Passing 15000 units, in 7808 spins. The down drown was small.
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#377
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 08:28:17 PM
It is up to about 7600 spins now. The last play went rather well not any drown downs.
Plus is 14108.
Plus is 14108.
#378
Dozen/Column / Re: *******7 on 1*******
January 19, 2013, 06:06:51 PMQuote from: TwoCatSam on January 19, 2013, 05:27:21 PM
John
I have an old Chinese proverb for you. "The man who chases two rabbits catches neither."
Not ragging on you, but if one system works why look for more?
Sam
I do not need a bust to shift. I shift methods sometimes to not going into a boring routine.
And maybe the casino use players signature!
#379
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 05:59:09 PM
Could gone badly, it was not much left of the 100.00 in the account, so draw down was over 9000 units, the bet size went to 250 (It should have been a bit less in bet according to fib, I counted wrong on a lower step). Hit on third attempt and went up to 100.88. (I start always on 100.00 and pocket all plus). Number 1 was sleeping very long.
New High is: 13238 Total spins and all on number one are 6656.
New High is: 13238 Total spins and all on number one are 6656.
#380
Off-topic / Re: horsemeat found in 'tesco' burgers!!
January 19, 2013, 05:51:51 PMQuote from: dino246 on January 18, 2013, 03:33:09 PM
According to the UKIP leader on Question Time last night,all Salami meat imported into the UK has Donkey in it.
That's going to naw at me for ages !!
The truth is real salamai of Hungarian style SHOULD have donkey meat, otherwhise it is fake!
#381
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 02:48:18 PM
5700 spins done, and I think I have to take a break. It will be continued!
Plus 11264
Plus 11264
#382
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 01:34:55 PM
Now 5000 spins done (all with bets). It went slow as most of the hits come late in the 37 cycle, best is always a hit a few spins later after then the bet is somewhat higher.
10385 units plus.
10385 units plus.
#383
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 12:24:52 PMQuote from: TwisterUK on January 19, 2013, 11:02:27 AM
Ralph, quick question. Is there a reason you use BV auto spin as opposed to your Bot for betting 1 number ?
Thanx
The reason is I have not coded the method. I may do it, or anybody can do it.
#384
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 10:01:30 AMThe serious part:
If I should play this real, first I would decide the risking money.
It would be 100.00 or 1000.00, in the first case I should play the first
session trying to reach 100 as I have done in this test.Next I would
stop at 50 knowing the worse case would be break even, if the second
winning I would go until the first loss, which should end up with a
100 win at least.
If I would risk 1000, I would go to 500 using 0.1 chips, then change
to 0.01 and play sessions aiming for 50, if lose the first stop.
If win at least 4 more I would accept 2 losses.
The method use to win, but we can lose and lose if happens to be without any
luck.
The test is now up to 4200 spins and got 10000 units. The deepest
draw down was 4000.
The more ironic part:
This HG I play in fun mode, because near every demonstration of a HG
is done in a simulation or in video fun mode. In fun mode the bankroll
is without limit, so we video record the whole day and we can then
take the best frames for Youtube.
First we put maximum in the fun account, make some hefty bets on
the EC.s, if loss we can refill the account, and soon we will have
the creditable amount of 50000.00, not more it looks too good.
We should use this method and bot it (it is allowed to steal), and to prevent reverse engineering
we must add something as random chose of numbers and random spins on each
number (I use number 1 all the time). Complexity makes credits on
the market.
We could use martingale instead of fib in the demonstration, the best
part in the video will show incredible winnings. We must state it never lose,
nobody buy it if you even mention it can lose. Do not forget to
use Copyrights and signed contract, you shall promise refund if
it not works. You will never come to a situation it will be paid.
If it lose in fun mode, you state it can happen, it is no harm.
The refund is for real mode. If any claim it in real mode, they
must proof using screenshots, and as they did not follow the rules
you never have to admit it has lost. We always play 0.01, every
HG shall use 0.01, to bear a progression of 1 to 10000 and
if you do not fullfill it and eventually win, you can not get a refund.
The method is always winning!! Period!!.
#385
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 09:58:02 AMQuote from: JohnLegend on January 19, 2013, 08:28:53 AM
Ralph you have created a way to beat online Rngs it seems. Totally unpractical to play in a real casino. But you have got the RNG world in a bag it would appear. Well done for that.
I strive for methods that will travel. I can step into any casino or go online and the outcome will be the same. Each to their own.
All my methods will be impractical on BM.
#386
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 07:55:21 AM
3400 spins and plus 8482. The method has downdraws as any "HG" this time about 4000 units.
#387
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 06:06:55 AM
I think it is not smart business to ban anybody who has money to lose. A restriction on win do not mean it is restriction on lose
Now I have done 2500 spins, so it is still a lot to go.
5464 units plus.
The way I play is to pick a number ( in this case it has been number 1 all the 2500 spins) play one until first hit, if on plus set the autospin at 37 and run 37 spins using one, if on minus set the autospin at 37 and run two units.
On a hit and minus reset the autospin and continue using the same bet setting the autospin to 37. If 37 spins and no hit bet 3 and run for 37 spins, reset to 37 on a hit. Only increase if 37 spins without a hit using fib progression.
On plus start all over.
Now I have done 2500 spins, so it is still a lot to go.
5464 units plus.
The way I play is to pick a number ( in this case it has been number 1 all the 2500 spins) play one until first hit, if on plus set the autospin at 37 and run 37 spins using one, if on minus set the autospin at 37 and run two units.
On a hit and minus reset the autospin and continue using the same bet setting the autospin to 37. If 37 spins and no hit bet 3 and run for 37 spins, reset to 37 on a hit. Only increase if 37 spins without a hit using fib progression.
On plus start all over.
#388
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 19, 2013, 04:42:27 AM
I have to be pretty optimistic to live long enough to spend it if I take some care. Still I have my normal income.
This was not today it was in September last year. Many get such winning streak but do not have the stomach to use the opportunity, you have to bet a bit maniac.
They set restrictions if you win, I think all have it, like 5000 or 10000 the same day if you read the terms.
And they can change for individuals.
Here is the first 1727 spins of the session I will make long. I have played one number only and was up to 55 units in bet, down about 3000 units at most. Went plus 5061.
This was not today it was in September last year. Many get such winning streak but do not have the stomach to use the opportunity, you have to bet a bit maniac.
They set restrictions if you win, I think all have it, like 5000 or 10000 the same day if you read the terms.
And they can change for individuals.
Here is the first 1727 spins of the session I will make long. I have played one number only and was up to 55 units in bet, down about 3000 units at most. Went plus 5061.
#389
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts about the so called HG
January 18, 2013, 06:03:23 PMQuote from: TwisterUK on January 18, 2013, 12:27:57 PMNo, I got resiticions, keep your winnings to 2000 Euro/month
BV have stopped paying you ?
Are you now unable to play there ?
#390
General Discussion / Thoughts about the so called HG
January 18, 2013, 11:04:22 AM
From time to time every fora has post of never losing system, and sometimes they call them Hg. The most common "proof" is test running a very long sim. Ever more advanced analysis show it is not bullet proof. They have never challenge the Wizard of odds, which should gain more than play the HG in 100 years. Some try to earn from selling it.
Very common is they place very few bets, it can be 1 to 10 % of the spins, they claim it is needed for break down randomness, or wait for a sure trigger. What ever the sim is done in far less spins than claimed.
We know there are winners in the game of roulette, two different players can use the same method, one can win a lot, the other lose. To win in a very long run, you need a method, but without some luck it is not possible to win.
Every long series of spins has a large amount of spins which can be lost or won, it is not possible to find a method covering all, hence it is impossible to make a 100% sure method.
You can use a method which may help to some extent, progressions, statistic, but it can not for sure make you win, and the fact you have won is not a proof.
Most of the "winning" methods use a hefty bankroll, accept very deep drawdown, use progressions, and/or make a lot of spins without betting. Some use statistic. This can help, but still it is not so it forever "beat the wheel", if lucky you win if not it lose, and some methods lose very much when it happens.
I will start a testing, not with history spins, and a simulator, but a play at an on line casino, make a lot of spins, bet every spin and try to make it stand for very long. It will be done in fun mode at BV. The reason is I have to play less real for a while, as it is restrictions. They never ban winners (some claim it but it is not winnings then which is reason) but they can set restrictions on the max amount you are allowed to win (in future, you always get paid).
Very common is they place very few bets, it can be 1 to 10 % of the spins, they claim it is needed for break down randomness, or wait for a sure trigger. What ever the sim is done in far less spins than claimed.
We know there are winners in the game of roulette, two different players can use the same method, one can win a lot, the other lose. To win in a very long run, you need a method, but without some luck it is not possible to win.
Every long series of spins has a large amount of spins which can be lost or won, it is not possible to find a method covering all, hence it is impossible to make a 100% sure method.
You can use a method which may help to some extent, progressions, statistic, but it can not for sure make you win, and the fact you have won is not a proof.
Most of the "winning" methods use a hefty bankroll, accept very deep drawdown, use progressions, and/or make a lot of spins without betting. Some use statistic. This can help, but still it is not so it forever "beat the wheel", if lucky you win if not it lose, and some methods lose very much when it happens.
I will start a testing, not with history spins, and a simulator, but a play at an on line casino, make a lot of spins, bet every spin and try to make it stand for very long. It will be done in fun mode at BV. The reason is I have to play less real for a while, as it is restrictions. They never ban winners (some claim it but it is not winnings then which is reason) but they can set restrictions on the max amount you are allowed to win (in future, you always get paid).