Buffster. Glad you like it.
Personally.. The whole idea was to get away from balance. To see ecs where you didn't know there were any.
I have got very used to seeing 10 and quickly seeing what I want to see.
The only advantage I see from having 3 line ecs over the 3 usual ecs is the ability to play 50p a line so £ 1.50 per ec rather tha £5 table min.

What I am currently playing with is this...with good results.
Only look at the last hit. I will talk in R/B for demonstration
Last hit is left
So.....R B RRR B RRRR B RR B RR
Red is last hit
I will see all red series...so play for a single...so Black
B R B RRR B RRR B RR B RR
a win....now black is all singles so I play for a series. Play Black.

With 10 line ecs.....there is usually a trigger

R BB RR B RRR B R B R
playing R/ B....I would play for a single....but there is a single recently....but I can't wait all day for 4 or 5 series. Its rare.
With 10 lines as ECs.....some EC will be 4 or 5 singles or series now....or in the next spin or 2.
Like I said....Im only playing around with this.
Its currently in the "wow this works" phase" closely followed by the "hmmmmm" phase

Malcop....i don't get it....BUT....but before you roll your eyes....its an example. Just what I wanted.
I will study this tonight....and like i said....its an example...which is like gold to me

Thanks

Quote from: TwoCatSam on October 30, 2013, 12:54:07 AM
Turner, Sir, your queen is in danger.

Sir Elton? 

Sam....we talk of chess Queen not pop Queen[smiley]aes/blush.png[/smiley]
Note to Vic..
This was my big chance to use a smiley with ZOOM glasses on. Its not there


[smiley]aim/cool10.gif[/smiley][smiley]aim/dilbertcool.gif[/smiley][smiley]aim/gaypridecool.gif[/smiley][smiley]aim/redcool.gif[/smiley][smiley]aim/toyballcool.gif[/smiley][smiley]cactus/h001.gif[/smiley][smiley]cps/cool.gif[/smiley][smiley]bunny/shades.gif[/smiley][smiley]gtalk/coolrec.png[/smiley][smiley]icq/cool.gif[/smiley][smiley]icq/cool(1).gif[/smiley][smiley]icq/cool.jpg[/smiley][smiley]icq/icq-cool.gif[/smiley][smiley]monkey/crazy-monkey-emoticon-008.gif[/smiley][smiley]monkey/crazy-monkey-emoticon-142.gif[/smiley][smiley]monkey/crazy-monkey-emoticon-131.gif[/smiley][smiley]msn/hot.png[/smiley][smiley]pacoo/4ED549D46F200395311AB2217F9.gif[/smiley][smiley]pidgin/pidgincool.gif[/smiley][smiley]popo/r-matrix.png[/smiley][smiley]semo/semo-icon_cool.ico-0.png[/smiley][smiley]shr/09.png[/smiley][smiley]skype/cool.gif[/smiley][smiley]toto/d200712191811398362.gif[/smiley][smiley]toto/d200712201619577897.gif[/smiley][smiley]yahoo/yahoocool.gif[/smiley]


Cool Test

Apologies....Turbos hot number test was more than 1 number

Quote from: Drazen on October 29, 2013, 09:52:21 PM

What is the problem? Why would this be better than anything else?

Drazen

I have to agree. random within random within random.


If you isolate a "way"....like this one...where some event happens after some amount of times, those isolated evens are again random.


Its an illusion that you have found something random does. Random doesn't do anything. Its random


Its like seeing a perfect Horse shape in a cloud. it's a cloud. it isn't a Horse


Now..... you saw a Horse. You arnt going mad. It was there


Now predict which cloud will be the next to make a Horse shape.


Different story.

I think Turbo did something called "another hot number test" I think its coded into RX somewhere.

just tried this 3 times. Totally simple on RX...just play 30 and see what pops up


1. 27 only qualified (hit twice after showing 2 times more) out of 6....never showed
2. no qualified number ever hit again (stayed at one)
3. same as 2

Thanks Superman


I pointed out where I am stuck below. A chess situation will explain my predicament


I would read a chess book, explaining a Grandmaster game...."and this moves here because of that"..."and Bishop takes Pawn because of this",...THEN....the author says, (with 20 moves to go), "and white won easily"

Did he? I can't see how he did. How did he win easily?


Im left thinking "I read all this and still didn't learn a whole thing"

Quote from: Superman on October 29, 2013, 06:03:36 PM
As far as I know an LW registry is a record of YOUR wins and losses, the way I use mine is all in me head, stopped writing it down a long time ago, the best way for me to explain it is, you play a certain way, eg, follow the last after 3 colours in a row, your results for the last 3 sessions look like this

WWLLWLWLLLWLWLLLWLLWLLLLWWWW
LLWWWWLWWLLLWWLWLWWLWLWWW
WLLLWWLWWWWWLWWLWWLLWLLLWW

So you now know the worst you had was 4 losses in a row and the best was 5 wins in a row , now a normal fool would jump in with a Marty here (Jump in here and do what?), don't, because it could go t1ts up as we all know, the way I play is mentally keeping track of the session knowing that if I have 3 losses I can now increase my bet to recover fairly safely until ahead again.(perfect!!!!....Im getting close now....What have you seen to know you can increase?)

Obviously that's a small snippet of sessions, but it's just an example, personally I would not try to use an LW registry on a mechanical system as they always fail eventually, just use it on a style of play, which is what I do, yes all bets (EC's for me) are 50/50 but if you play a set way always, you start to see patterns in your personal LW registry and can work with that to recover if behind.(work with that how?...I just see lots of LW...its not giving me any hints what to do)

HTH

Quote from: Sputnik on October 29, 2013, 05:33:05 PM

If i understand you right so is that the same thing asking how to play or drive the car ?

Yes Sputnik.....I know what a LW register is, and what you use it for. I also know you can see SD in LW and play for regression to the mean.


I just don't know how to use it.


I downloaded Bayes LW registry tracker....read his QA on what all the bits do...but Im still missing an actual example.


I like to understand things totally so I can make my own mind up about them. I never take anyones word for anything.

Sputnik...thanks...and back to my car analogy....I know its about doing things with clutch and accelerator....and you just told me that you can get in a car and drive to other places. I still can't actually drive the car.

EC for now would be nice....s'il vous plait

Hello
Can someone kindly point me to a post where LW registry is explained...or explain here.
Currently....im a bit like I know that you press a clutch and accelerator with gears to drive a car....but no one told me where or what a clutch...accelerator or gears actually are.
Many thanks

ND...no babes to speak of. Groups of desperate Asian and Chinese men losing thousands in minutes

Ego....IMO....that's observing SD obviously.


And I agree....BUT


Like series and single are equal over time, or Rvs B and they grow to high SD where you can play for regression,  they do something else much much more.


Its none of the above.....


What they do most is ebb and flow in small waves. You can bet this simply and all the time and win more than "not" playing these and waiting for high SD. High SD is rare. Small waves are not. They ...well...are always there apart from when one carries on to a high SD....which can take a while.


If you wait for say, 6 against 1, then wait for 6 against 2 to predict the SD has turned back, on average, a series of 6 is seen once in 74 spins RRRRRRB.....quicker is RRRBRRR with series of 3 expected in 7 spins...but it doesn't play nice like that, and the other 4 spins in 7 will probably be singles...so your RRRBRRR with an SD of 1.9.. is more likely to be  RRRBRBBRRRBRB with an SD of +1
In other words, The higher the series, the higher the SD of R vs B and the longer you wait to see it.


SD3.0 is RRRRRRRRR  and the probability tells us you will see this once in 654 spins


Or RRRRRRBRRRRRR with series of 6 which should appear once in 74 spins....so its highly improbable to have 2 x 6 in 13 spins. And that's the best you can do for SD3..... 2 x 6 R and 1 B




You can see visibly that SD turns back more before it got too high by the fact there are more RBR, than RRBR, than RRRBR, than RRRRBR etc.


Am I talking out of my Ar.se Baxksie?....perhaps I am.

Quote from: Mr J on October 27, 2013, 05:00:59 PM
You have to stick to a method (imo) where you know in FOUR seconds, what/how much to bet next.

I have 2 plays. Online and real. I have to agree with you totally Ken.


I dropped repeat methods online a while ago. EC only.


me and the wife went to the casino yesterday and I played repeats on the marque. 50p chips.


Mostly 1 or 2 chips.....max 4. I can't think straight with everyone throwing chips around to be tracking and MM


I play flat bet. i add chips here and there with casino money. Very simple and basic. Very relaxing


spent a very enjoyable 3 hours in there. didn't miss a spin. as you say...knew what to play in 4 sec.


heres proof I was there lol