Quote from: spike on January 29, 2013, 08:44:51 AM
What physical source? I checked out BV. "In field 3, the player can see the checksum of sequence, computed according to the SHA-256 algorithm."

Algorithm? Randomness Control? Who are they kidding. Everybody, obviously. Did you read their gobblygook explanation of how it works? This is how you get sleeping dozens and massive black dominance. 'Randomness Control'.

I prefer the little ball falling into the pocket.

You mix up the randomness controll, with what creating the random stream. That shows you have habit to not check up your statement very close.


Click this link, and you will get some knowledge of how the number stream is created.


http://www.idquantique.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9

It will add up, many small becomes more.

The streaks comes both losing and winning. A lot of the play I do relay on that observation. I however use it on inside bets, and very often a single number. If apply it on single numbers a quite larger bankroll is needed, which can be done using low units.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on January 29, 2013, 01:07:41 AM
Hey, Ralphster....

It's your money!  How much did you say you've made in the last ten days?

Sam

I win so much I am allowed. Since I got 2000, I went over to fun, and I will start real again any day, as soon the withdraw is cleared. The last ten days are always not the same, but current balance for the time is  6176.67.   The account says: 17997.67.


I will restart with real in two days with about 200, try to win or lose next month. If 200 is lost I retry once again the same month, otherwise waiting to next playing real, a way to not rush in case of bad luck.

JL, I just wonder about the possible  flaw in your method. You claim it will never lose. In such a case I should divide the table max with the progressions needed and use  higher value chips. If your method does not work with other than lower chips, you have not told us why. Or may it be so you need the lower chips value due to the table max divided with the ground chip becomes the progression needed?


Some of my methods frankly is so, and have a risk to lose, if minor.

Quote from: spike on January 28, 2013, 08:12:58 PM
Or so they say. Trust none of them.

If I give you 2 x 10000  numbers one from BV and one from a  famous BM casino, you have 50% chance to guess which is BV or the BM.  Tested by many.

Quote from: Sputnik on January 28, 2013, 07:24:54 PM
Did you use FTL with your test.
I can see you using spins and not placed bets.
How does your fibo look like.
My fibo look like this 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89

How can you see I not bet every spin? I do use every spin. In one picture I saw one but just one missing in the numbering of spins, it's a misstake by the casino software, as free spins is not permited at BV.


The fib is as 1,3,5............89


I used FTL near all the time, if it starts go choppy I use to try stay.

Most of the pattern and other systematic playerd use the history of spins to find a bet, anybody knows that by all math, will not work, to win you must build the method using the future spins. 

I will look into this problem, it is not an easy task, if you bet Euro 10, and are on 0.01 the bot have to place 1000 times, I may be to much for the flash recording. A more advanced script would place one or up to 10 chips on differnet dominions.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on January 28, 2013, 05:36:08 PM
400 GB

It is 4.00 GB RAM which should not be too small. This computer has more memory than mine.


Do you get it running onesplit, as it can not be so demanding?

I will try to find out, just now I have not a clue. Please tell which processor and how much RAM you got.  It is a memory demaded application, can you increase the virtual memory?

How many spins runs until it happen?

Sam!


I have to know a bit more, is it the last version? Is it only when you have many chips on the table?


I have had it in earler versions but not recent.

If we  bet smaller chip value and put more than one at start. If we start with winning and we bet only one at the time, and later the winning streak ends we start to add.


I we have 10 at the start and win ten in a row we are down to one, but a larger gain, then bet one a the time. 


The outcome of the first 20 bets can differ a lot depending when the wins come even if half are winnings.  10 win in a row follow by 10 loss or ever second win.


We cheat it so we try to keep the bets rather even . Up 2 sometimes and be not afraid to reduce in some cases to run trough a bad streak, we can  increase the stakes later like 2 on a loss when the losses are less frequent (that we can not know, but sometimes the guess is right).

I think the problem with the number history shall be solved in this version. I did test using M7 and set the playaccount to 60.00 and the win target to 90.00. That's a large win target of 3000  units, and then  make the fun betting going to many chips. I found it working all the way.


I would be good if some of the users did the same test, so we can be sure the number history will be correct.


If we find this problem solved and the number reading works, I will start and extend the range of money the bot can handle, for now it is from 0.00 to 100.00.




http://roullettebot.com/bot/BvBot.exe.zip