ok   

About  my example bad run   .....LLLLLW(TR)L1L2L3W(TR)L1L2 WIN L1L2L3 W(TR)L1L2L3 W(TR) L1L2L3.....ETC...
I have found the solution few years back,  it s  the betselection  and  i have many sessions without
even seen 3 Ls in row ( L1L2L3) and others  with only few L3 with no power to damage  the sessions.
Not tested long run(no skills) , tested  before play around 30 000 spins, then after play more than
20 000 spins still ok.

One question,
what is your base unit size .....0,01 ?  (online) . If so you have a 30.000 units bankroll, easy to not lose that .
If not , then good for you, go make some millions.

None can predict what s next, and none progression  (including your) , betselection, MM,  can survive to the
very long run ( x xxx xxx) .

**You can never predict what you are going to lose in a session. You can only limit your bankroll.**

Not predict but , i know i will not lose more than my stop lose, and with the LW s strategys i do cut many
losses, if i don t use it  then many sessions would be much  worst.

See chart, if i play this session with or without  LWs( enter / exit points) it s the same final result?
Even if i lose the sesssion , it s limited lose.     So is not useless.
Play what is temporaly hot (keep update) , try avoid losses, use moderate progressions, that is
my way.

green .....enter point
black......exit point

LLLLWLLLWLLLLLLWLLWLLLWLLLLWLLLLLW

Yes like i said that can hit sometimes , for that i use stop lose.
It all about lost sessions Vs  won sessions, and meanwhile  the
W sessions beats the losing ones that is what really matter.
And some bet selections are little better than others (like RB, OE ,HL)
if the base is on human factor (dealer).

Hi Albalaha, you remember my LW s strategys to avoid  sometimes
long  Ls  streaks......Still ok for me combined with good MM, up when win
and only if necesary,and reduce bets  when start to go down.
Must cut losses when possible , in special when long Ls streak.



In this your session i used  Levels each have  3 steps,
and   W  or L3 stop, wait virtual W (only after L3)
Even if i can t win every and each session,  many
sessions winners.
One example of possible bad  run:    W(TR) is  trigger

LLLLLW(TR)L1L2L3W(TR)L1L2 WIN L1L2L3 W(TR)L1L2L3 W(TR) L1L2L3.....ETC...
the losses  would be many times at the first Level(s) so no  big damage.


Now your session,

L
L
W  trigger(tr)
L1
L2
L3  stop
L
W   tr
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
L2
L3  stop
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W  tr
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
L3  stop
L
W  tr
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
L3   stop
L
W  tr
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
L2
L3   stop
L
W  tr
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
L2
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win
L1
Win

Hi Abalaha,
Let s say that we have Always this LWs as trigger...

LLWWLLWWLLWW
or
LWLWLWLWLWLW

Now we look at same LW but use groups 1 and 2 (or A and B)

112211221122
or
121212121212

Don t you think that the Change it s close ?
Random Vs Order .....random can t stay to much in order and
the change will come.

Now just  example how i try to create  that triggers:

Splits / group

7            1
12          1 
8            2
13          2
7            1
2            1
13          2
6            2
10          1
14          1
8            2
3            2 bet for change
-------------------------------------
2            1           L1
9            1new     L2
16          2new     L3
13          2           L4
8            2           W

the groups grows(and we lose) when new split hit,
also lose when splits repeat in same pattern, but
the change is very close most of the times.

Btw...i prefer streets, lines, quads

Yes i am and will be  very ordered  at *subatomic level*,
pure energy.     

**Magician** ,

**  Exergy & Entropy. ** and  great delusions.....and whatever great words...

I love my delusion about Patterns and Order, they give me  enough info to
take the right decision most of the times when i bet . Can be done flat bet
or with possitve progression (chart s flat bet).


This quote shows that order is  part of math.
But there is much more about this ...math/patterns/order....
search yourself.

Quote:

**
Order theory is a branch of mathematics which investigates the intuitive notion of order using binary relations. It provides a formal framework for describing statements such as "this is less than that" or "this precedes that". This article introduces the field and provides basic definitions. A list of order-theoretic terms can be found in the order theory glossary.
Orders are everywhere in mathematics and related fields like computer science. The first order often discussed in primary school is the standard order on the natural numbers e.g. "2 is less than 3", "10 is greater than 5", or "Does Tom have fewer cookies than Sally?". This intuitive concept can be extended to orders on other sets of numbers, such as the integers and the reals. The idea of being greater than or less than another number is one of the basic intuitions of number systems (compare with numeral systems) in general (although one usually is also interested in the actual difference of two numbers, which is not given by the order). Other familiar examples of orderings are the alphabetical order of words in a dictionary and the genealogical property of lineal descent within a group of people.

The notion of order is very general, extending beyond contexts that have an immediate, intuitive feel of sequence or relative quantity. In other contexts orders may capture notions of containment or specialization. Abstractly, this type of order amounts to the subset relation, e.g., "Pediatricians are physicians," and "Circles are merely special-case ellipses."

Some orders, like "less-than" on the natural numbers and alphabetical order on words, have a special property: each element can be compared to any other element, i.e. it is smaller (earlier) than, larger (later) than, or identical to. However, many other orders do not. Consider for example the subset order on a collection of sets: though the set of birds and the set of dogs are both subsets of the set of animals, neither the birds nor the dogs constitutes a subset of the other. Those orders like the "subset-of" relation for which there exist incomparable elements are called partial orders; orders for which every pair of elements is comparable are total orders.

Order theory captures the intuition of orders that arises from such examples in a general setting. This is achieved by specifying properties that a relation ≤ must have to be a mathematical order. This more abstract approach makes much sense, because one can derive numerous theorems in the general setting, without focusing on the details of any particular order. These insights can then be readily transferred to many less abstract applications.

Driven by the wide practical usage of orders, numerous special kinds of ordered sets have been defined, some of which have grown into mathematical fields of their own. In addition, order theory does not restrict itself to the various classes of ordering relations, but also considers appropriate functions between them. A simple example of an order theoretic property for functions comes from analysis where monotone functions are frequently found.
Partially ordered sets[edit]
Orders are special binary relations. Suppose that P is a set and that ≤ is a relation on P. Then ≤ is a partial order if it is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, i.e., for all a, b and c in P, we have that:

a ≤ a (reflexivity)
if a ≤ b and b ≤ a then a = b (antisymmetry)
if a ≤ b and b ≤ c then a ≤ c (transitivity).
A set with a partial order on it is called a partially ordered set, poset, or just an ordered set if the intended meaning is clear. By checking these properties, one immediately sees that the well-known orders on natural numbers, integers, rational numbers and reals are all orders in the above sense. However, they have the additional property of being total, i.e., for all a and b in P, we have that:

a ≤ b or b ≤ a (connex property).
These orders can also be called linear orders or chains. While many classical orders are linear, the subset order on sets provides an example where this is not the case. Another example is given by the divisibility (or "is-a-factor-of") relation "|". For two natural numbers n and m, we write n|m if n divides m without remainder. One easily sees that this yields a partial order. The identity relation = on any set is also a partial order in which every two distinct elements are incomparable. It is also the only relation that is both a partial order and an equivalence relation. Many advanced properties of posets are interesting mainly for non-linear orders.

And.....so on............ ***

I know this will sound weird for some , but ... Order kill random.

This is what random give us ....random,

No /      R/B

3           R
23         B
17         B
33         B
3           R
8           B
21         R
24         B
6           B
34         R
19         R
33         B
4           B
9           R
15         B
14         R
31         B
10         B
4           B
18         R

Now same numbers but maybe doesn t look
so random anymore....

No /      Group(singles/chops)

3           1
23         2
17         1
33         2
3           1
8           2
21         1
24         2
6           1
34         2
19         1
33         2
4           1
9           2
15         1
14         2
31         1
10         2
4           1
18         2

Yes , still can hit same order for few spins (and new numbers will be
ordered in the same pattern/order) but....
The Change is close, groups will change position most
of the time.

Hi Dr. Mabuse ,
No , I am living in Spain , but not spanish  and
not from Austria , some neighbor.....

In that example i posted we can attack after the 123.....
the last 2 groups to repeat, but too many numbers to bet.
You saw that in this pattern 123123123123 we have hit only certain
position between same group ,so  positions 3,6,9. 
  When i say bet last two groups that mean that we bet for
positions 1 and 2 (the most important ones).
  Then i choose to bet only one (pos 1 or pos 2) this way bet
only one *dozen*, not long attack only for few spins and possitive
progression.

** but avoiding extreme variance in the.....PROGRESSION!!! **

then you must use ,like i told you time ago , Lw strategys to
avoid  bad runs.  This Lw strategys will help you only sometimes
but better something that nothing.

Why stuck into the classic dozens ?
Any 12 numbers groups are dozen.
Create a losing sequence and you will have
better chances to win in the next spins.

Ex:

12  different numbers in row

3,34,19,23,5,11,33,22,4,36,9,16

now add any two numbers  to each of that numbers and we have
3 dozens, and put them into this order 123123123123

will this sequence 123.....still hit ? or the *dozens* will
change position...

Nick,
Could you give us an example how
to play the combination of doublets with
triplets.

And the other way the chops way seems to be
a good way to play.
1. No bet
2. Bet oposite spin 1
3. Bet oposite spin 2
1. No bet
2. Bet oposite spin 1
3. Bet oposite spin 2
Still good results with this one?

Thanks

I was talking about Triplets also, the eventual use of the LWs strategy
and maybe possitive progression.

Hi Nick,
In your Triplets simulations did you noticed long bad runs like ? :
(each  1.  is the no bet from your example)

1.  R bet R
2.  B  L1, bet B
3.  R  L2
1.  R   bet R
2.  B  L1, bet B
3.  R  L2
1.  B  bet B
2.  R  L1, bet R
3.  B  L2
....so on....
If yes (long bad run of many consecutive L2) then maybe
is good to  stop at the second  L2, wait one wirtual W and
start again for real. Just curious if make any difference in
long run.
Also, did you try your bet with possitive progression?
Levels :
1,2 /  3,6 /  10,20 /  30,60 /  100, 200 /  300,600 (optional this last level)
Rise level after W session , reset at new high.
Down one level after L2. After twice in row L2 i would stop and wait
virtual W, then bet again for real.


Same when bet the chop bet RBRBRBR.....
i supose sometimes hit some long(or semi long) bad runs,
and try to avoid them with the Lw strategy.