Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Razor

#31
Dozen/Column / Re: something from another forum
April 17, 2013, 11:11:25 AM
In the beginning the pdf say :
"""
I reject the cynic's "Certainty " that you must lose in The Long Run particularly when

they carefully avoid telling us how long their Long Run is In Probability Theory there

are only two CERTAINTIES 0% and 100 %,Roulette is neither of these so it is untrue

to claim certainty where there is only uncertainty. Despite the cynics claims of

certainty the truth is - nobody knows for certain !Just in other areas of gambling.

Probability Theory deals with expectations not certainties.

We can speculate that we SHOULD win or lose but only time will tell. No one has

INFINITE time so we can only make educated ( ? ) guesses. in the time we have. My

SHORT RUN is this week, this month, this year and my LONG RUN Is the rest of my

betting life so talk of INFINITY in regard to roulette is utter nonsense.""""

Only by reading this...it is clear that the person that wrote it doesn t know anything about rulette.[/font][/size]
#32
"""There can be wiser approaches to gamble """

Wiser NO.
More conservative in order not to lose a lot YES. ( no progressions,stop loss.)
Let s hope one day we will find the wiser which means more profitable.
#33
Yes sure Sam.
But trends are just the tracks that randomness leaves behind.It should leave something behind as preveous results...either we call them trends or random results its the same thing.
Trying to ride them seems useless because NEW tracks will be added soon and they are UNPREDICTABLE.
They aren t human tracks they are the tracks of a random ball spining in a wheel with always 37 pockets of freedom...they have no root,no destination as human tracks.

But I am waiting the tool of Mr Gizmo with great interest.
#34
I am always trying to have an open mind but this "follow the trend" approach seems to me like anything else.
Because follow the trend or go against the trend has the same rate.
And even if we are mixing these events we can still lose because randomness has no flow.
What I say is that there is no better selection whatever we chose because the pockets of the wheel are still there and nothing is blocking the unbet pockets to hit.

That s my opinion that is comming from pure logic...

I respect Gizmos theory and I hope he really wins with it but I don t think it s any better than anything else.

Ofcource I hope I am wrong for the sake of all the members in here
#35
Thanks
#36
The new skin of the site is perfect
#37
Gizmotron can you please guide me to which topic/posts to look in order to read all your info about your HG?
Thank you.
#38
General Discussion / Re: EASY WAY TO BLOCK ADS
April 05, 2013, 09:24:31 AM
I think that the members can t see any ads.
AmI right?
#39
I don t believe in randomness flows(that can be traped) so I guess no 1 is the best way in my opinion.
#41
I agree with Ralph.


""" still there is gamblers who keep regular profits ..."""

I don t agree
#42
In order to say that something is working, it mustn t have the part "sometimes it doesn t work"
If it s working it can t lose...

If it can lose, then it s not working.
#43
"""And normal to lose at rapid rate when it goes against, we never win enough on our streaks."""

Exactly.
This bet selection is no better than any other.
Wheel doesn t know the order of the pockets.
So if the bet is on  pockets that are next to each other, or with 1 gap or with 2-3-4-5etc gaps or mixed, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

It s all about how many pockets you cover and what the(unfair) payment on a win is...and this doesn t change.
#44
It s normal to have a lot of wins when you bet 20 numbers.
:)

#45
General Discussion / Re: Math guys please
March 18, 2013, 09:41:32 PM
Quote from: Ralph on March 18, 2013, 07:21:59 AM
I am in the work to try to find a progression   which will survive a case like  65/135 in 200 spins, regardless how they fall. It can not always catch up during this spins, but are we expecting them to stay at that ratio?
.

It has been tried before Ralph