Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 12, 2014, 05:29:09 AM


This Progression strategy I think will only win when one has a bet-selection that pick out losses and avoid it.

This is good for LONG term bet.
What U think?
Any Suggestion???

Well unfortunately no one bet selection is better than another. 

I had this tested a decade ago by John Boyd, and tested it myself and variants of it.  Eventually bets keep escalating and never stop.

In testing RNG spins, you can get much worse than only 69 wins in 200 spins for EC's.  I recall seeing less than 60 wins, but that is very rare. 

Randomness has no limits. 

He does, but he won't....

That won't work.  If you use his method, and apply it to every possible 50 spin sequence, with the 5 wins spaced out, you will see you will hit table limits very often.

I just tested over 15 million single zero spins and analyzed H/L.

The worst case was only 24 wins in 100 spins.  If you can find a way to stay within table limits, and profit any time you get at least 24 wins in 100 spins, you would have the grail.  But good luck, because it can not be done!

I just tested just under 100 000 sessions using random numbers (without zero) and arrived at the following table:

1	0
2	46
3	1965
4	17085
5	41817
6	32005
7	6847
8	228
total	99993

As you can see in 99 9993 sessions, there was 8 unique patterns in 228 sessions. 

Rouletteresearch dot com has a file of 1 million real single zero spins in their downloads section.

So is there a strategy here that will be positive after >100 000 placed bets?