Dane,

Just giving this whole thing a different perspective. I think we will definitely have hot DSs, we will have cold DSs. It is really hard to differentiate. How about an approach which will take advantage of this.
Do you think it will work. I think with the nature of the DS, unless you would like to play them as ECs, we should play a maximum of one DS and only one DS. Anything more or less, will eventually lead to the downfall.

It is just a different way of looking at ECs. Nothing more nothing less.

Interesting and there is no one solution A lot will depend on what's happening in the table.

Two surgeries and am back. By God's grace have been given another 20-30 days before I can completely vanish and take his company. Keeping spirits high is a challenge, but not really unachievable.

Thanks for all the well wishes folks. Will try to spend some time here, before I take my last sleep!

I am stunned! Thanks a lot for all your well wishes! This is what I will miss.
I will be stationed at Irving, TX. If I find time, might even travel to Okie and Nick! Have a week before I leave!

Thanks people for all the kind words and well wishes! Hope to come back soon!

Gents,

So much to share, but so little time to do.

My daughter has finally convinced me to travel with her to states to do a little bit of much needed overhauling of my body. Eventhough I might be accessing the forum quite infrequently in between my treatments, I don't think I will be able and will have the strength to use it extensively like the way I am doing now.

When I return after 2-3 months, (ofcourse if I return) will continue to get more active. Just wanted to say thank you for the wonderful time and discussions in case we never meet again! PM me or mail me as you always do and will strive to keep in touch.

Au revoir (hope its temporary)!

A friend of you and mine!
GreatGrampa

I got some PMs asking for the method that I used and there is also some confusion in the forum in the post that ATlantis has posted the system as there are multiple versions posted around. As Sam rightly said, play exactly as it is written.

To avoid confusions and lack of examples floating around, I have attached one of my sessions playing this. Again, as Sam rightly said it is Easy Peasy. If you read the excel you will get how it is played. The only thing that I have done differently from what Atlantis has said is making 1u on line and 2u on EC and restricting my winnings to 3u per mini game. Atlantis has suggested 1u on line and 2u on EC with 6u win per mini game.

Atlantis, Sam, I am not sure whether am playing the way you intended this to be played, but this is what is working for me!

I have played 127 sessions so far with a target of +100/-100. 81 in casino and 46 in Bet voyager. I have lost 17 of them, 3 in casino and 14 in Bet voyager. I have used various progressions, but the one suggested by Atlantis is the one that I have used in about 93 games.

Also, those who are interested can read my short notes on concepts that I keep for every system I play, the kind of data I gather for every session that I have played. My daughter has kindly wrote me a datawarehouse database where this all resides and uses cubes to get me reports when I need Very insightful. Am learning it too!

Quote from: BrenoGarcia on June 24, 2013, 02:17:46 PM
GG, in a game lost (-50). Start fresh and go to 2 units in the cyclic progression until how many steps? 2 - 4 - 6 - 8 - 10 ... 20(is 10 steps)? And Stop / Loss for progression with 2 units is  -50 or -100?

10 steps until 20. Stop loss is -50.

Quote from: FLAT_IN_O on June 23, 2013, 07:35:30 PM
It is my place.

You seem to be very rich, owning such a gorgeous place

Will it be wise to play for a repeat? stake is lower  return higher

Sure ignatus.  It is straightforward.  Will post in detail when I get time.

Quote from: Buffalowizard on June 22, 2013, 07:59:20 AM
Yes weddings is right

A repeat is a no bet so you wait for a non repeating line before playing

5 5 no bet
2 6 these are non repeaters
3 1 win on DS 1

Hope this is a little clearer

Confused mate.  There are 3 options possible here. 

Option 1
You play both columns. While playing column 1 you play that line 2 do not appear and playing column 2 you play 6 do not appear.

Option 2
You play only the 2nd column. While playing you play for 6 and 3 not to appear.

Option 3
You play only 2nd column. While playing u play for 3 not to appear.  Which one are you playing.

If you are playing option 3 then you need 5 wins to compensate 1 loss and not 3. If you are playing option 1, then 5,5 is not a loss in your example. 

Quote from: ignatus on June 21, 2013, 09:16:27 PM
If you haven't seen it already, I was inspired by your method. All respect to your thread, just wanted to show you my results playing this:


(my method)


Trigger:Wait for 2 of the same, RO RO, BO BO, RE RE, BE BE
then bet for the opposite 8-10 straight up numbers.

Example: RO RO hits, then bet all BE straight up numbers for the next 3 spins.
IF no hit STOP and wait for a new trigger.Progression: Negative cyclic progression 111222333444...-1 level at hit.




Would be interested in your betselection GG!

First of all, well done on tryignn to create something that suits you. Test, test and test! Only that can make you win. With the kind of progression that you are playing, I would suggest not to chase too long after a trigger. Also, instead of going opposite, have you tried following the wheel. The game will be a bit faster. You just have to find the right progression for this.

Having said both of above, they are quick observations. When I get more time next week, will look into it.

Quote from: Chrisbis on June 21, 2013, 09:04:56 PM
Bolting sectors together?

Yes.  And finales too

You have eagle eyes