Sir,
labby is just another marthy, which instead of one hit, disperse to as many win preset.
and sadly needs hundreds of chips to win only one unit. thus unplayable in in bm.

and outrageously,
me,
like you and
others who claims having hg,
simply
just can't post our hg here...
lest casino close shop!
for those interested,
just keep thinking hard,
labby could only win with 33%+1win...
then the eureka, aha!..moment will knock.

Sir,
I not asking how your method.
I only want to argue with the chart point of view.

Your chart show promising slow upward line
with two very horrible drawdown.

If we study the chart, and draw a line parallelism
to the upward line, like the stock tracking method,
then, with your whatever approach, if you stop real betting when the profit line cross below the  parallel line, and resume betting when the profit line cross above the parallel line, then you could avoid horrible drawdown....( i assumed that you bet every spin, of course) ...but even  if you applied many mini stop,
that charting strategy will be your hg...i think

About the modified labby, i can't believe, you yet understand how , only30hit/100, won with labby...
if you show me any permutation with only 30hit/100spins, i can show you how math could close, even its not 33%+1hit, think hard, and you find the answer, only sadly the staking will too high for bm casino.

if you 100%sure,
bac's player ,
never less then 29/100,

then , the simple modified labby ,
could close everytime.
what you waiting ,
and searching for then?

another Albalaha's zumma,
American roulette, worst ever found,no3.
hit only 329/15000spins.
then hp.johnny will bet,
329*35payout=11514zero plus a single 1,
when 329th win hit, will produce some profit, I think...
but i think i already heard someone shouting..
FOOLLLLL.

since we want to avoid extreme variance,
and take advantage of rtm,
then we need to bet very long spin,
(as in Albalaha research)..of zumma,
lets ASSUME that worst ever EC,
is only 387hit/1000,
then we need a progression to squeeze,
at least 1u, in only 387hit/1000.
in theory, apart from
horrible staking, and table limit, labby must close,
in 33%,+1win
thus 387-330=57surlpus....
in hp.johnson,
we need 387*2=773zero and a single 1.
when the 387th win hit,
we have +1profit.
but of course, people will screams FOOL,
to bet labby and hp.johnny.

my 1cent.
But since all my previous view, being
laughed as naive and fallacy,
I will just argue,
as *academic theory* only.

for the record, worst ever recorded EC,
is still 69hit/200,
that beatable with labby,
as labby only need
33%+1win to win 1unit.

now (with due respect)
Albalaha, try to push the limit ,
to 60/200...
that's,
unbeatable with conventional labby, but
beatable with modified labby.

Albalaha also found that,
(but only few hundreds thousands zumma's hands)
that the worst WAS 30hit/100.
but he argued that the
worst may less than 30/100,
lurking somewhere in the
zumma's, not yet found by anyone.

but 30hit/100 can
easily beaten with modified labby, albeit, hundreds of chips, which impossible in bm.
Now, if Albalaha could search the millions of zumma's, and (very sure, 100% confirm)
if there never less than 15player/50hands,..30%...
then could easily won with modified labby,( though less then needed 33%). and need less chips compare to 100 or 200 hands...that run into thousands of chips!
few people already know how to beat with modified labby, but,
of course keep their mouths tightly shut, else casino change rules!

Albalaha found that, the worst
ever recorded in EC, =only 30win
in 100bet,
and we all knew labby could only win
with at leastg 33%+1win.

Thus, apart from the deadly marthy
at the very last unemerging win, and huge br

we could, for academic understanding.
win even only 30w/100bet...
How, by manipulating the virtual labby
betting.

presume every
next 100bet has only 30hit
wait for long string of losses,
eg.
9row of losses,
or
only 1w in 11bet,
or only 2w in say, 13bet,
or only 3w, in 15bet,
then we could trick the virtual
labby, it has 34win to close!!!

how, by assuming the previous four
losses as a win, in the labby progression,
then...there be at least 30hit, as deduce
by Albalaha's 30/100!
then the labby must closed,
when worst ever 30win materialise before
or at the 100th spin or bet!

if we bet baccarat,
applying previous
last ten dominance,
then if a streak of ten banker,
followed by streak of player,
we be dead meat,
thus we stop betting,
when hitting
four continuous losses.

What if we see five b and five p ?
we may bet the previous, or stop bet.

A dozen, could also sleep,
may only hit 19/100spins.

Thus,
if a dozen asleep, then the other
two become dominance,
and with this logic, we may bet the
previous majority,
to try to hit a stable result,
within math expectation.

How?
by using
1) matrix.
2)random vs random.

we see that
result always within math,
which could be won, by betting
long mild progression.

we do not try to hit an edge,
nor positive variance,

we just want to hit
STABLE WITHIN MATH RESULT

Quote from: Albalaha on September 13, 2019, 06:34:04 AM
Worst of virtuoid first 51,000 hands(ties removed) for Player bet

30/100:

B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
P
P
P
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
P
P
P
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
P
B
P
B
B
P
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
P
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
P
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
P
B
P
P
P
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
P
P
P
B
P
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
P
B
P
P
B
P
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
P
P

Hi Albalaha,
Sir,
the EC could hit ,
only,
30 win, in 100spins...
apart from math 50%,

thus by simple logic,
to avoid hell,
as
expound by many,

if in next 100hand,
player hit only 30,
then

*Follow the Last Majority*,

may at least, prevent us to
face the hell.
(the mm is another topic,
as we intend to
avoid the hell,
though together with,
the strategy of,
"stop bet, after,
four losses",
as expounded by you,
to avoid long losses.)

If the next 100,
player banker is 50/50,
then follow last majority ,
will not cause us to face hell too...

The main PURPOSE,
is to avoid the 30/100 hell,
and to have a STABLE ,
as close possible,
within math results.

The majority may,
the last 4,5,6,7,8,9,or ten.

if the last ten hand, there were ,
say, 8 player, and 2 banker,
then the logic, instruct us,
to bet player...
if we hit straight four losses,
we stop,
till the result stabilise.

We may try this
with your previous samples ,
only 30hit in 100, we will see,
we keep hitting winnings

Sir,
I could not disagree anymore...
you are absolutely right.
(You already posses a hg.)

I rest my case and forever grateful to you.
You are second to none in gambling knowledge!

by the way...what the worst ever known dz/100?
Thanks.

Sir,
how about single dozen.
What the worst dz in 100spins.
Thanks

since both are less than 33.34% hit...

.then labby can't close. and the staking will snowballing to unbearable high.

with possibility of hit lower than 33.34...
no wonder
labby being labeled as a failure.

Thank u Sputnik for your unique interesting ideas.
Appreciate them.
need more time to understand your way.
please tell more as it is interesting.
and how about your progression?
thanks.