now. Debate has been over way back.

Another mother hen. What's this? You lobbying for moderator too. This thread has a legitimate right to exist. It's about the clarification that hit & run has no capacity to improve the odds and therefore is only wishful thinking, fallacy, and confirmation bias all rolled up into altruistic hype.

Quote from: JohnLegend on December 30, 2012, 06:44:42 AM
Gizmotron, all that you think believe will be turned upside down. Do you really think your tests proved ANYTHING?

I don't flip out, I give my side of the story. Then people who think they have a monopoly on correct thinking and success. Jump in and attack. But you cannot attack monetary success. That's what it will all boil down to.

So the legend continues.

Quote from: albalaha on December 30, 2012, 05:55:24 AM
Now, this is going beyond a healthy debate and admin/global moderators should interfere and stop this.

It was a moderator that demanded I give an "objective" explanation. So I gave it. JL flipped out. That's ok though. We can all go back to holding our breaths.

Now this thread is hijacked.

Just in case you haven't heard, hit and run is absurd.

:

Quote from: JohnLegend on December 30, 2012, 05:33:54 AM
You are no different to anyother detractor Giz. YOU ASSUME you have all the anwsers. Like everyone else is a fool if they don't DO IT YOUR WAY.

There lies true ignorance. The marti IS NEVER GONE. It is the backbone of ALL my methods. Your MISTAKE like many. Is in assuming it is my KEY reason/claim FOR SUCCESS.

NO, The KEY REASONS and ONLY REASONS I will be successful until the day I draw my last breath. Is H.A.R together with a decent BET SELECTION. And SMART MM on the more vunerable methods like PB.

On FIVE, and 7 ON 1 no human factor no MM is required. PLAYED H.A.R they simply WIN. Secure profit. To play them requires the biggest reason this game is still thought of as unbeatable. PATIENCE, PATIENCE AND MORE PATIENCE.
That is lacking in the masses. And it's a key ingredient to success with this game.
Hence why the game will ALWAYS be there for the patient and clever to use for monetary gain.

Quote from: JohnLegend on December 30, 2012, 05:12:59 AM
Three step marti, get over that first.My success has nothing to do with a three-step-marti. there's your biggest mistake right there.

You think how you think and play is the only way to be successful. that's the lesson

Why does everything change when results and challenges confront you? Now the Marti is gone. This tactic is hit and run excuses.

Try all you want to make this my issues. You might want to take notice to the title to this thread.