Quote from: TwoCatSam on July 10, 2013, 04:08:24 PM@ Sam - http://www.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=3622.0
Yanks
I don't suppose you could direct me to the location where you read that. You may be right.
Sam
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#121
Community Software / Re: Vic, could we reprise the "VLS LW Methodology"?
July 11, 2013, 09:07:34 AM #122
General Discussion / Re: For the first time in a while I closed the month with gains.
July 11, 2013, 08:41:55 AM
Well done dear!
#123
Dozen/Column / Re: The Easy-Peasy II System
July 10, 2013, 05:52:47 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on July 10, 2013, 05:18:09 PMHey Sam, cn you point me to it. I am not able to find anything in the name master of pockets
Master of Pockets posted something very like unto this a while back. I thought it was good then and I'll try it now.
TwoCat
#124
Community Software / Re: Vic, could we reprise the "VLS LW Methodology"?
July 10, 2013, 03:39:45 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on July 10, 2013, 02:24:33 PMI cannot see how JD won since the 27 that came was one of the last two dozens to come.Sam, hving gone through the old forum over the weekend, what understand about JD is, it is betting against the last dozen to repeat(betting on two dozens which is not the last one appeared). LDi is betting for one of the last two dozens to repeat.
Enlighten me.
Sam
Going by the logic, the screenshot says 16(2nd dozen), JD means 1st or 3rd dozen to appear. 27 appears and hence is a win. Am I right. did I enlighten you
#126
Gizmotron / Re: Welcome return to Gizmotron/Mark
July 10, 2013, 02:24:37 AMQuote from: Gizmotron on July 09, 2013, 06:27:06 AMLooking fwd gizmo
I'll start a new thread tomorrow .
#127
Off-topic / Re: Signatures....
July 10, 2013, 02:12:55 AM
Great Vic and Chris!
The next signature that caught my eye is from another grampa (Guess Ralph, don't mind me calling this). The signature is " The best way to fail, is not to try! "
There is a reason why people say signatures are really a reflection of one's self and this is a classic example. We would not have had an electric bulb today if Edison didn't see all the failures on choosing the element for the filament as a success in proving that those are not the right elements. We wouldn't have aeroplanes if people didn't believe in flying and didn't try to. You don't try something, then you are automatically classified as having failed to do that thing. Someone said. Dream! without dreaming, you wouldn't try and without trying you wouldn't succeed!
Ooh! Its late and I think I am blabbering! Better go to sleep now and try dreaming
The next signature that caught my eye is from another grampa (Guess Ralph, don't mind me calling this). The signature is " The best way to fail, is not to try! "
There is a reason why people say signatures are really a reflection of one's self and this is a classic example. We would not have had an electric bulb today if Edison didn't see all the failures on choosing the element for the filament as a success in proving that those are not the right elements. We wouldn't have aeroplanes if people didn't believe in flying and didn't try to. You don't try something, then you are automatically classified as having failed to do that thing. Someone said. Dream! without dreaming, you wouldn't try and without trying you wouldn't succeed!
Ooh! Its late and I think I am blabbering! Better go to sleep now and try dreaming
#128
Community Software / Re: Roulette Assist
July 10, 2013, 01:17:02 AMQuote from: marivo on July 09, 2013, 04:18:24 PMSend the screenshot
Sorry, I get same message.
#129
Street / Re: Quad Cycle
July 10, 2013, 01:10:08 AM
Hey Turner,
My guess is you are playing it right. It indeed goes horrible with 9 straight losses within the first few spins. But I guess its part of the game, as it recovers with 6 straight wins after that. Following is the summary and the BR graph for all the 271 spins you have posted. I have also attached the excel (refer Play2 - session 2 sheet).
51 spins - -6u
100 spins - +90u
151 spins - +228u
200 spins - +336u
271 spins - +312u
[attachimg=2]
Cheers
Yanks!
PS : May be we can consider waiting for virtual win when there are 3 consecutive losses.
My guess is you are playing it right. It indeed goes horrible with 9 straight losses within the first few spins. But I guess its part of the game, as it recovers with 6 straight wins after that. Following is the summary and the BR graph for all the 271 spins you have posted. I have also attached the excel (refer Play2 - session 2 sheet).
51 spins - -6u
100 spins - +90u
151 spins - +228u
200 spins - +336u
271 spins - +312u
[attachimg=2]
Cheers
Yanks!
PS : May be we can consider waiting for virtual win when there are 3 consecutive losses.
#130
Creativity Adventures / Re: Chasing The 3rd Col_
July 09, 2013, 04:33:50 PM
Chris, why black + columns and not red+columns?
#131
Community Software / Re: Roulette Assist
July 09, 2013, 01:24:03 PM
For those using 32bit OS might want to use this. @Marivo, are you using a 32bit OS? Try this and let me know if it works.
#132
Street / Re: Matrix Quad Cycle
July 09, 2013, 01:09:26 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on July 09, 2013, 04:17:37 AMMay be not personal interactions, but I think I have read most of his works. I am known to wear glasses that filters and shows only good part of people and I think I do learn a lot as I go through his posts. the only post that's a no-no is the challenge post on HAR(sh)
Ah, Jl. Where has the boy gone? I do so miss him. Seriously!
And I'm sad our newest worker bee, Yanks, is not getting to know him.
#133
Community Software / Re: Roulette Assist
July 09, 2013, 01:05:48 PMQuote from: marivo on July 09, 2013, 12:01:46 PMSend some error screenshots along with your OS version.
When I try to run it, it says its not valid Win32 application?!
#134
Street / Re: Quad Cycle
July 09, 2013, 03:13:24 AM
Sorry Turner. Was unclear in my explanation.
Basically am trying to play quads as even chances. So at any point in time, I play two quads together (6 streets).
Say for example, the last three spins are 25, 19, 2. This comprises of 2 quads. I play both these quads. Now every spin, I alternate between two quads that are appeared last to quads that didn't appear.
For example, if the spin data is like this 25, 19, 2, 2, 17, 12, 30, 3. I play like.
25
19
2 - tracking spin ends. two distinct quads.
2 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
17 - bet against the last two quads that appeared to repeat. Win
12 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
30 - bet against the last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
3 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. loss
In case I get a double loss, I stay on the same bet selection for one spin. ie, stay on for if I was betting for.
I am using a simple cyclic progression which is +1 win/-1loss on cycles of 5.
I am attaching the complete play for the numbers that you have played in the first post here. Refer to sheet "Play 2". Will be keen to know your views. I have done number of tests and it seems to hold up.
Note : Play 1 sheet was a different experiment. Will explain that probably once am sure with more tests.
Basically am trying to play quads as even chances. So at any point in time, I play two quads together (6 streets).
Say for example, the last three spins are 25, 19, 2. This comprises of 2 quads. I play both these quads. Now every spin, I alternate between two quads that are appeared last to quads that didn't appear.
For example, if the spin data is like this 25, 19, 2, 2, 17, 12, 30, 3. I play like.
25
19
2 - tracking spin ends. two distinct quads.
2 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
17 - bet against the last two quads that appeared to repeat. Win
12 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
30 - bet against the last two quads that appeared to repeat. win
3 - bet for one of last two quads that appeared to repeat. loss
In case I get a double loss, I stay on the same bet selection for one spin. ie, stay on for if I was betting for.
I am using a simple cyclic progression which is +1 win/-1loss on cycles of 5.
I am attaching the complete play for the numbers that you have played in the first post here. Refer to sheet "Play 2". Will be keen to know your views. I have done number of tests and it seems to hold up.
Note : Play 1 sheet was a different experiment. Will explain that probably once am sure with more tests.
#135
Community Software / Roulette Assist
July 09, 2013, 02:32:38 AM
One of the things that I struggled as a new comer was capturing trends in ECs which do not appear visually in the marquee i.e. H/L and O/E. The attached tool will help overcome that issue.
The next feature of this tool is what Drazen asked Vic in one of his posts. "After x in a row you play until win but max lets say 3 times. If no win you abandon it and search next trigger like that".
I am planning to run this tool as an open source project. Interested parties pls contact me to be part of the open source project. I will post the code as well later this week.
Also, any wishlist for features pls post here. Will be prioritized for implementation
Cheers
Yanks!
The next feature of this tool is what Drazen asked Vic in one of his posts. "After x in a row you play until win but max lets say 3 times. If no win you abandon it and search next trigger like that".
I am planning to run this tool as an open source project. Interested parties pls contact me to be part of the open source project. I will post the code as well later this week.
Also, any wishlist for features pls post here. Will be prioritized for implementation
Cheers
Yanks!