Xander


well....OPERA found a flaw in their technical setup....and neutrinos don't go faster than the universal speed limit (speed of light... as it is coined) so I won't hold my breath on casualty being reversed.


OPERA released the "bombshell" without full scrutiny.


You would get over excited I guess


As for Derren Brown, he isn't a fake. his an entertainer...an illusionist



(De Nero didn't turn round to camera during Raging Bull and say "Im only acting, you know")


Its like saying De Nero is a fake because he isn't really Jake LaMotta

All of which implies that a real wheel produces some kind of unique random. Considering they (casinos) spend so much time ensuring there is no bias...there won't be any discernable difference to notice.
Having said that...I can see people trusting the openly visible wheel to the RNG black box. That has to be the reason or you are believing the wheels random isn't random....for one reason or an other. Its either random or it isn't.

Quote from: Xander on February 10, 2014, 05:18:03 PM
You're getting closer to biased wheel play.  Throw in a little chi square testing in front or your hot number tracking and it will get more interesting.

Roulette Xtreme warns:


WARNING: Chi Square test is statistically insignificant and unreliable to determine bias if only small amounts of data (let's say only three cycles) are at hand, because despite to common belief deviations from expected  outcomes on a smaller amount of trials are mostly due to coincidence, not bias.


Just bigger than that....say 5 cycles is still not out of the woods.


How many cycles before you can trust a chi square test?

Take the London Marathon....


Journalist..... "I've covered the Marathon....I have 2000 words. Got a lovely story of a man who ran bare foot for charity""


Editor .... " did anyone have a heart attack?"


Journalist..." no"


Editor...." broken leg?"


Journalist "Nope"


Editor...." blisters on their feet.....very sore ones?"

I have an open mind on sochi as I've never been.
The first thing the media journalist looks for is to impress the editor and make his angle stand out.
Nice water and tropical fruit will not impress the editor.
He wants deaths at best and some level of suffering at worse.

"Go and find out if anyone's been poisoned by that water or fruit or I'm not interested"


Scare mongering doom merchants.

Quote from: Xander on February 08, 2014, 12:52:26 AM
The news here in the US, Canada, and the European news is showing that Sochi is not ready for the games, and that the place is like a ghetto.

don't be so brainwashed by the media.

Quote from: Xander on February 08, 2014, 12:09:32 AM
Iggiv,

Are you from there?

If you are, then I take back some of what I've said about there.    ( I thought you were Canadian?)

It bad practice to form an opinion based on others writings and experience. I don't really know you, but that doesn't seem to be your way. You seem to be similar to myself in the fact that you speak with authority on what you have proven for yourself (seen with your own eyes, so to speak), not blind faith.


rule no. 1. don't form an opinion based on anything the media has written. They have to sell papers.


Just thinking out loud really. Hope It didn't come across too badly.

Quote from: Xander on February 07, 2014, 10:36:26 PM
Basically, free will and thought is illegal there.

And you have the free will and thought to wish you could gamble online, which is comforting

Quote from: Xander on February 07, 2014, 09:33:32 PM


You've got to love communism!  LOL!!!    

I heard them Ruskey Communists banned their people from gambling online......unbelievable

Naked...

Should send them both down the bobsleigh run, strapped together, on a single bob luge with their feet bent up and tied  .


I'd pay good money to see that.

@Sputnik
Ta...nice to get a real test in.
@bing
The wife plays 0 32 26 now and again.
She left with more. Great night out.

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on January 30, 2014, 05:31:27 AM
Hi Turner,

Any progress with this one, or with any of your other RCR ideas?

I have a beauty of an RCR based system that would give our resident coders a friggin' heart attack!... hang on a bit, all of my systems give our resident coders a friggin' heart attack... 

Yes my friend


I've studied no other idea as of yet.


Tonight, I tried it at G casino with the wife and a small bankroll. £20 lol (50p bets)


So....here i would play 2,16,14


last no 31 2 16 14 31


As this was a test run tonight I played 50p. i also didn't play wide selections, only short ones like in the example.


I remember some numbers (they removed all pens and wheel cards for the first time tonight?!?)


23 (furthest)
19
26
23  (19 26)
33
1
7
19   Now here I win, and play 26,23,33,1,7
1   win and play 19 7
10
10   kills it.
35
10 play 35
35  (yes it did) play 10
22
16
10 (yes it did)


Overall I won £45


6 wins in 1 1/2 hours


Some repeats like 12 12 killed a bet for several spins.


and Yes.....I have another RCR idea.


just tested this so much (with very good results) I haven't got onto RCR2


Thanks for your interest Bing old boy

I think the doubt with RNG lies in the black box study...where we don't know if the casino has a side input to the black box and thus control of the output.
I don't doubt Random.org in the slightest.

Bayes....the sooner we have a recognised test bed where a system can be played under acceptable conditions....the better.
Then you could say " I ran this on the forum test bed...see saved file 123. pdf"
that's easier said than done, obviously.