What unit values do you use for your regression bet?
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#17
General Discussion / Re: The JohnLegend challenge
March 05, 2013, 10:28:30 PM
John Legend, my opinion is that you would take the next step reformulating your ways of attacking the game. By now it is obvious something is not working well, i mean you lost every public challenge until today, other than your closed results.
So, in the sake of evolving upwards, study a bit more on the game, and come up with something slightly better or safer. Don't get me wrong, your persistence can turn into something more than entertainment.
Cheers
So, in the sake of evolving upwards, study a bit more on the game, and come up with something slightly better or safer. Don't get me wrong, your persistence can turn into something more than entertainment.
Cheers
#18
General Discussion / Re: Entry points
March 03, 2013, 09:23:39 PMQuote from: Sputnik on March 03, 2013, 07:14:56 PM
So clustering series have a bias ?
I read about some math experts who explore the law of series and come to the conclusion that clustering series where slight more common.
So you have three possibility's, only three existing states, 1 in 3 with no other possibility's.
And you say that FTL has a slight higher strike ratio ...
Then Spike and others would be correct when they state that you be better of following the wheel.
Now why do you say it is a flaw when you have 1 in 3 - that is not a flaw - that is what it is.
But that the distribution clustering into 1 in 3 show a bias towards FTL is just that, slight more common and also not be a flaw.
So the conclusion on developing a march is to aim for FLT and hovering state or FTL and series of singles and not hovering state and series of singles.
That is the best way to explore it. As per thousands of sessions i tested before pen and paper.
"...aim for FLT and hovering state or FTL and series of singles and not hovering state and series of singles."
Basics is that one should aim for series always.
The "bias" comes from the way we identify the states.
Series of singles
11 2 1 22 ends in a series
Hovering
(and here is the trick)
11 2 11 -- one hovering state also ends in a series
11 2 11 2 11 -- two hovering states, ends in a series ...
We often name hovering state as "Isolated Single"
It should be also "Isolated Series"
2 11 2 11 2 1 2- so here we would have two isolated series but only one isolated single followed by one series of singles (that did not end yet).
*****************************************************************************
Even if we change the way we identify the hovering state to be = Isolated Singles + Isolated Series
we can not solve the discrepancy towards series of singles.
One other common flaw when someone starts to count states in a binomial distribution (markow chains) is in small detail: - is that we count ONE series of singles despite its length but do not do so regarding series of series. at the 3rd series in a row we count another series of series state. Causing the count to be much bigger.
The strategy would remain the same and it does not matter, as there is clear bias towards series of series??
Does the distribution of this states have the same frequency as 12 numbers???
Thanks for this discussion even if it went a bit off-topc
Cheers
#19
General Discussion / Re: Entry points
March 03, 2013, 03:54:12 PM
@Ralph -There is no std of 3 or 4 on those screenshots. but i get what you mean.
@Sputnik - What about all other positions?
@Razor - "a fixing deviation of a previous deviation", [/size]it does not matter as the measurement is independent for every window of events.
@Sputnik - What about all other positions?
@Razor - "a fixing deviation of a previous deviation", [/size]it does not matter as the measurement is independent for every window of events.
#20
Creativity Adventures / Re: Regression & Up & Pull
March 03, 2013, 01:38:34 AM
NICE STUFF. The most decent stuff here this year i have to say.
Looking forward for your results.
Cheers
Looking forward for your results.
Cheers
#21
General Discussion / Entry points
March 03, 2013, 12:20:07 AM
Suppose one would only interact with the game whenever a certain position (Even Chance, Dozen, Column, Double Street, Street, Split, Straight) reaches 4 Standard Deviations.
Would the fluctuation be the same as with any random entry point?
Would the fluctuation be the same as with any random entry point?
#22
Mixed / Re: My query for all money management experts
February 21, 2013, 01:51:56 PMQuote from: MarignyGrilleau on February 20, 2013, 08:31:22 PM
Is there any strategy or solution that you openly shared here?
I am not albertojonas...
#23
Mixed / Re: My query for all money management experts
February 20, 2013, 08:31:22 PM
Is there any strategy or solution that you openly shared here?
#24
Math & Statistics / Re: Long runs on EC.
February 20, 2013, 01:45:07 AMQuote from: Ralph on February 17, 2013, 01:52:34 PM
Knowing we can expect about 7 in a run in 200 spins It should be possible to make some use of that knowledge. Seven run can a Martingale easy fix, but nothing says it can't be several more, and then the loss is as it use to be when a negative progression bust, the bankroll is wiped out.
In fact it is more likely to be more than less. The distribution of the longest run is a logarithmic histogram.
It is interesting and yet this thread seems to old only a few views.
Cheers
#25
Math & Statistics / Re: Long runs on EC.
February 18, 2013, 07:47:31 AM
it is around 95% likely to have a run between 5-11 in 200 spins.
From my experience parlay is very effective..
From my experience parlay is very effective..
#26
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Can regression making losing system become winning systems ?
February 10, 2013, 10:30:18 PM
i see and i get it. So You end a session when you hit LLL. Cool.
#27
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Masse Egale
February 10, 2013, 03:32:43 PMQuote from: Ralph on January 16, 2013, 11:46:57 AM
Winning one unit a session on an EC flat betting, is to bet until 1 plus, is there other ways?. It is to find the moment to start.
No less...
#28
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Can regression making losing system become winning systems ?
February 10, 2013, 03:31:10 PM
It does not change fluctuation. Unless we can find a "better" entry point.
Cheers
Cheers
#29
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Can regression making losing system become winning systems ?
February 10, 2013, 03:29:59 PM
And here starting with one unit:
WL | Balance | ||||
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWL | 1 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 1 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 2 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LWL | 3 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 4 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WLW | 5 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WLL | 6 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 7 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 8 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LWW | 9 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 10 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 11 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWL | 12 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 13 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 7 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 8 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 9 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | WLW | 10 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LLW | 10 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 10 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 11 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 11 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 11 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | WWL | 12 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 13 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | LWL | 14 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWL | 15 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 9 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 9 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 10 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWW | 11 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 11 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 11 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 11 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLL | 12 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWW | 13 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 14 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 15 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 16 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 16 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 16 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 17 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 18 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 18 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 19 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 19 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | 13 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | 7 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 8 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 9 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 10 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 11 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 11 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLL | 12 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WLW | 13 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 7 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LWW | 8 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 9 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 10 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWW | 11 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 12 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 12 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWW | 13 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLL | 7 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLL | 1 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWW | 2 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 3 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WWL | 4 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | -2 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | WLL | -1 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWW | 0 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 0 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWW | 1 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WWW | 2 |
#30
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Can regression making losing system become winning systems ?
February 10, 2013, 03:26:23 PM
It seems to me that if you do not hit the first ten units profit the result would be the same as playing starting from 1 unit in the beginning.
Here is random.org from today.EC's.
Here is random.org from today.EC's.
WL | Balance | ||||
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWL | 10 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 10 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 11 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LWL | 12 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 13 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WLW | 14 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WLL | 15 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 16 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 17 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LWW | 18 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 19 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 20 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWL | 21 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 22 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 16 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 17 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 18 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | WLW | 19 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LLW | 19 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 19 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 20 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 20 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 20 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | WWL | 21 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 22 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | LWL | 23 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWL | 24 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 18 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 18 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | LWL | 19 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWW | 20 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 20 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 20 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 20 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLL | 21 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWW | 22 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 23 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 24 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WWL | 25 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 25 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 25 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWL | 26 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 27 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 27 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 28 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 28 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | 22 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | 16 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 17 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 18 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 19 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | WLL | 20 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLW | 20 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLL | 21 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WLW | 22 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | LLL | 16 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LWW | 17 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WWW | 18 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 19 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | LWW | 20 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 21 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | LLW | 21 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LWW | 22 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLL | 16 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | LLL | 10 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWW | 11 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WLW | 12 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | WWL | 13 |
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | LLL | 7 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | WLL | 8 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | WWW | 9 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | LLW | 9 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | LWW | 10 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | WWW | 11 |