i confuse easily.....


isn't the question how long will an ec not hit twice


Does that mean


R B B B R B R B R B B R B B R B B B B B B B B R B R   

Quote from: Albalaha on December 25, 2013, 10:44:58 AM
I hate fallacies and fallacy mongers as well. I can test what I presume or "sense" having some value and through simulating random sessions I reach any conclusion. If I believe something to be workable I will test not less than 1000 sessions of 1000 spins each. Had I been on these fallacies I wouldn't have beaten 10 million spins.

I can't disagree with this statement The weight on my shoulders is that I believe nothing on face value....I have to go see it for my self. Not always possible...like the height of Mount Everest. Sometimes you just have to go with what's written...or set off to Nepal with a tape measure. Not always practical

Quote from: Bayes on December 24, 2013, 09:00:51 AM

Turner, I'm not offended, but don't you think that your comment reflects a rather cynical worldview?


i.e., we're all merely posturing egos strutting around on a stage and flexing our muscles. What about debate and discussion for the purpose of finding the truth? or do you think that all truth is relative, or that there is no such thing?

Yes I'm cynical....terribly so....and perhaps it was churlish of me to seemingly try to upset the post...


Having said that....I always admire how you back up your views with some quite awesome explanations...I'm just frustrated that the "noes to the left" don't explain their view equally as well....or at all.


Ill leave you guys to debate.


I'm (self admission) out of my league on this subject

Just my sense of humour...don't all get offended....but this whole post reminded of a Mr Universe body building competition

Quote from: Wally Gator on December 21, 2013, 09:15:21 PM
Hope this holiday season finds all happy and healthy.  Good luck in 2104.

Wally...unless medicine changes radically...I won't be here mate lol


All the best to all here !!!!

Quote from: Number Six on December 21, 2013, 04:50:22 PM

I'd be interested to know why you think virtual play holds any credence.

So would I, even though I agree with Bayes point of view, I would equally like to see why you don't.


I don't mean, lets agree to disagree....or, no it doesn't, I mean explain please.


I would find both explainations interesting


( it may change my view)

ll tentatively go for Garnabby

Number 6.....i really like your posts.


You say everything I know, that Im too scared to admit 

Then explored law of third and after digging through post after post after post across multiple roulette forums, figured out that anything that is around here as a bet selection is equally good as other. I have dug so deep that even though I have joined the forum very late, I can now remember dialogues that goes back to 7-8 years.

that's the alibi out the way then.....lol

Seriously.....its great to see a good parachute idea demoed on BV casino....again

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on December 19, 2013, 09:21:37 AM


...Yeah, like that's hard... 

No pizza for you BingBell.......and I was going to make you one with everything.

Quote from: Pockets on December 19, 2013, 07:50:33 AM
I thought your profile picture is the one of Buddha. Did not know it is your own picture

Im better looking than Buddha

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on December 18, 2013, 08:28:14 PM

And it's interesting that you're the one that looks like a bit of a Nigel....hahahaha!

Hmmm....not much better...Im a Trevor lol


Trevor's are always cast as kno.bheads on TV....

I think you will like this Pic.....


It was fairly even at this stage

Quote from: esoito on December 17, 2013, 07:12:24 AM
You and I have a similar idea -- to  have several systems that we would flat bet only.

A sort of 'mixed economy' so if one system was down then maybe the others would help maintain any profits.

Diversification is good enough for financial planners and farmers so it should be good enough for us too! 

Agreed...because if you have understood the ideas behind your system....you will understand that the marque isn't correct for that particular idea....but perfect for another
Lol.....I've even been known to play 13 after 31 when I really can't see anything there.
There is no system that just works for every recent history.

I read once, may of been Dean Sluyter, something I really liked.
It was something like this

You know the period of time that you were asleep last night? The bits you have zero memory about?
that's the real world.
Its when you start thinking....and being concious that the illusion begins.