Victor. - unfortunately this assumes that you will win eventually and what to do with the winning money. I wish I win with my methods.
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#2
Math & Statistics / Re: Help me understand RB series correctly for a system
June 05, 2014, 09:47:20 AMQuote from: wannawin on June 02, 2014, 08:35:50 PMNot really. I will try explaining why.
not 4 in 4 spins but after every spin recent patterns of four are evaluated so I must consider all possibilities. Right?
For a series of 4 to be labeled a sleeper I must consider 16 spins monitoring for the full 16 combinations that can go in each of the sets.
Am I doing the calculations right so far for continuous play? A pattern of four should be called sleeper only if it goes over 16 spins without showing.
For example lets say a sequence RRBB BBRR RBBR. Now if you are planning to base your play on probabilities of patterns occuring and not occuring, you cannot overlap them. The moment you overlap them it becomes a continous set of occurences and is as good as randomly selecting a pattern as a sleeper.
One way you could improve on playign every spin is consider these are four different tracks of spins. So the above sequence will be read as
First track - RRBB BBRR RBBR
Second track - RBBB BRRR BBR
third track - BBBB RRRB BR
Fourth track - BBBR RRBB R
This way you could still play every spin without impacting the probability of patterns that we spoke about.
#3
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
February 04, 2014, 03:18:10 PMQuote from: Albalaha on February 04, 2014, 10:42:09 AMYes Albalaha. it is in negative. You are right. Satisfied?
I WILL POST THE RESULTS IN A SEPARATE TOPIC. Enough drama done, so far from 26k wins to 4k while it is actually, in negative.
#4
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
February 04, 2014, 10:33:07 AMQuote from: Albalaha on February 04, 2014, 02:16:21 AMI dint delete any of your posts.
You can't hide the truth by deleting my posts. Stef will confirm your failure soon. I know that it was done just to provoke me to give my HG.
I confirmed to you that i have nothing to do with zumma and number 3 and any of the numbers. I didn't beat any of them.
Yes, it was done just to provoke you to give out your HG.
Now?
#5
General Discussion / Re: Any takers for this challenge
February 03, 2014, 01:27:37 PMQuote from: Albalaha on February 03, 2014, 01:21:13 PMWhy is every other discussion of yours pointing back to me albalaha. Is it because I claimed that I beat the challenge that you posted.
I do not demand anything from anybody. Pockets claimed to do this in all numbers alike and even posted his method with hypothetical winnings (his claim shifted from winning more than 26k chips to 4k chips on number 3), he asked me to provide W/L of all zumma numbers. Now he dare not put here how he worked out the end figures. Please do not talk of useful contributions because you have nothing to do with that. Instead of getting frustrated about not getting my system or that of other claimants, focus on what you do have here.
OK. HERE YOU GO. I HAVE NO BUSINESS WITH YOU AND YOUR ZUMMA NUMBERS. I NEVER BEAT YOUR NUMBER 3. I NEVER BEAT ALL THE NUMBERS IN YOUR CHALLENGE. HOPE THAT SATISFIES YOUR EGO.
NOW I WARN YOU NOT TO BRING ME INTO EVERY QUESTION ASKED TO YOU. ANSWER THEM DIRECTLY. IF YOU can't, NOW THAT I HAVE SAID MY CLAIM IS WRONG, GET LOST FROM THIS FORUM AS YOU PROMISED. BE A MAN OF YOUR WORDS. I AM GETTING SICK AND TIRED OF YOUR RANTS HERE. MY LAST POST ON ANY DISCUSSION INVOLVING ALBALAHA. AND MIND YOU, AM BEING VERY POLITE IN WRITING THE ABOVE.
#6
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
February 03, 2014, 01:19:35 PMQuote from: Albalaha on February 03, 2014, 12:58:31 PMI can't help it. If someone doesn't understand they can ask me. TCS asked. I have clarified to him.
Now, this is what we call shying away after shouting. The method that you posted (and later tweaked) is not clear to TCS and Stef too and many more.
If many more ask I can clarify to them. I will clarify to everyone WHO I FEEL is open enough.
A bent tail of a dog, can be straightened only temporarily. I realized after reading through your posts for the last few days. You are so desparate to understand my method in detail and am not going to post any further details of it. If you want to figure out a way, figure it out through what is posted already.
#7
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
February 03, 2014, 12:35:52 PMQuote from: Albalaha on February 01, 2014, 06:55:35 AMI don't answer to ghosts. I thought Albalaha left all public forums long ago. Can you prove that you are not ghost? I will prove that my system works.
Pockets,
Why don't u put your calculations right here, for everyone to see and understand clearly? Let everyone see whether the winnings come at which cost and a single MM being followed in all bets or not. Your rules as you wrote are not very clear to me and many more.
In case you are not ghost, I don't care if the rules are not clear to you. I have given step by step explanation. Read them over and over again and try working your way through the concepts. I can only show you the way to the toilet, can't wipe the dirty thing for you.
#8
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
February 03, 2014, 12:27:20 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on January 31, 2014, 05:04:47 PMSam,
Pockets
Let me see if I got it........
1. Bet for 36 spins (6 units down to 1) Stop and go virtual after spin 36 if you have not won.
2. Do not bet until you get a hit.
3. Bet for another 36 spins at 1 unit. Stop and go virtual until another hit if you have not won.
4. Anytime you reach 100 lost spins without a win, double your bet.
Is that it? If I bot it, Nick needs exact rules.
Sam
I have PMed you the exact step by step rules, as you seem to be the only person interested in this at the moment.
#9
Math & Statistics / Re: z score
February 03, 2014, 12:25:34 PMQuote from: Marshall Bing Bell on February 03, 2014, 05:51:08 AMI have typically seen 28 numbers performing above expectation.
Thanks Bayes,
18 would seem the obvious answer but I was curious to see if perhaps it might be something more related to the law of third, like 24 or something.
For instance, the table supplied by Xander shows 25 numbers performing above expectation, which is exactly what I'm looking for when attempting to "lasso" the random variance.
#10
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 05:03:10 PM
I have tested against the following.
34 - 1084u
29 - 1552u
00 - 2990u
2 of best performign and the next worst number after 3.
34 - 1084u
29 - 1552u
00 - 2990u
2 of best performign and the next worst number after 3.
#11
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 04:56:43 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on January 30, 2014, 03:47:07 PM
Pockets
I have done some real-money play with your idea. I think I won .33!
I quit when I came to a problem. Let's say you go through the first 36 spins. You go to virtual and wait for a hit. Then you resume at level 1. Question: Do you just keep betting at that level until you finally get a hit on the selected number? And then resume at level 6?
Sam, it goes like this. Lets say there is a progression that goes from level 6 to level 1 for 100 spins.
First 36 spins - no hit. You are at progression number 36. Wait for virtual hit. Now once the virtual hit is complete, proceed from progression number 37 for another 36 spins.
Question 2: I'm not sure when you should double your bet. After losing X number of bets? What?
You double your bet only when you lose all the 100 steps in the progression. If you get any win in between, even if you are in negative, you will not double up your bet.
Sam
#12
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 04:07:29 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on January 31, 2014, 04:05:42 PMWhat i have is a .pdf file.
Pockets
Is the "Zuma Tester Library" a .txt file or books?
Sam
#13
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 02:55:38 AMQuote from: Albalaha on January 30, 2014, 08:22:05 AMAlbalaha - Only you and me know the reason why i requested for it. I wanted to confirm something and that confirmation is not on the strategy that I posted. I asked you over here and in rf.cc. You comfortably replied with the file in one and not in other I will not get into further details, as i got what i wanted.
4 days back, Pockets took entire zumma w/l from me
Now, coming to zumma tester.
1. My brother runs owns a set of subway outlets. He hates it when someone pays for one unlimited cocacola and shares it with the entire group.
2. I own the complete zumma tester library, bought around a year back for around 100 quids.
3. Patience is a virtue.
#14
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 02:48:29 AMQuote from: Albalaha on January 30, 2014, 10:48:53 AMAlbalaha - You seem to have a good knowledge of what others are doing. I think i might do a search on my house for any spycams and microphones.
but he got silent after knowing its reality
#15
General Discussion / Re: Musings - Albalaha and his open challenge
January 31, 2014, 02:47:09 AMQuote from: TwoCatSam on January 30, 2014, 03:47:07 PMThanks for testing Sam. Let me post a spin by spin example of playing number 3 in zumma. Then may be things will be clearer. Gimme a day or two.
Pockets
I have done some real-money play with your idea. I think I won .33!
I quit when I came to a problem. Let's say you go through the first 36 spins. You go to virtual and wait for a hit. Then you resume at level 1. Question: Do you just keep betting at that level until you finally get a hit on the selected number? And then resume at level 6?
Question 2: I'm not sure when you should double your bet. After losing X number of bets? What?
Sam