Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Ralph

#106
General Discussion / Re: The JohnLegend challenge
March 05, 2013, 08:18:18 AM
He hold it longer than I expected. I got it  as he bet 2/3, and it works as long you not fell back a bit, heavy to recover.  I am not very surprised.
I know, I have had methods working for month, and still can lose more than it wins.


I think JL will come back with same or higher claims of how he beat the game after some time, It is done for years, the archives on the net is full of it.


Wish him good luck!


#107
Quote from: Chrisbis on March 05, 2013, 06:42:01 AM
Do you have a specific trigger point/entry point?


No, but I use to take a number which allready has hit, and shows on the marque. I do not think it matters. I use autospin.
#108
Quote from: Chrisbis on March 05, 2013, 06:03:27 AM
Hi Ralph.
What's the bet?
following a single number?
or are u playing repeaters?
chris


I bet one number, I use to change numbers and try to catch repeaters. I did however once 5000 spins on just one number and went good plus. I have recovered half of the loss, up to now, using an other method (reverse martingale on EC).
#109
The session was not successful, went bust before 10000 plus, a loss of 4000 units. that's happens we can not always win!


40 Euro to catch up, we have to stay cool and let it take its time.
#110
Quote from: Chrisbis on March 04, 2013, 10:08:30 PM
Hello Ralph, and hello to everyone else here in this section.
I was pointed to this section by a friend (thanks Lady K)...
May I ask the obvious question please............
have you told us in this or other section, what the method is that your playing?
If anyone knows of me, you know I love a good bot!
Love to know more details Ralph.
2000 Euro/month would do me just fine!!


Regards Chris




First of all  I do not endorse gambling, and can not guarantee any of my methods will win, If I do the play or anybody else. Using this method we should have 10000 units and be prepared for the situation it can be lost. We always play at a risk of losing money.


We know it is a bit more than 60% chance to hit a single in 37 spins. We pocket every win, and stop at the time 10000 units are gone.
We have as target to be more than 10000 units plus by then. This method has the advantages and problem similar to Winkel's "Win as much you want". 


Reset on new high. The use of 0.01 chips as the risking money is Euro 100. We must be able to take a loss of such amount with a breeze. If  we hit during the 37 spins, we reset the count but stay at the same stake. We increase the bet if 37 spins and no hit.
We use fib progression, 1,3,5,8,13,21...  We will survive if no number sleeps more than 500 spins, and that not comes many times in a row it is 300 or more. Quite aggressive play which gain good if it survive.


I will start a session now and publish the result.
#111
Quote from: Sputnik on March 03, 2013, 08:46:21 PM
Hello eller Hej på svenska ... jag är trött på mitt roulette hjul, du kan få köpa det billigt  ^-^
I wrote in Swedish if he wants to buy me wheel ...

Well i wondering do you use any kind of stop loss and win targets when you play ... ?


I should have space for it, but I think my wife thinks it is better in the computer or at a casino like in Malmoe.
If a casino license comes with it I may consider it.  :))


I decide before the play the risk amount, if I lose it or when, because it is a matter of time. I pocket the wins, and hope that is larger than the risk money at the time I bust. I normally not set a win target, it is just like take a break. I can stop for many reasons, but not because of a win.
#112
Quote from: Gorkin on March 03, 2013, 08:42:27 PM
Hi Ralph. Interesting.
How many steps are you using when win and then reset?


We lose a chip every time we not reach new high.  I reset on new high, even if first bet. If back I try until I reach new high, it can be several steps, but I try until new high! We lose only one then we lose, how far we ever go, so I run until I hit new high. The reason is every step double the win if we hit, and it is 50% chance. Try in fun, seven in a row comes more often than we think. It is not often we need seven to go back from some losses.
#113
3971 spins in two days , the worse drowndrown  524 units, recover with  series of 11 blacks.
I have went down to one unit after each loss, have not yet checked if it is the best, or try to stop and reset before on new plus. It should not matter, as every step longer gains double and have 50% chance(NoZ).
#114
General Discussion / Re: Question for the experts
March 03, 2013, 02:54:43 PM
Everyone makes betselections, except those who close the eyes, and throw a random amount against the table. If we do any decision we have a selection.
#115
General Discussion / Re: Entry points
March 03, 2013, 06:33:43 AM
Quote from: MarignyGrilleau on March 03, 2013, 12:20:07 AM
Suppose one would only interact with the game whenever a certain position (Even Chance, Dozen, Column, Double Street, Street, Split, Straight) reaches 4 Standard Deviations.
Would the fluctuation be the same as with any random entry point?


It is a good chance it will not be the same, maybe just to the fact it is a different entry point. The changes are always, but when?


I had just this, would I expect a black streak? I do not know, but will see.
#116
Playing 0.1 chips at NOZ for about  a week.  We lose slow, and if we dare we can win big. I do not press while flow, just reset everytime at new plus, but if low not hesitate to  wait for seven hits or more if needed to catch up . I follow the last most of the time, but if it starts chopping I follow that(GF but I do).
#117
Straight-up / Re: Predicting the outcome of roulette
February 28, 2013, 08:32:27 PM
Pls Do not paste, do paragraphs, I simply can not read it. To many (long) posts I do not read, due to massive block of text, space it in paragraphs.

[Moderator's Edit:  Quite right, Ralph. I've now spaced it out properly.    Wannawin -- please note for the future. Thank you. ]

#118
Jenningsbet.com  0.01 Sterling
#119
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Is this win target an illusion?
February 27, 2013, 10:24:27 AM
Quote from: albalaha on February 26, 2013, 08:33:06 AM
keep playing even in your best day and you are bound to come home empty handed.


Does it matter which day you lose? Or are you believing in HAR?
#120
Quote from: Bayes on February 27, 2013, 09:01:47 AM
Thanks for the links Bally. I once wrote a sim of 'Turnaround' and thought I'd found the holy grail. I never actually played it because the stakes get too high at times. I see from the updates that things haven't changed much in that dept. Still, it's a winner if you have the balls and the bankroll.


Still we can lose badly. Things has changed with internet casinos. The old classic methods were not for all players designed to have a larger bankroll.  It is possible for more to use a bankroll of 100000 on a penny casino. And then try to ride out difficult swings. A loss is still possible, but you do not need  to be billionare to give it a try.   Myself think it is dangerous to leave the pennies when ahead, just rise the stake to 10 cent is tenfold, and a bad streak will fast take back all winnings. Better test the luck using higher first, and then reduce the bets.  I have got impossible runs RFH three times this year losing  about 200 Euro, and have a net of 3800 Euro. If I had rise the stake to even 0.1, I have maybe still been in plus, but the loss had been 2000 Euro. I may have lost more session as it may be hard to have a stoploss at 1000 Euro or more. I think we can win for a while, sometimes a long while, but not forever.