Did you know that one number that hit once within 25 trails has the same random walk as EC.
So if a window of 25 trails goes by and you number does not hit - then you got black once.
If you get a new window with 25 trails with no hit then you get Another black.
Now if you get your number hit once within 25 trails you have red.

Ask Bayes ... he can explain the probability and math behind it.

Cheers

Quote from: NathanDetroit on October 14, 2016, 02:57:35 PM


Up and Plull Chapter 23 page  169>

Betting series Chapter 24 psge 172 >


You miust observe ALL of the given MM rules Win goal, Loss limit, 3 losses in a row, and never replay  any net wins.

I read and fully understand and i also find the Chapter "After a loss" very good read where you lower you bet and not increase.
Understanding four attempts and you are out ...

Cheers     

Quote from: NathanDetroit on October 12, 2016, 07:17:57 PM
Sputnik


Reread  John  Patrick`s  betting Black and Low in  competition with each other by applying the 2-1-2 regression Up and Pull system.

That`s the way I am betting  those 2 EC.  ( Both wheels 0 or 0/00)



For Dozens on the Single 0 wheel  It`s the First and Third dozen.

Hello ND ...
What page or pages or chapter in JP book?

Thanks

Hello ...

John Patrick has a HEDGE BET - if i remember correct one unit on Low and one unit on Black.
Then you cover 27 Numbers and lose if the 9 Red High Numbers Hit.

I have not solve the selection criteria using this kind of bet or staking plan.
But i am higly intressted in this kind of betting methodology.

Maybe other combination could work

Cheers

 I wounder if you could take advantage of some kind of signature this way - thanks for mention this.

I don't feel that the periodic sequense on a rolling basis is an issue.
This does not mean you have to bet on going and force your self facing the losing sequense.

This is the LW-Registry for the 100 trails i posted above - you did not need to show exaclty how and where you bet just show the strike ratio - but it does not matter now as you admit playing 24 numbers.

W W L W

Perfect for Regression Up & Pull
This is how the hole LW-Registry look like ...

W L W L L W L L L

W W L W W W L W L L W L L L

L W W L W

Cheers

I understand that one dozen sleep and two remain - but i can not see it so common that you get 5, 10, 15, 20 to sleep on regular basis which make it hard to take advantage.
Also the selection criteria picking the right 12 numbers remain with a 50/50 situation.

My Point from the beginning was that this is a bad selection criteria - my opinion.

Cheers

I don't understand when and why you bet - i add 100 random bits from random org - maybe you can show with them how to bet one dozen with a 50/50 situation.

Many thanks ...

1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
3
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
1

My understanding or what i assume is that the pinwheel method is 12 number bet.
I don't Think that is a good advice to wait for a sleeping dozen and then play a 50/50 situtation - is not working - but feel free to show an example.

Cheers

I come to one conclusion, after finding a solid selection method based upon certain principals i don't anymore share selections and keep them for my self.
Don't know how you implement Kimo Li's work - i took Contact with Kimo Li and he was at the beginning helpful and polite - but after my third email i got no more response.

This made me thinking about many things.
First i thinking about buying his book and assume i will get no slection criteria from it - but i will learn his way to divide the Wheel into different sections based upon his methodology.
Is it Worth 25 Euro - maybe.

Then i took a look at his site which is very nice and where he is Selling spreadsheets for his different methods - price around 10 Euro is ok.
So with his book and teaching and with his spreadsheet some one could search for patterns and signatures to follow or play.

This made me Think about how rare there is to buy a roulette book which include selection criterias.
Most books is only about Money management streategys and progression, same old story with all roulette books with some exceptions.

Could also see Kimo Li Selling some work for around 200/300 Euro each.
Maybe they list all clustering combinations, but i don't belive they come with when and why to bet which is the core about any gambling method.

I have not yet decide if i am going to buy Kimo Li book - because i got a bad vibe when he stop replying to my last email - maybe this is something about Three first lessons are for free and then stop.
Could also see he is Selling lessons - but then i get confused - if he does not talk and teach about selection criteria - then why would i want to get or buy lessons from Kimo Li.

Cheers

Hello ,,, if i remember it correct so does it exist a signature where you should hit 12 numbers with in three attempts using pinwheel methdology.
But Kimo Li does not tell where and why to bet, so you need to find some kind of signature.

A good start is to know that 12 numbers should hit once within four attempts, so if you can clustering that into numbers using pinwheel it would be great.
The difficult side is that you don't know which 12 numbers will hit within four attempts.

If you solve that you can get sequential attacks into catching a signature within Three attempts.
I solve this without using pinwheel methodology.

It look like this:

L W W W L W W W L L L

L W L L W W W L W L L W W W L W L L L

L W L L L

L W W L W W L L W L W W L W L L L

Thanks ...

Cheers

Roulette 30 forum is down - can not connect - do you have same issue?

Cheers

Quote
and even if you know there will be atleast 4  wins in the next 24 spins, you can't win then by knowing that.

Yes you can but i don't Selling any solution and will not talk more about the subject.
You can continue this topic and i will not be part of it.

Cheers

Missunderstanding again, you attack when regression is present not before.
Any one show belive they can bet against 19 contra 2 and recoup with no real expectaion measuring a the statistical Ecart & Variance is silly.