All ears!

I shouldn't speak too soon, as I am just a rookie. But this is one method that interested me, and I was looking at means of accelerating the game, as this is tad slow.  So I will share what is holding up in the testing so far for me. But wanted to hear your opinion.

It is played a little like the "for" vs "against" method. After two losses, virtual bets until a win and then commence from where it was left. Following is how it works for the numbers atlantis posted.

[reveal=  Here is +150u from 80 spins]
4 - track
2 - track. Two different sectors. Play the last two sectors appeared.
4 - for. win. + 6.
3 - against. Win + 12
4 - for. win. +18
4 - against. loss. +12
4 - for win +24
3 - against. loss +18
1 - for. loss +6
1 - against. virtual loss
2 - for. virtual loss
4 - against. virtual win.
4 - for. win. +30
0 - against. loss +24
4 - for. win +36
3 - against. win +42
4 - for. win +48
2 - against. win +54
2 - for, win +60
4 - against. loss +54
4 - for. win +66
4 - against. loss +60
1 - for. loss +48
4 - against. virtual loss
3- for. virtual loss
3 - against. virtual loss
4- for. virtual win
2 - against.win +72
2- for win +78
2 0 against. loss +72
1 for. loss +60
3 - against virtual win
3 - for. win +84
3 - against. loss +78
4 - for loss +66
1 - against virtual win
1 - for. win. +90
2 - against. win +96
1 - for win +102
2 - against. loss +96
2 - for win. +108
1 - against. loss +102
4 - for. loss +90
4 - against virtual loss
2 - for virtual loss
4 - against. virtual loss
1 - for virtual loss
4 - against. virtual loss
4 - for virtual win
1 - against. loss - +66
2 - virtualloss
4 - for . virtual loss
2- against. virtual loss
4 - for. virtual win
4 - for. win 72
1- against win 78
1 - for win 84
2- against. win 90
2 - for win 96
1 - against. loss 90
2 - for. win 102
2- against. loss 96
1 - for . win 108
2 - against loss 102
4 - for loss 90
4 - against. virtual loss
3 - for. virtual loss
2 - against. virtual win
2 - win. 114
2 - against .lost +108
1 - for. loss +96
4 - aga8hst virtua win
4 - for, win - 120
1 - against. 114
2 - for. loss 102
1 - against. virtual loss
1 - for. virtual win
4 - against. 126
4 - for . 132
2 - against. 138
2 - for 144
2 - against. 138
4 - for 150
[/reveal]

Signatures - They refer to the characteristic expression of a process or a thing or  a person. And over the short time I have been associated with this community there are certain signatures that caught my eye. I wanted to use this thread for everyone to capture any signatures that caught your eye and a short brief on what you derive out of it or explain their own signatures. No links please Else the mods will have a tough time to mod:)

Let me start the thread with a tribute to Greatgrampa. When I was asking where to start, a lot of people PMed me to read every single word he has written in this forum. Initially, I thought what all the fuss is about. Then when I started reading them, I realized those words are a new comers paradise. Its not the systems that caught my eye, with all due respect, as it might figure out in the top systems that have been written about. It is the way he explains the concepts, it is the way he understands the game inside out and able to bring out insights, it is way he puts things in a simplistic manner, it is the way he encourages people to have a open thought process, it is the way he is able to synchronize his thought process with other experienced people in the forum is what I am impressed about. It is sad that he couldn't complete all the threads that he started, but I for one is looking forward for his return to learn more from his experience.

Coming back to the signatures it was "Greatgrampa - Your friend and mine".

Reminds me of Peppa pig and Mr. Potato. Mr. Potato is the only non-animal character in the Peppa pig series. For people who don't know Peppa pig it's a cartoon in UK and I am a fan. Mr. Potato greets everyone with this line. Greatgrampa somehow fits into this standing out from the crowd. That way the signature is a true reflection of his character which is individualistic and at the same time very friendly and approachable. "Your friend and mine" - is he talking about roulette, is he talking about his character Greatgrampa? Only he can tell. But this definitely caught my eye, treating himself as a third person


Disclaimer : None of the signatures are mine and I don't want to offend anyone. If your signature appears here and if you don't like what's written, I politely request you to PM the person who posted it and get it removed. Thanks!

Thanks ND. Have bought the book from JP. Reading through it now. Very interesting.

Thanks! Here you go Vic! Few spins from when I played the ECPC system from the cinema hall.

[reveal]
21
0
34
35
30
18
22
18
24
24
21
29
25
6
34
24
2
11
22
13
10
35
31
3
36
33
25
7
9
16
12
13
21
34
12
12
14
22
35
1
28
9
20
6
36
25
22
14
30
12
27
15
21
4
0
31
20
11
3
22
21
18
7
19
3
11
19
19
32
22
25
8
18
7
17
30
16
11
5
27
30
34
7
6
19
35
10
16
6
18
12
29
34
24
34
23
10
23
33
16
12
29
25
21
14
13
18
33
20
[/reveal]

Breno

I don't really have an answer for that. I can say that I was not happy with the progression as it raises my heart rate. So essentially I have modified play to use this bet selection but use the other elements of triple shooter including cyclic progression.  Working fine so far. 

Congrats Chris

thanks Soggett.


Vic, is it possible to explain with some numbers. it's a bit difficult to interpret.

May be am not playing not as much as you guys do. but mostly BV h been smooth and gt disconnected only once.

Quote from: soggett on July 03, 2013, 01:31:31 PM
tested a couple of sessions with just 1,2,3 then reset - this performs quite good, I get about 10-20 units per 100 spins
still early but quite good
flatbetting has also an apeal here, low win goal is easily obtained
very nice Vic 

Sogget,

Can you show with 6-8 spins on how you play it?

'Bindi' - Indian name. Does it signify something else.

By the way, did he teach you playing "Labby"

Now I can see the second one as well. Equally cute  . What's his name?

And that's mine. With my twin and the younger one! I adore them.

Thanks Turner for the explanations! Still practicing it.

@ Turner. I have been studying this method with great appreciation of the complex bet selection. I have a couple of questions, if you can help answer these, it will be really great.

See the attached image.
You mentioned don't track back beyond zero. So once the zero appears here, should I abandon the spins I have been tracking so far and start tracking all again?
Second question is, around the first bet. It should ideally be 2 dozens covering the quad. Here there is only one dozen. Do you do one dozen with 2u or you include the 2nd dozen as well?