TwoCat, I'm right here.
With Live games, I'm thinking anytime there are 'significant' losses, casinos can close the table for
"maintenance"--or in case of a B&M oust the big winner--or offer an incentive for players to try the RNG games.
I'm trying to figure out at what point (since online casinos) real money RNGs stop allowing wins for a player or give another player a 'random' jackpot.
They do not need to manipulate to earn and they can't manipulate in most cases.--Al
Casinos are genuises at manipulating games imo. They have to stay ahead of enterprising players just in case.
Their manipulations kill the math argument.
With Live games, I'm thinking anytime there are 'significant' losses, casinos can close the table for
"maintenance"--or in case of a B&M oust the big winner--or offer an incentive for players to try the RNG games.
I'm trying to figure out at what point (since online casinos) real money RNGs stop allowing wins for a player or give another player a 'random' jackpot.
They do not need to manipulate to earn and they can't manipulate in most cases.--Al
Casinos are genuises at manipulating games imo. They have to stay ahead of enterprising players just in case.
Their manipulations kill the math argument.