Hi AsymBacGuy--another excellent post. I agree 100%(Especially the last sentence in bold below).
Asym above in post#1203:
"...The best #1 example not needing any study is the B>P math propensity (which of course doesn't erase/invert nothing), so B bets are better than P bets.
Unfortunately, in reality B bets are "less worse" than P bets and sometimes that's not even true (no commission tables with B being payed half when winning by a 6).
Trying to forecast a more likely B apparition than expected based upon precedent patterns is a worthless effort. Verified one million of times.
The B propensity is mostly based upon the B4 and B5 initial points meeting a P drawing hand and those situations aren't going to come out so frequently. Meaning that the majority of B bets are just a waste of money (even though less money is wasted than at P bets).
Therefore if some patterns are long term more likely than others and capable to erase/invert the HE, they must also incorporate P hands.
..."
Continued Success,
Asym above in post#1203:
"...The best #1 example not needing any study is the B>P math propensity (which of course doesn't erase/invert nothing), so B bets are better than P bets.
Unfortunately, in reality B bets are "less worse" than P bets and sometimes that's not even true (no commission tables with B being payed half when winning by a 6).
Trying to forecast a more likely B apparition than expected based upon precedent patterns is a worthless effort. Verified one million of times.
The B propensity is mostly based upon the B4 and B5 initial points meeting a P drawing hand and those situations aren't going to come out so frequently. Meaning that the majority of B bets are just a waste of money (even though less money is wasted than at P bets).
Therefore if some patterns are long term more likely than others and capable to erase/invert the HE, they must also incorporate P hands.
..."
Continued Success,