Quote from: malcop on August 20, 2013, 09:15:30 PM
Will the software say that you entered 87 spins or do you have to keep track your self?  I ask because I entered over 200 spins and it still seemed to be working by giving different streets.

Malcop, it won't keep a track. After 200, it will still give you results, but they have not been tested enough by me. Btn, how is the output working for you?

Quote from: Drazen on August 20, 2013, 06:19:31 PM
Here you have nice tables for better handicaps understanding.

http://www.valuepunter.com/asianhandicap-table.htm

Cheers

Drazen

Thanks Drazen. Very useful link

Quote from: Bally6354 on August 20, 2013, 09:04:11 PM
Anyway, I will try and find one selection for each weekend which I think represents a bit of value.

Thanks Bally. I think that will really really help

Bally,

It is primarily for RNG spins. I haven't tested on live spins yet.

Thanks Sam! It will really help.

Hi Everyone,

After carefully studying random and analysing SHA256 random generation techniques combined with the 12 million spin data I have been able to predict random behaves with 80-85% accuracy. I have developed an applications that gives these predictions and bet recommendations on streets, based on past spin data of 5 spins. It uses complex data insight generation techniques and 256 dimension cubes to arrive at these predictions.

The application is attached as I want to share it with the community. You input spins as and when it comes along and then start betting the streets that is shown in the recommendation window which is red in colour. The application can handle sessions upto 87 spins at the moment. Application is in trial mode and is working based on my checks of over 50,000 spins.






Use cyclic progression o 12 spins with +1 on loss -1 on win and reset o high
CAUTION - Please use only in the fun mode at the moment as it
is still in alpha mode and can only deliver 80-85% accuracy. If anyone using it can report back their results and how it works for them, it will be great.

- Enjoy, Yanks.

Dane, it is a bit confusing for me I guess.
Are you able to confirm am doing it right in the following video snippet?

Order of ABC

Superman, that singles vs series is just a start, as I wanted to explore the concept step by step.

Based on your advice you gave 5 days back, I have started jumping into betting early, as early as after the 1st spin. It is so surprising to note that almost 30-40% of my sessions end in 2 spins. Have to consider myself extremely lucky. Once the game stretches after 2 spins, it is all about keeping cool, playing every spin and a very flexible money management which is completely driven by your confidence on what is happening on the table.

The advice on not getting scared to play even when you are not confident is top notch. Have noticed that more than 50-60% of the time, it gives a win covering some ground. It was very difficult to start with, now it is getting a bit easier, but still needs lot of focus and patience to kill the urge to cover more ground. And being in the right frame of mind is the topmost learning here I believe. I see that once I cross 10 spins are so, I seem to get impatient. That is where this whole thing helps and I have had probably about 5 sessions which went past 10 spins.

To say it in ignatus way, "This works". At least so far, as it has been 5 days since I started on this.

I just completed my 50th mini-session playing this way and happy to report that all 50 sessions are winners.  The maximum draw down within a single session so far was 15$ or 3u. My biggest unit size was 3u or 15$.


On a different note, well it took me 50 sessions to gain 50 units, but it was all done with no stress and no drawdowns and no deep progressions. Going by this, I could easily set up a 5u stop loss and proceed. ATM, still playing for 1u win and 1u being 5$. The plan is to get to double the bankroll and then increase the unit size 1.5 times.


Thanks Superman! You are really a superman!

A simple self explanatory video on this.

Chapter 1

Chapter 1 : Series and Singles
I wanted to keep this first chapter as simple as it can get. I am ignoring standard deviations, ignoring complex probabilities, ignoring regression to the mean. We all know that every single EC shows up in the table as a singles or a series.

Now for simplicity sake, in this example, lets follow only Red.
A single is when a single Red number is preceded and followed by a black number. "BRB" or "BRBB" or "BBBRB"
A series is when a Red number follows another red number. It could be a series of 2 reds, series of 3 reds, 4 reds, so on. But I am going to classify all these as "Series" to start with. As we get into further chapters we can discuss multitude of series.   BRRRB, RRRRBBBB, RRBB, BRRB – all these are examples of a Red series.

Let's start with an example RRBRBRBRRRRRBRRBBRRRB. Going by the above definitions we discussed, Red follows the pattern.
RRB   -     RB       -  RB       -     RRRRRB   -     RRBB    -   RRRB
Series -     Single  - Single   -      Series         -      Series    -    Series

Now let's see the first simple playable method using this concept and using the example above. We will use "follow the last" to either bet on a single to form or a series to form.
RRB – The next appearance of Red, we will bet for a series to form. So we will bet on red, when red appears next. We will bet only once.
RB – We lost the bet. Following the last, the next appearance of red, we will bet for single to form. So we will bet on black, when red appears next. We will bet only once
RB – Won. Following the last, The next appearance of red, we will bet for single to form. So we will bet on black, when red appears next. We will bet only once.
RRRRRB – Lost. Following the last, The next appearance of red, we will bet for a series to form. So we will bet on red, when red appears next. We will bet only once.
RRB – Won. Following the last, The next appearance of red, we will bet for a series to form. So we will bet on red, when red appears next. We will bet only once.
BRRRB – Won.

So we have 3 wins out of 5 placed bets. Now this is a simple method to follow series and singles on one EC. Once this concept is to me, I think I can use this to device a number of methods like betting the dominant, playing against the last, playing a pattern, playing both red and black, playing one outcome per EC, a mix and match of ECs so on and so forth.

The key here is irrespective of the length of the series, I am treating Series as a series and playing Singles and series like I would play ECs. Because we are playing like ECs, any progression that I am comfortable using in ECs, I can use here.

This is I think as simple as it can get. Now in the next chapter, I shall brainstorm taking into consideration series and singles within an EC as one unit, in other words considering the series and singles formed through red and black together. But before getting into the next one, I would like to gather some feedback.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on August 16, 2013, 01:09:09 PM
A small video with vocals would go a long way to showing this can be done in reality and not just in theory.  That is, if anyone truly wants to teach the method.  Not saying you can't do it; I'm asking if you truly want to disclose it.

Quote from: Turner on August 16, 2013, 04:19:09 PM
I think the 3SD guys won't go that far...
I know why. it's a difficult concept to work with and takes a lot of study, and why do all the hard work, then just go tell someone who hasn't. I've lived with it for 20 years in Chess clubs....

This conversation triggered this post. It might be possible that those who are practicing it, don't have the time and energy to do so or simply don't want to do so. But that didn't stop them from dropping hints all over the place in these forums. So, now this post is an attempt to get all those concepts together and derive a playable method from that. I think, I have figured out overall a set of 5-6 concepts that forms of the back bone of this. I will start describing one by one the way I understand it, so that others who know about this can contribute as and when we go along. The end product is a mixture of all these concepts and how to play all of them in parallel. This thread will not be a success without contribution from everyone, without which it will be just my viewpoint from what I have seen so far.

I thought if we use Kelly criterion, it will just advice not to place any bets on roulette. Is it not true?

Thanks Bally and Breno. Good weekend. My BR is up by 4.25. But this shows why a knowledge of game is important. Look at the second bet. I could have won that bet, had I placed it in the right place. I thought bookings match bet is same as w/L, only to realize it is not

How about backing MC against Newcastle tomm? Anyone except Turner can answer this

Superman, thanks. Its working very sweet so far. Had few sessions today, whenever I felt so. Short bursts are really stress free. As you rightly said, look at the session durations, real sweet.

[reveal]
[attachimg=1][attachimg=2]
[/reveal]