I did some quick test using Stef tracker and saw 25 L after series of 6 L as a trigger. So you went 31/0 in 1/3 chances bets.
In live play i saw 26 so far (1 dozen slept for 26 spins)

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 26, 2013, 10:16:36 AM
The first update will be in April Matt. The second update and first milestone in July. The third update in September. And 4th update and second milestone in December.

I run this like a business. Its not about getting rich fast. Its about steady overall bankroll growrh that proves what im doing can't be down to just luck. it's a test of your patience to wait for these updates Matt.

But after the second one in July you will know I mean business. And more than a few people will begin to realize. I know what im doing. Especially the owner of anothet forum. The lies he spread about me im just biding my time.

Im just curious John. You can prove all doubters that you are right by just posting transaction history from an online casino you play at. Ladbrokes if memory serves me right ?  Now you are on PP.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 25, 2013, 10:58:58 AM
That's what the challenge is all about Ralph, Matt. Started with 200 units on PP. And you will see what im able to do with that before they stop me. Superman is my verifier. And recieves 50% of everything for his part in this. April will be the first update. July the first milestone.

From there im certain ill have your attention.

So what's your current balance on PP?

John

Any chance of screen capture of betting history of any online casino you play at? 

Quote from: Atlantis on January 22, 2013, 10:55:11 AM

Hi Robeenhuut,
FIVE was superceded by 7on1 and was born out of it and is a lot easier to understand and track (and code). JL thought it superior as well, so that explains why FIVE was put on the back burner due to the testing and playing being switched to the 7on1 method.
A.

Atlantis

What method would you play if they both had 1000+ winning streak? The one that risks 80 units or 240 units to win 1?  They are both difficult to track and John has a patience.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 19, 2013, 11:04:40 PM
You are right and wrong at the same time Sam, PATTERN BREAKER is 4.5 years old. And ill be playing it till I draw my last breath.

7 on 1 is new. And although Bayes tests are discouraging. Remember they are sims and not H.A.R. Im still doing very well with it.

I've always used at least two methods. Atlantis CODE 4 H. Is too good to be ignored. It really is. So im using it. CODE V5 is the one yet to break on here. If it holds up it will.

It will put in an appearance. FIVES on the backburner. As 7 On 1 took presedence over it. I even have methods for the streets that I use from time to time.

Variety is the spice of life. So long as they're winning. They are there for use.

What happened to FIVE?  You had 1000+ winning run with that. And it was with 1,3,9,27 progression.

Quote from: Ophis on January 18, 2013, 12:18:08 AM
don't have that kind of statistics because didn't want to implement even more calculations in this bot.
But lately i was wondering my self what is the z-score here, i will let you know if i will have that done.

About bets. don't think that there will be millions of them... after all those systems suppose to be "supplements" in the grand project, but they performed so well (read: passed damn million spins) that i though i should show that.

Either way the idea here is to do something like MST but with "smart" systems (even unplayable) that actually can pass tons of spins.

Problem with MST is that adding -2.7% + -2.7% won't give you + no matter how you connect them.

that's why im trying to create systems that win... small (those do 0.03unit/spin)... but win.
if you add multiple system that will produce 0.0x/spin u can actually have something neat.


BTW:
Anyone got any systems that passes millions of spins? (even unplayable)?

Ophis

Looking at your Playtech sample of 20k spins there are sometimes more than 1000 spins without a bet. I think that you can give us a ballpark figure. And there are lots of systems that can pass 1M spins especially when you place only few thousand bets. For continuous play play Reversed Labby on RX. You will pass 1M few times. 

Quote from: albalaha on January 15, 2013, 11:31:06 AM
Einstein once commented upon the sole way to win roulette: "Steal  chips when croupier isn't looking".
Obviously, he was joking and was justified too since there is no simple mathematics that can beat the odds of the game, house edge, variances and table limits.
                  In a very complex mathematical setup and multiple bets running together through a bot, it has been recently made possible to beat millions of data, without ever going deeper than 14k. Mostly, a drop of 3 to 5 k can be witnessed but when u try millions of spins with infinite permutations and combinations possible of multiple bets that we run together, it is not very horrible.
                        The credit to develop such a complex working bot goes to none other but my friend Ophis. We have tested more than 10 millions spins data, including the one million provided by Bayes to confirm this. Winnings are not nominal but quite visible. We are still working to better it, even more and make it a money minting machine.
           It is a dream come true. See the graphs to feel its strength.


[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=2]

No mathematics can beat roulette. It appears looking at your 20k Playtech sample that you bet on average every 400-500 spins and in 1M spins it would mean max around 3000 bets with heavy progression......

You can pass with Reversed Labby 1M mark. If you play with 0.01u and 200u BR you can handle large draw downs. Hardly any new stuff. 

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 10, 2013, 03:28:02 PM
I've been testing consecutively to see if I would catch a loss live. But as you know I will always play H.A.R. I just want to see how long it could go on a live wheel before losing.

I started with DOZEN 1 and have 58 consecutive wins with that so far. I haven't really put alot of time into this. Because everyone knows this method will lose consecutively on an RNG or BOT. But I've never seen more than a 6 live.

That's the curiousity.

So what's the purpose of testing it consecutively? To say that after you go as you predict 2000/1 playing HAR and 2000/10 in continuous testing that HAR makes it a grail ? Just use Stef tracker and you will see how a strike rate fluctuates. I think that hitting F9 key to get 500 spins and a few games constitutes HAR.

This is useful for testing 7 0N 1. It shows max number of 4 gaps in each dozen. It generates 500 RNG spins. You just hit F9 key.
In 500 spins you get on average 10 games so you can calculate approximate strike rate or do it manually. Tracker was done by Stef.

Quote from: mattymattz on January 09, 2013, 12:53:08 PM
Although Arbitrage betting is a lot of work, done correctly it's Guaranteed Profits, so I'm surprised (well not really) that it garners such little attention.

Large BR is required. Without 5k Euro it does not make any sense.  Then there is a problem with being limited which will happen sooner or later at some bookies. Its guaranteed if you manage to place all bets almost at the same time without odds being changed. But some people make some money.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 09, 2013, 06:10:44 AM
You think so Matt. LOSING IT WHERE. Im now 910/0 LIVE with that bet. Not even challenged once yet.

My confidence in that bet was born on a live wheel. And it thrives on a live wheel. If a straight went to sleep for even 150 spins. How much would you have to bet to win 1 unit?

Your good run of 910/0 with 1,3,9,27,81 is as probable as 28/0 in PB if you believe my math. Declaring it HAR H.G is a bit premature don't you think? And i would not bet on a single number with hard progression.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 08, 2013, 07:11:52 PM
That is unusual. But not rare Gordonline. I have witnessed 30 or more unique numbers consecutive on several occasions in my 20 years with this game. The most I've ever seen is 33.

They say you will die before random would ever show you 37 for 37. So even 30 is pretty amazing. That would be a nightmare for inside repeater bettors.

Straights can destroy a man. I've seen it on many occasions. The worst mistake is having a favourite number. And believing it will show inside 100 spins. And then one day it goes to sleep. And wakes up 300 plus spins later.
That one has destroyed more than a few gamblers.

There is no such a thing as a worst mistake. Some prefer only inside, some only outside bets. If you bet with 1,3,9,27,81 progression to win 1 some consider a very bad bet. And losing it happens much often than seeing a number sleep for 300 spins.

Quote from: topcat888 on January 08, 2013, 07:18:32 AM
Really..? 

Usually players see rare events on RNG wheels like BV. They produce more spins and running into 4 numbers in a row can happen fairly quickly - its roughly as probable as seeing 16 EC's in a row.