Quote from: Xander on January 18, 2014, 01:39:56 AM
If people don't already know how to manage there money while gambling, then they shouldn't be playing.

Everything that gamblers need to know about money management can be written on just one page.  Too much time and money are wasted on the subject.
Gambler's should spend more time focusing on how to get the edge, and less time worrying and reading about money management and gambling discipline.  Money management and gambling discipline never has, and  never will affect the house edge.

Unfortunately It's all that some gambling authors have to sell because they suck at math.

Xander....you wernt born like this. Slim needs to start somewhere like we all did. You can't understand c) before you know a) and b)

It should be made like Wincraps...which is ancient. Pre programmed phrases to program it. Dead simple.
I never got the hang of programming rx.

Pockets.....just deleted my off topic comment. Back on track now
Please continue.

Pockets...I posted something called indiscrete tracking where I showed an idea that emphasised that sweet spot of 80 to 110 (ish) spins....so this is familiar.

Slim....sputniks last post is from Brett Morton, I spoke about.

Thanks Skakus.


I've learned a lot from you. The murky world between reality and Voodoo. it exists


Im hoping to submit other RCR ideas.I have about 4 that need work. it's a time consuming business.


Im not selling anything or promising anything.

Im not one for names....but I pushed the boat out.


RCR


Random Chosen Random (let the random output choose for you)



I've stripped down my testing. No wheels...No sectors...No carpets...No dozens...No streets


Just numbers. Numbers only.


What do they tell us?


I look for messages in the numbers all the time


RCR Idea 1


"Play numbers between a repeat"

22
13
12
14
22                                          we play 13 12 14
29
34
1
14(win)                                   we play 22 29 24 1  
1(win)                                     we play 14
17
22
23
24
26
11
22 (drop 14)                          we play 23 24 26 11
3
4
17
15
0
14
27
29
23 (win)                                 we play 24 26 11 22 3 4 17 15 0 14 27 29
0   (win)                                 we play 14 27 29 23
22                                          we have a conflict.....numbers between 22,22 or between 0,0 so we wait
1                                             we are betting nothing
0                                             we bet 22 1

I found Brett Mortons book a good read for that.

Quote from: Kattila on January 11, 2014, 11:45:51 PM
.i will tell you this in spanish way ....................
* Se hayan ido a tomar por culo *      ....No Marty ...no big unit progressions...

I will tell you this in English way


*you dropped a bollock*

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on January 11, 2014, 11:07:13 AM

pick up the chip, put it in my mouth, roll it under and over my tongue, spit it out and wipe it off with a tissue,

You've turned very Australian Skakus......although wiping it off with a tissue is still quite proper and quintessentially English.

@Tom....you are meeting Kevin "red eagle" Brown then.?


@Two cat Sam !!......his predecessor was called Bruce "Two Dogs" Bozsum lol


You 2 should have a fight.

Thanks Weddings....


RNG is a contentious issue. Could be a deal breaker for many. Who knows?


Good luck.

Weddings.....


Have to agree with Samster.....Casino will notice you have won a lot....and now you seem to be winning a whole lot more (especially online)I do have one question that I can't see answered (sorry if I missed your answer)Is this being played on RNG?personally, I think Bayes idea of playing a challenge would be great marketing for you....like a case study.


Just my view. Not intended to muddy any waters.

I'm glad you are doing well Weddings.....but this kind of offer is wrong. You know, I know and everyone who isn't gullible knows that your proposal isn't achievable....not in roulette anyhow.

You can't possibly put this forward without the caveat "you may get no return on your money, or lose your stake"

You have to specify that, and therefore take the edge of what appears to be too good to be true.

I most certainly will not be staking in this idea but I wish lots of luck to all who do.

People need to realize that the reason they would invest in this is because they can't get returns like that them self. They then need to realize that  they are experts in this game, and 50% return guaranteed is not achievable. The risk is identical to all the efforts you put in yourself....from which you have learned that 50% return is not achievable...guaranteed.

5% isn't achievable guaranteed

My advice is free and no one needs to subscribe to that advice.

Take it or leave it.

There is only one truth in roulette....casinos don't pay true odds.
The rest is subjective.