Quote from: Razor on March 18, 2013, 09:47:02 PM
It s normal to have a lot of wins when you bet 20 numbers.

And normal to lose at rapid rate when it goes against, we never win enough on our streaks.

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 19, 2013, 05:41:13 AM

You have many posts there, which thread?

The most recent!   Try one two casinos.

I know many try, most is already tried!


My trials are posted in EC sector, 1000 and more are done.

1393 spins  done, and  182 units plus. It takes sometimes 20 spins to get 1 units plus. Never very down.  Starting bank was 300.

Quote from: Chrisbis on March 18, 2013, 06:38:34 PM
.
what does that mean Ralph?
[reveal] I'm not familiar with it. [/reveal]

House edge, I play on a zero wheel, and got less than 50/50 on the EC pay out. It eats more and more more you turn over the bankroll.
I have used the bankroll  several times during all spins, 1000 spins are more than 2000 units stake, and the HE takes 2.7% all the time.
The bankroll is 300, and  zero or HE has taken about 40 units.

At Dublin I did just a few spins , and got an other Euro. At BV I have done a lot more spins. The HE eats on the play, but I am slowly growing. Soon 1000 spins.  1.03 or 103 units plus.

Quote from: Sputnik on March 18, 2013, 05:58:45 PM

Nice, so how do you play only red ?
You see one red and jump on board or do have any other selection when you only play red ...
I could red that John Patrick speak of this method to pick a dominant ...

I am testing a progression, and the reason I use only red is to exclude selection as much as  possible. It is very easy too if you have bad sight.
In the long run, as I hope to run it (sort of) it should not matter much, we talk about 1000 of spins.  I test how a progression can stand the variance.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on March 18, 2013, 12:17:08 PM
Ralph

I respect you and your opinions. 

Consider these two statements:

1.  For no logical, physical, or mathematical reason, spun numbers regress toward the mean. 

2.  For no logical, physical, or mathematical reason, the furthest splits hit more than the last.

I started a thread calling #1 Gambler's Fallacy.  I was thoroughly corrected.  #2 is the same statement in different clothes.  I am again thoroughly corrected.  You can't have things two ways.  If #1 can happen for no physical, logical, or mathematical reason, so can #2.  I've made that argument over and over.  Basically, you cannot select your Voodoo.  Believe in one; believe in all!

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Chris

I am convinced BV is a fair RNG.  I do  not believe they send numbers to beat you for the following reason:

1.  The splits bet by L v F are constantly changing from spin to spin.  BV nor anyone else could ever program something to beat you.

2.  You can ask for a new 60 number trot at any time.

3.  You can change the sequence at any time.

4.  I can't tell you the number of times I've been down to my last bet and had the trot turn and I'd win going away. 

I've been playing with real Euro for some time now.  I'm playing three systems which I report on and one that I don't.  I would rate my overall performance as "fair".  I'm still in the game.  Thanks for the "good luck" wish.

There are no triggers for this system except who is furthest and who is last. 

Sam

Sam!
I agree, but still you can use your observations, the only thing we get, it can last or it can stop any time. The mean exist, but far away, so far it is only the casinos which can count with it, get there rake from many players over long time to an estimated rate.


The best way a casino can maximise theire profit, is to be honest. If we never win or win less than expected all the time, we will stop playing. Casinos earn from the turn over, which will stay low if we think they cheat. Even big winners are good for them, other see it and that does matter for the game business there are winners. The casino gain the same or more if there are winners, if all lose by 2.7% few will play. Most lose more, some wins, the casinos have a rather fixed part.

I have started a testing run with lowest possible stakes at Dublinbet and Bv. The play at Dublin I have a bank of 50 Euro and play EC on H/L using three lines (0.3 bets). I will play it until the bank is double or I am bust. Started today and ended with a bank of 52 Euro, not very long play. I will continue later.
I use parlay to try to recover losses here.



The other is at BV and I play only RED, testing a progression, which I think can take much against it. I have only put 300 units in that bank.
It is on Zero wheel, as the test is to see if the method can be used live.  Done  834 spins and are small a head. The zero takes its part.

At Bv I use a negative progression, not mechanical, I stake more when I feel it is on winning, and/or I am behind last high. Here I will test how far I can play with the bankroll of 3 Euro.

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 18, 2013, 10:25:16 AM
Ok Ralph, thanks for that.

MBB!


孫子 or  Sūnzǐ; as I spell it in letters,his book (The Art of War) was used during my  military education.  Do you apply this to the game?

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 18, 2013, 09:52:31 AM

No answer?

I am  Ralph and has never been used any other name on any roulette forum.

I am in the work to try to find a progression   which will survive a case like  65/135 in 200 spins, regardless how they fall. It can not always catch up during this spins, but are we expecting them to stay at that ratio?


First trials I will do on a zero wheel, on NOZ I think it may be possible.


The play will isolate the betselection, so I will always bet red. Could only do 405 spins before the server went to service.


I could make simulations, but what's the use to know it tanks at the time I have been dead for years. I think play is that counts.
We can never eternal beat the game, but maybe in our own play.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on March 18, 2013, 06:27:35 AM
I will stand by my statement:  The furthest definitely hit more than the last.

Frankly, I cannot see popping in and seeing the same thing time after time after time, day in and day out, and not using that word.  I totally believe in anomalies, but how long can an anomaly last?  Especially when the numbers are constantly changing?

We'll see.  If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.

Sam

It can stay long, if you see anything like this, you will have use of  it.  I had once at BV number 11 hitting abnormal for a few days.
The fact I observe it make much winnings.  It did not last forever, but long enough to make a nice win.


Observing the game is a key Sam!

 The most back may be hitting more for longer time, but I doubt it is so "definite".  You will see during your play how long it stays, and as long it does, you can benefit from that.

More than 50%  hit rate if flat betting or  more than 50% winning stakes, if it is not flat. Could we win the higher bets less than 50% can work.