For that reason you say, about the slow pace of the bank deducted the value of the chips I decided to play in the downloadable version of the game, which is more stable.

I mean more in the time it takes the ball spinning on roulette before giving a result.

It is desirable that the software of Betvoyager worked as fast as a playtech one.

I tried also with settings.

Is there any way to increase the speed at Betvoyager roulette?

I've tried with Cheat Engine, but has gotten worse. It does not work.


Thanks!

Thank you Grandpa. More clear than the clear water

Sure, it's important not to go beyond a point. The maximum would cover nine streets. From there, after a failure, start again covering the remaining three, maybe not from a one unit, eager to recoup losses that's what I want.

I can't understand your system very well, could you explain it please?


...but it likes promising.

Thanks

This progression, applied to streets can give a fantastic result, but I keep beating around the bush, and I can not fit the pieces.

Hello Chrisbis. Thank you.

I mean we add streets to the previous bet as they spuns, for example:

(24)   bet st 8

(7)     bet st 3,8

(22)   bet st 3,8

(26)   bet st 3,8,9

(18)   bet st 3,6,8,9

(31)   bet st 3,6,8,9,11

etc...

This is the terse reply from your brother of Badajoz:

First of all welcome.

Friend Peter, these questions are asked every year in these forums, the answers are endless and generate very long debate and controversy.

From my humble point of view: there is no mechanical method to beat roulette, methods with fixed and rigid rules. For a method to work, you need luck and intuition. Maybe it's a little sad, but it is.

A greeting

Hello, I have a question for you, i think its not easy to answer:

What tipe of progression did you apply to a game of adding streets as it exits and would hit development (W) failures (L) like this:
LLLLLLWLLWLWLWWLWWWLWWWWW?

Thanks

Quote from: GreatGrampa on June 15, 2013, 02:24:31 PM
this can be made more effective and long drawdowns can be voided if you use 2 instead of one. sometimes when the 2 merge on a hot streak, u can pretty much end your play fr the day

Grandpa, two units o a win or two adjacents streets???

Quote from: TwoCatSam on June 14, 2013, 01:02:24 PM
Bro, you lost me on that 2.7%.  I only know of a 5% rake against the banker winning.  Player pays $1 and banker pays $.95.

What is this 2.7%??

Samster

https://www.betvoyager.com/games/other/punto-banco/10471678719869/

Hello

Betvoyager offer the game Punto Banco without house edge.

In this game I'm testing a series of very simple mathematical strategies in relation to the 2.7% that is added or removed from the bet on punto and banco espectively. I see that this is impossible to have a modicum of success.

Can you think of you any idea about it? Is eventually possible to obtain some kind of positive result to the long run? I understand they are very difficult questions to answer.

Thank you.

In this case it would always raise the stakes, with steps, never diminish, but so slowly and with less danger that a progression type +1 each W.

Slow progression but positive, then our bets not grow to infinity.

It is also a matter of taste or preference. This progression is the one I like, with which I feel most comfortable playing.

Hi friends, I'll explain it only slightly which is my favorite progression. Surely this has a name, but I donot know what is. That is why I call it "Progression to the first win".

Let's see. We assume that we're playing a simple chance, for example, although it would for any type of bet.

If we make a record of earnings (W) and losses (L), we would have for example the following:

LLLWLLLWWWWWLWLLLLWWWWLLWLWLLWWWWWLWWWLLWLLLLW

Increasing our progression would apply every time a unit in this development see Figure "LW" keeping the bet in the other cases.

That is, we have:

LLLWLLLWWWWWLWLLLLWWWWLLWLWLLWWWWWLWWWLLWLLLLW

We start betting one unit and would add another each time after one or more losses shown a profit. Only in that case and not another. In our example we would end up betting 10 units of this:

1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,4,4 ..................... .10

It is therefore a positive progression that I like to apply, being in my opinion quite smooth.

[attachimg=1].....................................