Ralph,
           It is one of the most interesting thing that I can see here in this forum. Can you please clarify, how do you play it actually? If possible, attach even the shortest session excel sheet.

1 unit on 0-1-2-3                                                                                  (corner, pays 1 unit profit)
2 units on 31-32-33-34-35-36                                                               (double street, pays 4 units profit)
1 unit on each of the following 5 splits: 8-11, 13-14, 15-18, 17-20, 27-30  (each split gives profit of 10 units)


It means, we can play this trick, in a variety of ways. We are basically covering 20 numbers with different bets.

Quote

There are some good flat betting system, but none which match your specification (obviously).

blunt but the most honest answer.

No. I think it was something else. In that research it was shown as to what gaps repeaters occur most. It was at 9th to 12th attempt, I think. How can no repeater come at 34th step in a million trials and I am talking of repeat of a single number and not the EC.

Can you show the link?

Hey Friends,
      Long back there was a research done upon the occurance of repeaters. It was regarding which position has more chance to repeat, for example a number that has hit last, before last ............36th
                       I think it was done upon a million spins and it was observed that numbers that are at the distance of 9th to 13th repeat most.
      Can someone spot that research from rouletteforum.cc?

which system is there in the test bot now?

great job. cheers.

Without understanding how random works you don't have
a chance of beating roulette. If you don't learn how to
think like random thinks, it will never let you tame it.

  If you have understood randmoness properly why don't you tell your way of beating/taming it? Empty preachings do not impress. 

I am not accusing you Gizmo or spike but rather I supported  your contentions in those threads, that u can check too. I just mean to say, let's avoid this topic and work upon something else positive. I can very conclusively say that there is no system ever posted in any forum  that can pass a million spins test, with winning even a single chip. PB is just another system. It is useless to analyse it so deep. Let others play it.
            If you analyse any system written over here or in any other forum with the depth that you did with PB, all will have same fate.

Can you suggest anything that can win more and lose less, in long run? If not, u have got no right to criticize a system so much.

I ask rather request Spike and Gizmo to stop bashing someone, whether they like something or not. Half the forum is into debating PB. Worst thing is, most of them is going negative. I personally feel that PB is nothing better than martingale but it is OK if others are willing to play that way.
            Live and let others live too.

Hey Gizmo,
        Do not overemphasize this topic. You have already said so many things about it. Has PB become a subject of research? Shouldn't we focus our attention towards other constructive things than keep on debating over PB.

Can you mention one method (of yours or of anybody else) that fits all these teachings?

So you should expect to lose a game, on average, once in every 7.4 games.

May I take it as we are going to win 7 units (or even more), prior to losing 7 units (in three steps of marty), averagely?

Quote from: MarignyGrilleau on November 28, 2012, 09:36:45 PM
So, When the casino closes and dealers are playing around practicing and trying to hit zero 3 times in a row, they are messing "the random stream"?
And next time i go and play, of course, i catch the random stream at point D instead of the expected point X.
It messes my bets and i loose.

Are you sure that anything like this actually happens?